Registration accuracy in computer-assisted pelvic surgery

Computer Aided Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 1-3, 2009, Pages 37-44

  Docquier, P L ^a   Paul, L ^a   Cartiaux, O ^a   Banse, X ^a  

^a CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Pelvic surgery; Registration; Surface based matching

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; BONE TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PELVIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BONE NEOPLASMS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; MODELS, ANATOMIC; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PELVIS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 77950607222     PISSN: 10929088     EISSN: 10970150     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/10929080903024361     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Rajasekaran S, Vidyadhara S, Ramesh P, Shetty AP. Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 2007;32:E56-E64.
2. Kotani Y, Abumi K, Ito M, Takahata M, Sudo H, Ohshima S, Minami A. Accuracy analysis of pedicle screw placement in posterior scoliosis surgery: Comparison between conventional fluoroscopic and computer-assisted technique. Spine 2007;32:1543-1550. (Pubitemid 46956151)
3. Langlotz F, Bächler R, Berlemann U, Nolte LP, Ganz R. Computer assistance for pelvic osteotomies. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998;354:92-102. (Pubitemid 28424050)
4. Wong K, Kumta SM, Chiu K, Cheung K, Leung K, Unwin P, Wong MCM. Computer assisted pelvic tumor resection and reconstruction with a custom-made prosthesis using an innovative adaptation and its validation. Comput Aided Surg 2007;12:225-232. (Pubitemid 47356726)
5. Krettek C, Geerling J, Bastian L, Citak M, Rücker F, Kendoff D, Hüfner T. Computer aided tumor resection in the pelvis. Injury 2004;35(Suppl 1):S-A79-S-A-83.
6. Pakvis D, van Hellemondt G, Anderson P, de Kleuver M. No benefits with computer assistance in triple pelvic osteotomy. Acta Orthop Scand 2004;75:265-268. (Pubitemid 38824201)
7. Van Hellemondt G, De Kleuver M, Kerckhaert A, Anderson P, Langlotz F, Nolte LP, Pavlov PW. Computer-assisted pelvic surgery: An in vitro study of two registration protocols. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;405:287-293. (Pubitemid 36008273)
8. Sugano N, Sasama T, Sato Y, Nakajima Y, Nishii T, Yonenobu K, Tamura S, Ochi T. Accuracy evaluation of surface-based registration methods in a computer navigation system for hip surgery performed through a posterolateral approach. Comput Aided Surg 2001;6:195-203. (Pubitemid 34118299)
9. Mayr E, de la Barrera JM, Eller G, Bach C, Nogler M. The effect of fixation and location on the stability of the markers in navigated total hip arthroplasty: A cadaver study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2006;88:168-172. (Pubitemid 43279925)
10. Zitova B, Flusser. J. Image registration methods: A survey. Image Vision Comput 2003;21:977-1000.
11. Herring JL, Dawant BM, Maurer CR, Muratore DM, Galloway RL, Fitzpatrick JM. Surface-based registration of CT images to physical space for image-guided surgery of the spine: A sensitivity study. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1998;17:743-752.