Comparison among minor invasive surgical approaches to hysterectomy for benign gynecological diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Chinese Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 323-338

  Huang, Zhi Hua ^a   Tu, Rui Qin ^a   Wu, Li Jun ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Hysterectomy; Laproscopical hysterectomy (LH); Meta analysis; Minilaporotomy hysterectomy (miniLPT); Systematic review; Vaginal hysterectomy (TVH)

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL INFECTION; BENIGN TUMOR; BIBLIOGRAPHIC DATABASE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; FEVER; GYNECOLOGIC DISEASE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LAPAROTOMY; LENGTH OF STAY; META ANALYSIS; MINILAPOROTOMY HYSTERECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SURGICAL APPROACH; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; VAGINAL HYSTERECTOMY; VAGINITIS; WOUND DEHISCENCE; WOUND HEALING IMPAIRMENT;

EID: 77950549716     PISSN: 16722531     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Falcone T, Walters M. Hysterectomy for benign disease. Obstet Gynecol, 2008, 111: 753-767.
2. Reich H, Roberts L. Laparoscopic hysterectomy incurrent gynaecological practice. Reviews in Gynaecological Practice, 2003, 3: 32-40. (Pubitemid 40432845)
3. Sculpher M, Manca A, Abbott J, et al. Cost effectiveness analysis of laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with standard hysterectomy. BMJ, 2004, 328(7432): 134-137.
4. Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2006, 2: 1-125.
5. Kluivers K, Ohnson N, Chien P, et al. Comparison of laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy in terms of quality of life A systematic review. EurJ Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2008, 136: 3-8.
6. Panici P, Zullo M, Angioli R, et al. Minilaparotomy hysterectomy a valid option for the treatment of benign uterine pathologies. EurJ Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2005, 119(2): 232-236. (Pubitemid 40460387)
7. Fanfani F, Fagotti A, Longo R, et al. Minilaparotomy in the management of benign gynecologic disease. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2005, 119: 232-236. (Pubitemid 40460388)
8. Muzii L, Basile S, Zupi E, et al. Laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus minilaparotomy hysterectomy:A prospective ,randomized, multicenter study. J Mini Inva Gynecol, 2007, 14: 610-615. (Pubitemid 47369704)
9. Drahonovsky J, Pan M, Baresova S, et al. Clinical comparison of laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy (LAVH) and total laparoscopy hysterectomy (TLH) in women with benign disease of uterus-a prospective randomized study. Ceska Gynekologie, 2006, 71(6):431-437. (Pubitemid 46051791)
10. Morelli M, Caruso M, Noia R, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy: a prospective randomized trial. Minerva Ginecologica, 2007, 59(2): 99-105. (Pubitemid 47066367)
11. Hwang J, Seow K, Tsai Y, et al. Comparative study of vaginal, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and abdominal hysterectomies for uterine myoma larger than 6 cm in diameter or uterus weighing at least 450 g a prospective randomized study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2002, 81(12): 1132-1138. (Pubitemid 35454361)
12. Ottosen C, Lingman G, Ottosen L, et al. Three methods for hysterectomy a randomised, prospective study of short term outcome. Br J Obstet Gynaecol, 2000, 107(11): 1380-1385.
13. Ayoubi M, Fanchin T, Monrozies X, et al. Respective consequences of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies on women's sexuality. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2003, 111: 179-182. (Pubitemid 37338738)
14. Soriano D, Goldstein A, Lecuru F, et al. Recovery from vaginal hysterectomy compared with laparoscopy-assisted vaginal hysterectomy. Acta Obstetricia Et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 2001, 80(4): 337-341.
15. Darai E, Soriano D, Kimata P, et al. Vaginal Hysterectomy for Enlarged Uteri,With or Without Laparoscopic Assistance:Randomized Study. Obstet Gynecol, 2001, 97(5): 712-716.
16. Sesti F, Ruggeri V, Pietropolli A, et al. Laparoscopically assisted vaginal hysterectomy versus vaginal hysterectomy for enlarged uterus. JSLS, 2008, 12(3): 246-251.
17. Sesti F, Calonzi F, Ruggeri V, et al. A comparison of vaginal, laparoscopic-assisted vaginal, and minilaparotomy hysterectomies for enlarged myomatous uteri. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2008, 103(3): 227-231.
18. Garry R, Fountain J, Mason S, et al. The eVALuate study: two parallel randomised trials, one comparing laparoscopic with abdominal hysterectomy, the other comparing laparoscopic with vaginal hysterectomy. BMJ, 2004, 328(7432): 129-133. (Pubitemid 38117458)
19. Ribeiro S, Ribeiro R, Santos N, et al. A randomized study of total abdominal, vaginal and laparoscopic hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet, 2003, 83(1): 37-43. (Pubitemid 37162828)
20. Meltomaa S, Makinen J, Taalikka M, et al. One-year cohort of abdominal, vaginal, and laparoscopic hysterectomies complications and subjective outcomes. J Am Coll Surg, 1999, 189(4): 389-396. (Pubitemid 29455679)
21. Sesti F, Capobianco F, Capozzolo T, et al. Isobaric gasless laparoscopy versus minilaparotomy in uterine myomectomy a randomized trial. Surg Endosc, 2008, 22: 917-923. (Pubitemid 351534064)
22. Panici P, Zullo M, Angioli R, et al. Surgery by minilaparotomy in benign gynecologic disease 1996. Obstet Gynecol,1996, 87(3): 456-459. (Pubitemid 26075091)
23. Makinen J, Johansson J, Tomas C, et al. Morbidity of 10110 hysterectomies by type of approach. Human Reproduction, 2001, 16(7): 1473-1478. (Pubitemid 32640326)
24. Miskry T, Magos A. Randomized, prospective, double-blind comparison of abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy in women without uterovaginal prolapse. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2003, 82: 351-358. (Pubitemid 36570719)
25. Vaisbuch E, Goldchmit C, Ofer D, et al. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: A comparative study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2006, 126: 234-238. (Pubitemid 43766304)
26. Persson P, Wijma K, Hammar M, et al. Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy-a randomised controlled multicentre study. BJOG, 2006, 113: 1023-1030. (Pubitemid 44310093)
27. Kluivers K, Hendriks J, Mol B, et al. Quality of life and surgical outcome after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for benign disease: A randomized, controlled trial. J Minim Invasive Gynecol, 2007, 14: 145-152. (Pubitemid 46401538)
28. Doesey J, Holtz P, Griffiths R, et al. cost and charges associated with three alternative technigues of hysterectomy. N Engl J Med, 1996, 335(7): 476-482. (Pubitemid 26269948)