Assessing the impact of bad smells using historical information

9th International Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution, IWPSE 2007, Held in Conjunction with the 6th ESEC/FSE Joint Meeting

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 31-34

  Lozano, Angela ^a   Wermelinger, Michel ^a   Nuseibeh, Bashar ^a  

^a OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Bad smells; Design defects; Design flaws; Empirical study; Software evolution; Software maintenance; Software quality; Source cede

Indexed keywords

CODE CLONE; DESIGN DEFECTS; DESIGN PRINCIPLES; DESIGN PROBLEMS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; HISTORICAL INFORMATION; MAINTENANCE ACTIVITY; POSITION PAPERS; REFACTORINGS; RELATIVE IMPORTANCE; ROOT CAUSE; SOFTWARE EVOLUTION; SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS;

CLONING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; DEFECTS; DESIGN; ODORS; TECHNICAL PRESENTATIONS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION;

EID: 77950547540     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Aversano, L., Cerulo, L., Penta, M.D.: How Clones are Maintained: An Empirical Study. In Proceedings of the 11th European Conference on Software Maintenance and Reengineering: IEEE Computer Society, 2007
2. Baldwin, C.Y., Clark, K.B.: Design Rules. vol.1: The Power of Modularity: The MIT Press, 2000.
3. Basili, V.R., Briand, L.C., Melo, W.L.: A validation of object-oriented design metrics as quality indicators. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 22(10) (1996), 751-761. (Pubitemid 126771690)
4. Brown, W.J., Malveau, R.C., Hays W. McCormick, I., Mowbray, T.J.: AntiPatterns: refactoring software, architectures, and projects in crisis. John Wiley \& Sons, Inc., 1998.
5. Fowler, M., Beck, K., Brant, J., Opdyke, W., Roberts, D.: Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison- Wesley Professional, 1999.
6. Gall, H., Jazayeri, M., Krajewski, J.: CVS release history data for detecting logical couplings. In Proc. of the Int'l Workshop on Principles of Software Evolution (IWPSE), 2003, pp. 13-23.
7. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design Patterns. Addison-Wesley Professional, 1995.
8. Girba, T., Ducasse, S., Marinescu, R., Ratiu, D.: Identifying Entities That Change Together. Presented at Workshop on Empirical Studies of Software Maintenance (WESS04), 2004.
9. Hassan, A.E., Holt, R.C.: Predicting change propagation in software systems. In Proc. of the Int'l Conf. on Software Maintenance (ICSM), 2004, pp. 284-293.
10. Kapser, C., Godfrey, M.W.: 'Cloning considered harmful' considered harmful. In Proc. of the Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering, Benevento, Italy, 2006.
11. Kim, M., Sazawal, V., Notkin, D., Murphy, G.: An empirical study of code clone genealogies. In Proc. of the European Software Engineering Conference, Lisbon, Portugal: ACM Press, 2005, pp. 187-196.
12. Kitchenham, B., Pfleeger, S.L.: Software quality: the elusive target. Software, IEEE, 13(1) (1996), 12-21.
13. Lehman, M.M., Belady, L.A.: Program Evolution: Processes of Software Change. London: Academic Press, 1985.
14. Lozano, A., Wermelinger, M., Nuseibeh, B.: A Revision of the Evil Clone: Measurements to Evaluate the Impact of Cloning in Maintainability. In submitted to Int'l Conf. of Softw. Maintenance: IEEE Computer Society, 2007.
15. Lozano, A., Wermelinger, M., Nuseibeh, B.: Evaluating the harmfulness of cloning: a change based experiment. In Proc. of the 4rd Int'l Workshop on Mining Software Repositories: IEEE Computer Society, 2007
16. Marinescu, R.: Measurement and Quality in Object- Oriented Design. Politehnica University of Timisoara, 2002.
17. Martin., R.C.: The Dependency Inversion Principle. In The C++ Report, 1996.
18. Meyer, B.: Applying ̀design by contract'. Computer, 25(10) (1992), 40-51.
19. Moha, N., Bouden, S., Guéhéneuc, Y.-G.: Correction of High-Level Design Defects with Refactorings. In In Proc. of the ECOOP Workshop on Object-Oriented Reengineering WOOR, 2006.
20. Moha, N., Guéhéneuc, Y.-G., Leduc, P.: Automatic Generation of Detection Algorithms for Design Defects. Presented at ASE, 2006.
21. Moha, N., Huynh, D.-L., Guéhéneuc, Y.-G.: Une taxonomie et un métamodèle pour la détection des défauts de conception. In Actes du colloque Langages et Modèles à Objets, 2006, pp. 201- 216.
22. Parnas, D.L.: Designing software for ease of extension and contraction. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 5(2) (March 1979. 1979), 128-138.
23. Parnas, D.L.: Software aging. In Proc. of the Int'l Conf. on Software Engineering (ICSE), Sorrento, Italy: IEEE Computer Society Press, 1994, pp. 279-287.
24. Ratiu, D., Ducasse, S., Girba, T., Marinescu, R.: Using History Information to Improve Design Flaws Detection. In Proc. of the European Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR): IEEE Computer Society, 2004, pp. 223- 232.
25. Trifu, A., Marinescu, R.: Diagnosing Design Problems in Object Oriented Systems. In Proc. of the Working Conf. on Reverse Engineering (WCRE), 2005, pp. 155-164. (Pubitemid 46090834)
26. Trifu, A., Seng, O., Genssler, T.: Automated Design Flaw Correction in Object-Oriented Systems. In Proc. of the European Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR): IEEE Computer Society, 2004, pp. 174-183.
27. Yu, P., Systä, T., Müller, H.A.: Predicting Fault-Proneness using OO Metrics: An Industrial Case Study. In Proc. of the European Conf. on Software Maintenance and Reengineering (CSMR): IEEE Computer Society, 2002, pp. 99-107.