Determinants of public trust in complementary and alternative medicine

BMC Public Health

Volumn 10, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Van Der Schee, Evelien ^a   Groenewegen, Peter P ^b,c  

^a Parnassia Research Centre   (Netherlands)

^b NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MASS MEDIUM; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STANDARD; TRUST;

ACCESS TO INFORMATION; ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; COMPLEMENTARY THERAPIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MASS MEDIA; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT PREFERENCE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SOCIAL SUPPORT; TRUST;

EID: 77950550887     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-128     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. JW Pratt RJ Zeckhauser, Principals and Agents : The Structure of Business Boston: Harvard Business School Press 1985
2. The social control of impersonal trust. SP Shapiro, Am J Sociol 1987 93 623 658 10.1086/228791
3. Agency in health care: getting beyond first principles. G Mooney M Ryan, J Health Econ 1993 12 125 135 10.1016/0167-6296(93)90023-8 10127772
4. In my chosen doctor I trust. D Mechanic, BMJ 2004 329 1418 1419 10.1136/bmj.329.7480.1418 15604163
5. Researching trust relations in health care: conceptual and methodological challenges - introduction. M Calnan R Rowe, J Health Organ Manag 2006 20 349 358 10.1108/14777260610701759 17087399
6. Trust and the sociology of the professions. PP Groenewegen, Eur J Public Health 2006 16 3 4 10.1093/eurpub/ckl003 16446296
7. Trust in physicians and medical institutions: what is it, can it be measured, and does it matter? M Hall E Dugan B Zheng A Mishra, Milbank Q 2001 79 613 639 10.1111/1468-0009.00223 11789119
8. Public trust in Dutch health care. GF Straten RD Friele PP Groenewegen, Soc Sci Med 2002 55 227 234 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00163-0 12144137
9. GP Westert MJ van den Berg X Koolman H Verkleij (editors), Dutch Health Care Performance Report Bilthoven: RIVM 2008
10. Doktor geniet nog steeds aanzien. E Van der Schee DMJ Delnoij, Zorgvisie 2005 20 28 29
11. Cochrane Complementary Medicine Field. E Manheimer B Berman, About The Cochrane Collaboration (Fields) 2008 2 E000052
12. Vertrouwen in de GGZ: meer duidelijkheid gevraagd. RD Friele PFM Verhaak M Andela, MGv 2000 55 122 133
13. Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg, De zorgverlening aan S.M.: een voorbeeldcasus. Den Haag 2004
14. Public trust in health care: a performance indicator. E Van der Schee PP Groenewegen RD Friele, J Health Organ Manag 2006 20 468 476 10.1108/ 14777260610701821 17087406
15. Public trust in health care: A comparison of Germany, The Netherlands and England and Wales. E Van der Schee B Braun M Calnan M Schnee PP Groenewegen, Health Policy 2007 81 56 67 10.1016/j.healthpol.2006.04.004 16777257
16. Does trust in health care influence the use of complementary and alternative medicine by chronically ill people? A Van den Brink-Muinen PM Rijken, BMC Public Health 2006 6 188 10.1186/1471-2458-6-188 16848897
17. The impact of managed care on patients' trust in medical care and their physicians. D Mechanic M Schlesinger, JAMA 1996 275 1693 1697 10.1001/jama.275.21.1693 8637148
18. Health and media: an overview. C Seale, Sociol Health Illn 2003 25 513 531 10.1111/1467-9566.t01-1-00356 12919443
19. The role of the media in steering public opinion on healthcare issues. E Benelli, Health Policy 2003 63 179 186 10.1016/S0168-8510(02)00064-7 12543530
20. A scoping review of research on complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) and the mass media: Looking back, moving forward. LC Weeks T Strudholm, BMC Complement Altern Med 2008 8 43 10.1186/1472-6882-8-43 18638413
21. UK and Germany media differ over complementary medicine. E Ernst T Weihmayr, BMJ 2000 321 707 10.1136/bmj.321.7262.707 11202946
22. Complementing the alternative. B Vastag S Dube S McMahon K Alley-Swain, AEJMC Archives 1999 2005 141
23. Presenting the alternative: cancer and complementary and alternative medicine in the Canadian print media. L Weeks M Verhoef C Scott, Support Care Cancer 2007 15 931 938 10.1007/s00520-007-0290-3 17624558 (Pubitemid 350104597)
24. Embedded trust: control and learning. V Buskens W Raub, Group Cohesion, Trust and Solidarity 2002 19 167 202
25. Trusted information sources: The preferred option for complementary and alternative medicine users. A Robinson S Cooper, Complement Health Pract Rev 2007 12 120 138 10.1177/1533210107302776
26. The influence of significant others in complementary and alternative medicine decisions by cancer patients. J Ohlen LG Balneaves JL Bottroff ASA Brazier, Soc Sci Med 2006 63 1625 636 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.03.050 16725245
27. Alternative medicine or "alternative" patients: A qualitative study of patient-oriented decision-making process with respect to complementary and alternative medicine. MD Caspi RN Koithan BS Criddle, Decision Psychology 2004 24 64 79
28. Patinten aan het woord over alternatieve zorg. E Van der Schee D Delnoij H Sima M Willems, NIVEL/Consumentenbond 2003
29. 'Getting somewhere', feeling cared for: patients'perspectives on complementary therapies in the NHS. D Luff KJ Thomas, Complement Ther Med 2000 8 253 259 10.1054/ctim.2000.0392 11098201
30. Uptake of cervical cancer screening in the Netherlands is mainly influenced by women's beliefs about the screening and by the inviting organization. MA Tacken JC Braspenning RP Hermens PM Spreeuwenberg HJ Van den Hoogen DH De Bakker PP Groenewegen RP Grol, Eur J Public Health 2007 17 178 185 10.1093/eurpub/ckl082 16837520
31. Trust in complementary medicine: the case of cranial osteopathy. G Lee Treweek, Sociological Review 2002 50 48 68
32. Complementary and alternative medicine and patient choice in primary care. H Barnett, Qual Prim Care 2007 15 207 212
33. Why patients use alternative medicine: results of a national study. JA Astin, JCAMA 1998 279 1548 1553 10.1001/jama.279.19.1548 (Pubitemid 28233010)
34. Motivations for consulting complementary and alternative medicine practitioners: a comparison of consumers from 1997-8 and 2005. FM Sirois, BMC Complement Altern Med 2008 8 16 10.1186/1472-6882-8-16 18442414
35. Disclosure of CAM use to medical practitioners: a review of qualitative and quantitative studies. A Robinson MR McGrail, Complement Ther Med 2004 12 90 8 10.1016/j.ctim.2004.09.006 15561518
36. Disclosing complementary and alternative medicine use in the medical encounter: A qualitative study in women with breast cancer. SR Adler JR Fosket, J Fam Pract 1999 48 453 8 10386489
37. Complementary and alternative medicine The importance of doctor-patient communication. S Pappas A Perlman, Med Clin North Am 2002 86 1 10 10.1016/S0025-7125(03)00068-3 11795082
38. Confirmation bias: an ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. RS Nickerson, Review of General Psychology 1998 2 175 220 10.1037/1089-2680.2.2.175
39. An investigation of the health beliefs and motivations of complementary medicine clients. FM Sirois ML Gick, Soc Sci Med 2002 55 1025 1037 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00229-5 12220087
40. Treatment seeking and experience with complementary/alternative medicine: a continuum of choice. FM Sirois, J Altern Complement Med 2002 8 127 134 10.1089/107555302317371415 12006120
41. Statistics Netherlands. http://www.statline.nl