Linking brain-wide multivoxel activation patterns to behaviour: Examples from language and math

NeuroImage

Volumn 51, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 462-471

  Raizada, Rajeev D S ^a   Tsao, Feng Ming ^b   Liu, Huei Mei ^c   Holloway, Ian D ^d   Ansari, Daniel ^d   Kuhl, Patricia K ^e  

^a Dartmouth College   (United States)

^b NATIONAL TAIWAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^c NATIONAL TAIWAN NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; BRAIN REGION; BRAIN SIZE; CLASSIFIER; COGNITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; LANGUAGE PROCESSING; LINEAR REGRESSION ANALYSIS; LOGISTIC REGRESSION ANALYSIS; MATHEMATICS; NEUROSCIENCE; NORMAL HUMAN; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE;

ALGORITHMS; BEHAVIOR; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; LANGUAGE; LINEAR MODELS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTS; MENTAL PROCESSES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 77950535667     PISSN: 10538119     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.01.080     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Aksoy S., Haralick R. Feature normalization and likelihood-based similarity measures for image retrieval. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 2001, 22(5):563-582.
2. Anscombe F. Graphs in statistical analysis. Am. Stat. 1973, 27(1):17-21.
3. Bishop C.M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning 2006, Springer, New York.
4. Carlson T.A., Schrater P., He S. Patterns of activity in the categorical representations of objects. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2003, 15(5):704-717.
5. Dehaene S., Molko N., Cohen L., Wilson A.J. Arithmetic and the brain. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 2004, 14:218-224.
6. Detre, G.J., Polyn, S.M., Moore, C.D., Natu, V.S., Singer, B.S., Cohen, J.D., Haxby, J.V., and Norman, K.A., (2006). The multi-voxel pattern analysis (MVPA) toolbox. Human Brain Mapping conference presentation., 12. Software available at http://www.csbmb.princeton.edu/mvpa/.
7. Fan, R.-E., Chang, K.-W., Hsieh, C.-J., Wang, X.-R., and Lin, C.-J., (2008). LIBLINEAR: A library for large linear classification. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 9, 1871-1874. Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/liblinear.
8. Formisano E., De Martino F., Bonte M., Goebel R. "Who" is saying "what"? Brainbased decoding of human voice and speech. Science 2008, 322(5903):970-973.
9. Fukunaga K. Introduction to Statistical Pattern Recognition 1990, Academic Press, Boston. 2nd ed.
10. Hastie T., Tibshirani R. Efficient quadratic regularization for expression arrays. Biostatistics 2004, 5(3):329-340.
11. Holloway, I.D., Ansari, D., (2009). Developmental specialization in the right intraparietal sulcus for the abstract representation of numerical magnitude. J. Cogn. Neurosci., Advance online publication: http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jocn.2009.21399.
12. Holloway, I.D., Price, G.R., and Ansari, D., (2010). Common and segregated neural pathways for the processing of symbolic and nonsymbolic numerical magnitude: AN fMRI study. NeuroImage, 49 (1), 1006-1017.
13. Isaacs E.B., Edmonds C.J., Lucas A., Gadian D.G. Calculation difficulties in children of very low birthweight: a neural correlate. Brain 2001, 124:1701-1707.
14. Kriegeskorte N., Goebel R., Bandettini P. Information-based functional brain mapping. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103(10):3863-3868.
15. Kriegeskorte N., Mur M., Bandettini P. Representational similarity analysis- connecting the branches of systems neuroscience. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 2008, 2:4.
16. Kriegeskorte N., Mur M., Ruff D.A., Kiani R., Bodurka J., Esteky H., Tanaka K., Bandettini P.A. Matching categorical object representations in inferior temporal cortex of man and monkey. Neuron 2008, 60(6):1126-1141.
17. Kriegeskorte N., Simmons W.K., Bellgowan P.S.F., Baker C.I. Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat. Neurosci. 2009, 12:535-540.
18. Marquand A., Howard M., Brammer M., Chu C., Coen S., Mourão-Miranda J. Quantitative prediction of subjective pain intensity from whole-brain fMRI data using Gaussian processes. NeuroImage 2010, 49(3):2178-2189.
19. Moyer R.S., Landauer T.K. Time required for judgements of numerical inequality. Nature 1967, 215:1519-1520.
20. Mussolin C., Volder A.D., Grandin C., Schlögel X., Nassogne M., Noël M. Neural correlates of symbolic number comparison in developmental dyscalculia. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 2009, 10.1162/jocn.2009.21237.
21. Pereira F., Mitchell T., Botvinick M. Machine learning classifiers and fMRI: a tutorial overview. NeuroImage 2009, 45:S199-209.
22. Price G.R., Holloway I., Räsänen P., Vesterinen M., Ansari D. Impaired parietal magnitude processing in developmental dyscalculia. Curr. Biol. 2007, 17(24):R1042-1043.
23. Raizada R.D.S., Tsao F.M., Liu H.-M., Kuhl P.K. Quantifying the adequacy of neural representations for a cross-language phonetic discrimination task: prediction of individual differences. Cereb. Cortex 2010, 20(1):1-12.
24. Raudys S., Jain A. Small sample-size effects in statistical pattern-recognition - recommendations for practitioners. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1991, 13(3):252-264.
25. Skurichina M., Duin R. Regularisation of linear classifiers by adding redundant features. Pattern Anal. Appl. 1999, 2:44-52.
26. Strother S.C., Anderson J., Hansen L.K., Kjems U., Kustra R., Sidtis J., Frutiger S., Muley S., LaConte S., Rottenberg D. The quantitative evaluation of functional neuroimaging experiments: the NPAIRS data analysis framework. NeuroImage 2002, 15(4):747-771.
27. van Eimeren L., Niogi S.N., McCandliss B.D., Holloway I.D., Ansari D. White matter microstructures underlying mathematical abilities in children. NeuroReport 2008, 19:1117-1121.
28. Vul E., Harris C., Winkielman P., Pashler H. Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 4:274-290.
29. Yamashita O., Sato M.-a., Yoshioka T., Tong F., Kamitani Y. Sparse estimation automatically selects voxels relevant for the decoding of fMRI activity patterns. NeuroImage 2008, 42(4):1414-1429.
30. Ye J., Janardan R., Park C.H., Park H. An optimization criterion for generalized discriminant analysis on undersampled problems. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004, 26(8):982-994.