Scheduling level of detail with guaranteed quality and cost

Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on 3D Web Technology, Web3D '02

Volumn , Issue , 2002, Pages 43-51

  Pasman, W ^a   Jansen, F W ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Cost; On the fly level of detail generation; Quality; Scene graph; Scheduling; Trade off

Indexed keywords

GUARANTEED QUALITY; LEVEL OF DETAIL; LEVELS OF DETAIL; ON-THE-FLY; ON-THE-FLY GENERATION; PROTOTYPE IMPLEMENTATIONS; SCENE GRAPH;

SCHEDULING; SOFTWARE PROTOTYPING; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

COMMERCE;

EID: 77950575723     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/504502.504510     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (37)

1. Aliaga, D.G., Lastra, A.A. Smooth transitions in texturebased simplification. Computers & Graphics, 1998; 22 (1), 71-81. On Web: http://www.cs.unc.edu/~aliaga/Publications/cg98.pdf
2. Maciel, P.W.C., Shirley, P. Visual navigation of large environments using textured clusters. In Proceedings of the 1995 Symposium on Interactive 3D Graphics, 1995; 95-102.
3. Darsa, L., Costa, B., Varshney, A. Walkthroughs of complex environments using image-based simplification, Computers and Graphics 1998; (22) 1, 55-69.
4. Riegel, T. Coding of PANORAMA 3-D sequences. 1998. On Web: http://uranus.ee. auth.gr/~alex/panorama/deliverables/D031.ps.gz
5. Schaufler, G., Priglinger, M. Efficient Displacement Mapping by Image Warping. 10th EUROGRAPHICS Workshop on Rendering (Granada, Spain), 2000; 175-186. On Web: http://graphics.lcs.mit.edu/~gs/papers
6. McMillan, L. An image-based approach to threedimensional computer graphics. PhD Thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 1997. Also available as UNC Technical Report TR97-013.
7. Debevec, P.E., Taylor, C.J., Malik, J. Modelling and rendering architecture from photographs: A hybrid geometry- and image-based approach. Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH'96, 1996; 11-20.
8. Shade, J., Gortler, S., He, L., Szeliski, R. Layered depth images. Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'98), 1998; 231-242.
9. Mark, W.R. Post-Rendering 3D Image Warping: Visibility, Reconstruction, and Performance for Depth-Image Warping. Doctoral dissertation. UNC Computer Science Technical Report TR99-022, University of North Carolina, April 21, 1999. On Web: http://www.cs.unc.edu/~billmark/research.html.
10. Garland, M. Quadric-based polygonal surface simplification. Doctoral thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, 1999.
11. Pasman, W., Jansen, F.W. Comparing object simplification methods for thin client 3D rendering systems. Submitted to IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 2001.
12. Pasman, W., Schaaf, A. van der, Lagendijk, R.L., Jansen, F.W. Accurate overlaying for mobile augmented reality. Computers & Graphics, 1999, 23 (6), 875-881. On Web:www.cg.its.tudelft.nl/~wouter
13. Garland, M. QSlim 2.0 [Computer Software]. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, UIUC Computer Graphics Lab, 1999. On Web: http://graphics.cs. uiuc.edu/~garland/software/qslim.html
14. Montrym, J.S., Baum, D.R., Dignam, D.L., Migdal, C.J. InfiniteReality: A real-time graphics system. Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH'97, 1997; 293-301
15. Eckel, G. Cliptextures. Chapter 10 in IRIS Performer Programmer's Guide, SGI Technical Publications, Silicon Graphics Incorporated, Mountain View, CA, 1995. On Web: http://techpubs.sgi.com/library
16. Cignoni, P., Montani, C., Rocchini, C., Scopigno, R. A general method for preserving attribute values on simplified meshes. Proceedings of the conference on Visualization '98, 1998; 59-66.
17. Cohen, J., Olano, M., Manocha, D. Appearanceperserving simplification. Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer Graphics, 1998, 115-122.
18. Schaufler, G. Dynamically Generated Impostors. GI Workshop "Modeling - Virtual Worlds - Distributed Graphics", D.W.Fellner (Ed.), infix Verlag, November, 1995; 129-135.
19. Schaufler, G. Per-Object Image Warping with Layered Impostors. Proc. 9th Eurographics Workshop on Rendering '98 (Vienna, Austria, June 29-July 1), 1998; 145-156.
20. Lengyel, J., Snyder, J. Rendering with coherent layers. Proc. SIGGRAPH'97, 1997, 233-242.
21. Decoret, X., ,Schaufler, G., Sillion, F., Dorsey, J. Multilayered impostors for accelerated rendering. Computer Graphics Forum (Proceedings of Eurographics '99), 1999; 18 (3), 61-73.
22. Funkhouser, T.A., Séquin, C.H., Teller, S.J. Management of large amounts of data in interactive building walkthroughs. Proc. 1992 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics, 1992, 11-20.
23. Funkhouser, T.A., Séquin, C.H. Adaptive display algorithm for interactive frame rates during visualization of complex virtual environments. Computer Graphics (SIGGRAPH'93 proceedings) 27 (Augustus), 1993, 247-254
24. UbiCom. Ubiquitous Communications: Aiming at a new generation systems and applications for personal communication. DIOC program at Delft University of Technology. 2000; On Web: http://www. ubicom.tudelft.nl
25. Web3D Consortium. VRML97 International Standard ISO/IEC 14772-14781:1997.
26. Eckel, G. Active Surface Definition. Chapter 15 in IRIS Performer Programmer's Guide, SGI Technical Publications, Silicon Graphics Incorporated, Mountain View, CA, 1995. On Web: http://techpubs.sgi.com/library
27. Barber, C.B., Dobkin, D.P., Huhdanpaa, H. The Quickhull algorithm for convex hulls. ACM Trans. on Mathematical Software, 1996, 22 (4), 469-483. On Web:http://www.geom.umn.edu/software/qhull
28. Mason, A.E.W., Blake, E.H. Automatic Hierarchical Level of Detail Optimization in Computer Animation. Computer Graphics Forum, 1997, 16 (3), 191-200.
29. Dijk, H., Langedoen, K., Sips, H. ARC: A bottom-up approach to negotiated QoS. Proc. WMCSA'2000 (7-8 December, Monterey, CA), 2000, 128-137.
30. Hoppe, H. Progressive meshes. SIGGRAPH proceedings, 1996, 99-108.
31. Luebke, D., Erikson, C. View-dependent simplification of arbitrary polygonal environments. SIGGRAPH proceedings, 1997, 199-208.
32. Clark, J.H. Hierarchical geometric models for visible surface algorithms. Communications of the ACM, 1976,19 (10), 547 - 554. Also in JC Beatty & KS Booth (Eds, 1982), Tutorial: Computer Graphics (2nd. ed), IEEE computer society, Los Angeles, CA, 296-303.
33. Scopigno, R. (1998). Surface Simplification: Measuring Error on Simplified Surfaces. Available Internet:http://vcg.iei.pi.cnr.it/metro.html.
34. Piponi, D., Borshukov, D. Seamless Texture Mapping of Subdivision Surfaces by Model Pelting and Texture Blending. Proc. SIGGRAPH'2000, 471-478.
35. Watson, B.A., Friedman, A., McGaffey, A. Measuring and predicting visual fidelity. Proc. SIGGRAPH 2001, 213-220. Available Internet: http://www.cs.nwu. edu/~watsonb/school/publications.html.
36. Luebke, D., Hallen, B. Perceptually Driven Simplification for Interactive Rendering. In Rendering Techniques (S. Gortler & K. Myszkowski, Ed.), Springer-Verlag, London, 2001.
37. Reddy, M. Perceptually Optimized 3D Graphics. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 2001, 21 (5), 68-75.