Near-road air pollutant concentrations of CO and PM2.5: A comparison of MOBILE6.2/CALINE4 and generalized additive models

Atmospheric Environment

Volumn 44, Issue 14, 2010, Pages 1740-1748

  Zhang, Kai ^a   Batterman, Stuart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

CALINE4; CO; Dispersion modeling; Generalized additive model; MOBILE6.2; PM2.5; Traffic counts

Indexed keywords

AIR POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS; CALIFORNIA; CALINE4; CO CONCENTRATIONS; CO EMISSIONS; DETROIT; DISPERSION MODELING; DISPERSION MODELS; EMISSION FACTORS; GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MODEL; LINE SOURCES; LINEAR RELATIONSHIPS; MEASUREMENTS OF CARBON MONOXIDE; METEOROLOGICAL DATA; METEOROLOGICAL VARIABLES; MICHIGAN; MOTOR VEHICLE EMISSIONS; PARTICULATE MATTER; PIECEWISE LINEAR; POLLUTANT LEVELS; SIMULATION MODEL; TIME SERIES MODELS; TRAFFIC COUNTS; VEHICLE EMISSION; VEHICULAR TRAFFIC;

AIR QUALITY; CARBON MONOXIDE; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); PIECEWISE LINEAR TECHNIQUES; POLLUTION; ROADS AND STREETS;

DISPERSIONS;

CARBON MONOXIDE;

AIR QUALITY; ATMOSPHERIC POLLUTION; CARBON MONOXIDE; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ESTIMATION METHOD; PARTICULATE MATTER; SIMULATION; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TRAFFIC EMISSION;

AIR POLLUTANT; AIR POLLUTION; AIR QUALITY; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; EXHAUST GAS; METEOROLOGY; PARTICULATE MATTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIMULATION; SPRING; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUMMER; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; UNITED STATES; WINTER;

DETROIT; MICHIGAN; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77950559675     PISSN: 13522310     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2010.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. 2.5 emission rates. Atmospheric Environment 2003, 37:5157-5164.
2. Aldrin M., Haff I. Generalized additive modeling of air pollution, traffic volume and meteorology. Atmospheric Environment 2005, 39:2145-2155.
3. Benson P. CALINE4-A Dispersion Model for Prediction Air Pollutant Concentrations Near Roadways. FHWA-CA-TL-84-15 1989, California Department of Transportation, Sacramento, CA.
4. Benson P. A review of the development and application of the CALINE3 and 4 models. Atmospheric Environment 1992, 26B(3):379-390.
5. Carslaw D., Beevers S., Tate J. Modelling and assessing trends in traffic-related emissions using a generalised additive modelling approach. Atmospheric Environment 2007, 41:5289-5299.
6. CCPA Ambient Particulate Matter Characterization Guidelines 2001, CCPA, (accessed 16.03.09). http://www.ccpa.ca/files/Library/Documents/Environment/NERM_Resources/Ambient_Particulate_Matter_Guidelines_010329.pdf.
7. Chen H., Bai S., Eisinger D., Niemeier D., Claggett M. Modeling uncertainties and near-road PM2.5: a comparison of CALINE4, CAL3QHC and AERMOD (accessed 26.06.09). http://aqp.engr.ucdavis.edu/Documents/2008-Chen-Dispersion-Model-Report-PM-final.pdf.
8. 2.5 to climate in the Eastern US: a modeling case study. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 2007, 7:4295-4309.
9. deCastro R., Wang L., Mihalic J., Breysse P., Geyh A., Buckley T. The longitudinal dependence of black carbon concentration on traffic volume in an urban environment. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2008, 58(7):928-939.
10. Dominici F., McDermott A., Zeger S., Samet J. On the use of generalized additive models in time series of air pollution and health. American Journal of Epidemiology 2002, 156(3):193-203.
11. EPA Guideline on Air Quality Models 1999, EPA, (accessed 22.11.06). http://www.epa.gov/scram001/tt25.htm%23guidance.
12. EPA Diesel Retrofit Technology: An Analysis of the Cost-Effectiveness of Reducing Particulate Matter Emissions From Heavy-Duty Diesel Engines Through Retrofits 2006, EPA, (accessed 26.06.09). http://epa.gov/otaq/diesel/documents/420r07005.pdf.
13. EPA Analysis of Particulate Matter Emissions from Light-Duty Gasoline Vehicles in Kansas City 2008, EPA, (accessed 26.06.09). http://www.epa.gov/OMS/emission-factors-research/420r08010.pdf.
14. Faraway J.J. Extending the Linear Model with R: Generalized Linear, Mixed Effects and Nonparametric Regression Models 2006, Chapman & Hall/CRC, 221; 221; 231; 120; 29.
15. Hastie T., Tibshirani R. Generalized Additive Models 1990, Chapman & Hall, London, 299-300; 90; 136; 159-161.
16. 2.5 near an interstate highway in Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. Atmospheric Environment 2006, 40:S378-S395.
17. Joumard R., André M., Vidon R., Tassel P., Pruvost C. Influence of driving cycles on unit emissions from passenger cars. Atmospheric Environment 2000, 34:4621-4628.
18. Kingham S., Briggs D., Elliott P., Fischer P., Lebret E. Spatial variations in the concentrations of traffic-related pollutants in indoor and outdoor air in Huddersfield, England. Atmospheric Environment 2000, 34:905-916.
19. Levy J., Bennett D., Melly S., Spengler J. Influence of traffic counts on particulate matter and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon concentrations in Roxbury, Massachusetts. Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology 2003, 13:364-371.
20. MDEQ Michigan 2004 Annual Air Quality Report 2005, MDEQ, (accessed 22.06.07). http://www.deq.state.mi.us/documents/deq-aqd-air-reports-04AQReport.pdf.
21. MDOT Average Daily Traffic Map Archives 2006, MDOT, (accessed 22.02.09). http://mdotwas1.mdot.state.mi.us/public/maps_adtmaparchive.
22. 2.5 during summer inhalation exposure studies in Detroit, MI. Atmospheric Environment 2006, 40(21):3823-3834.
23. Pierce T., Isakov V., Haneke B., Paumier J. Emission and air quality modeling tools for near-roadway applications (accessed 26.06.09). http://www.epa.gov/airscience/pdf/Pierceetal_EPA2008.pdf.
24. Roorda-Knape M., Janssen N., De Hartog J., van Vliet P., Harssema H., Brunekreef B. Air pollution from traffic in city districts near major motorways. Atmospheric Environment 1998, 32:1921-1930.
25. Schlink U., Dorling S., Pelikan E., Nunnari G., Cawley G., Junninen H., Greig A., Foxall R., Eben K., Chatterton T., Vondracek J., Richter M., Dostal M., Bertucco L., Kolehmainen M., Doyle M. A rigorous intercomparison of ground-level ozone predictions. Atmospheric Environment 2003, 37:3237-3253.
26. Solomon P.A., Hopke P.K., Froines J., Scheffe R. Key scientific findings and policy-and health-relevant insights from the U.S. environmental protection agency's particulate matter supersites program and related studies: an integration and synthesis of results. Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association 2008, 58(Suppl. 13):3-92.
27. Southeast Michigan Council of Governments (SEMCOG) Ozone and Carbon Monoxide Conformity Analysis for the Proposed Amendment of the 2030 Regional Transportation Plan for Southeast Michigan Draft 2006, SEMCOG.
28. Transportation Research Board (TRB) The Congestion Mitigation and Air Quality Improvement Program, Assessing 10 Years of Experience. Special Report 264 2002, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, D.C, pp. 60-64.
29. Whiteside, L., 2006. The 2004 year vehicle classification data at the I-75 PTR 9799.
30. WHO Health Effects of Transport-related Air Pollution 2005, WHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, pp. 125-165.
31. Yura, E., Niemeier, D., Kear, T., 2006. PM2.5 Modeling capabilities of CALINE4. In: 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board.
32. Zhu Y., Hinds W., Kim S., Shen S., Sioutas C. Study of ultrafine particles near a major freeway with heavy duty diesel vehicles. Atmospheric Environment 2002, 36:4323-4335.