Response to: Why young women should be screened for cervical cancer: The distinction between CIN2 and CIN3

International Journal of Cancer

Volumn 126, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2257-2258

  Sasieni, Peter ^a   Castañón, Alejandra ^a   Parkin, Max D ^a  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MOLECULAR MARKER;

AGE DISTRIBUTION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER GROWTH; CANCER INVASION; CANCER PREVENTION; CANCER RECURRENCE; CANCER REGRESSION; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COUNSELING; DYSKARYOSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; ICELAND; LETTER; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK REDUCTION; UNITED KINGDOM; UTERINE CERVIX BIOPSY; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA IN SITU; UTERINE CERVIX CYTOLOGY;

EID: 77950608598     PISSN: 00207136     EISSN: 10970215     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ijc.24785     Document Type: Letter

References (11)

1. Peto J, Gilham C, Fletcher O, Matthews FE. The cervical cancer epidemic that screening has prevented in the UK. Lancet 2004;364: 249-256
2. Parkin DM, Nguyen-Dinh X, Day NE. The impact of screening on the incidence of cervical cancer in England and Wales. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1985;92:150-157
3. Office for National Statistics, Cancer Statistics Registrations, 2003. Department of Health, Cervical Screening Programme, England 2002-2003, 2003.
4. The Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State for Health (Ann Keen), Cervical Screening. Press Release, 29 June 2009. Available from http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090624/wmstext/ 90624m0002.htm#09062492000115.
5. Morrison BJ, Coldman AJ, Boyes DA, GH A. Forty years of repeated screening: the significance of carcinoma in situ. British Journal of Cancer 1996;74:814-819
6. Moscicki AB, Shiboski S, Hills NK, Powell KJ, Jay N, Hanson EN, Miller S, Canjura-Clayton KL, Farhat S, Broering JM, Darragh TM. Regression of low-grade squamous intra-epithelial lesions in young women. Lancet 2004;364:1678-1683
7. Schlecht NF, Platt RW, Duarte-Franco E, Costa MC, Sobrinho JP, Prado JC, Ferenczy A, Rohan TE, Villa LL, Franco EL. Human papillomavirus infection and time to progression and regression of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95:1336-1343 (Pubitemid 37160867)
8. Sigurdsson K, Sigvaldason H. Is it rational to start population-based cervical cancer screening at or soon after age 20? Analysis of time trends in preinvasive and invasive diseases. Eur J Cancer 2007;43: 769-774
9. Statistics Iceland [database on the Internet] 2009. Available from: http://www.statice.is/pages/916.
10. Department of Health, Cervical Screening Programme, England 2003-2004, 2004.
11. The Health and Social Care Information Centre, Cervical Screening Programme, England 2007-2008, October 2008.