Marking understanding versus receipting information in talk: Achso. and ach in german interaction

Discourse Studies

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 147-176

  Golato, Andrea ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

Author keywords

Ach; Achso; Cognition; Conversation analysis; German; Interjections; Oh

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950528826     PISSN: 14614456     EISSN: 14617080     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1461445609356497     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Antaki, C., Barnes, R. and Leudar, I. (2005) Diagnostic Formulations in Psychotherapy, Discourse Studies 7(6): 627-47.
2. Asmuß, B. (2002) Strukturelle Dissensmarkierungen in interkultureller Kommunikation: Analysen deutsch-dänischer Verhandlungen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
3. Atkinson, J.M. and Heritage, J. (eds) (1984) Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Auer, P. (2005) Delayed Self-repairs as a Structuring Device for Complex Turns in Conversation, in A. Hakulinen and M. Selting (eds) Syntax and Lexis in Conversation: Studies on the Use of Linguistic Resources in Talk-in-Interaction, pp. 75-102. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
5. Auer, P. and Uhmann, S. (1982) Aspekte der konversationellen Organisation von Bewertungen, Deutsche Sprache 10: 1-32.
6. Beach, W. and Dixson, C.N. (2001) Revealing Moments: Formulating Understandings of Adverse Experiences in a Health Appraisal Interview, Social Science & Medicine 52: 24-44.
7. Drew, P. (1997) Open Class Repair Initiators in Response to Sequential Sources of Troubles in Conversation, Journal of Pragmatics 28: 69-101.
8. Egbert, M. (1996) Context-sensitivity in Conversation: Eye Gaze and the German Repair Initiator "Bitte?", Language in Society 25(4): 587-612.
9. Egbert, M. (1997) Some Interactional Achievements of Other-initiated Repair in Multiperson Conversation, Journal of Pragmatics 27(5): 611-34.
10. Egbert, M. (1998) Miscommunication in Language Proficiency Interviews of First-year German Students: A Comparison with Natural Conversation, in R. Young and W.A. He (eds) Talking and Testing: Discourse Approaches to the Assessment of Oral Proficiency, pp. 147-72. Amsterdam /Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
11. Egbert, M. (2004) Other-initiated Repair and Membership Categorization - Some Conversational Events that Trigger Linguistic and Regional Membership Categorization, Journal of Pragmatics 36(8): 1467-98.
12. Egbert, M. (2009) Der Reparatur-Mechanismus in deutschen und interkulturellen Gesprächen. Mannheim: Verlag für Gesprächsforschung.
13. Egbert, M., Golato, A. and Robinson, J. (2009) 'Repairing Reference ', in J. Sidnell (ed.) Conversation Analysis: Contrastive Perspectives, pp. 104-32. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Fox, B.A., Hayashi, M. and Jasperson, R. (1996) Resources and Repair: A Cross-linguistic Study of Syntax and Repair, in E. Ochs, E.A. Schegloff and S.A. Thompson (eds) Interaction and Grammar, pp. 185-237. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Gardner, R. (1995) 'On Some Uses of the Conversational Token Mm', unpublished dissertation, University of Melbourne.
16. Gardner, R. (2002) When Listeners Talk: Response Tokens and Listener Stance. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
17. Gardner, R. (2007) The Right Connections: Acknowledging Epistemic Progression in Talk, Language in Society 36: 319-41.
18. Golato, A. (2000) An Innovative German Quotative for Reporting on Embodied Actions: Und ich so/Und er so and I'm Like/and He's Like, Journal of Pragmatics 32: 29-54.
19. Golato, A. (2002) German Compliment Responses, Journal of Pragmatics 34: 547-71.
20. Golato, A. (2005) Compliments and Compliment Responses: Grammatical Structure and Sequential Organization. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
21. Golato, A. and Betz, E. (2008) German Ach and Achso in Repair Uptake: A Resource to Sustain or Remove Epistemic Asymmetry, Zeitschrift für Sprachwissenschaft 27: 7-37.
22. Golato, A. and Fagyal, Z. (2008) Comparing Single and Double Sayings of the German Response Token Ja and the Role of Prosody - A Conversation Analytic Perspective, Research on Language and Social Interaction 41(3): 1-30.
23. Goodwin, C. (1986) Between and Within: Alternative Sequential Treatments of Continuers and Assessments, Human Studies 9(2/3): 205-18.
24. Harren, I. and Raitaniemi, M. (2006) The Sequential Structure of German Telephone Closings, paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Helsinki, Finland.
25. Hayashi, M. (2003) Joint Utterance Construction in Japanese Conversation. Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
26. Heritage, J. (1984) A Change-of-State Token and Aspects of its Sequential Placement, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 299-345. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. Heritage, J. (1998) Oh-prefaced Responses to Inquiry, Language in Society 27: 291-334.
28. Heritage, J. (2002) Oh-prefaced Responses to Assessments: A Method of Modifying Agreement/ Disagreement, in C.E. Ford, B.A. Fox and S.A. Thompson (eds) The Language of Turn and Sequence, pp. 196-224. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29. Heritage, J. (2005) Cognition in Discourse, in H. te Molder and J. Potter (eds) Conversation and Cognition, pp. 184-202. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Heritage, J. and Watson, D.R. (1979) Formulations as Conversational Objects, in G. Psathas (ed.) Everyday Language: Studies in Ethnomethodology, pp. 123-62. New York: Irvington Publishers.
31. Kitzinger, C. (2006) After Post-cognitivism, Discourse Studies 8(1): 67-83.
32. Lehtinen, E. (2005) Information, Understanding and the Benign Order of Everyday Life in Genetic Counseling, Sociology of Health and Illness 27(5): 575-601.
33. Lerner, G.H. (1987) 'Collaborative Turn Sequences: Sentence Construction and Social Action', unpublished doctoral dissertation, The University of California, Irvine.
34. Lerner, G.H. (1993) Collectivities in Action: Establishing the Relevance of Conjoined Participation in Conversation, Text 13: 213-45.
35. Lerner, G.H. (2002) Turn-sharing: The Choral Co-production of Talk-in-Interaction, in C.E. Ford, B.A. Fox and S.A. Thompson (eds) The Language of Turn and Sequence, pp. 225-56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Local, J. (1996) Conversational Phonetics: Some Aspects of News Receipts in Everyday Talk, in E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds) Prosody in Conversation. Interactional Studies, pp. 177-230. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Lynch, M. (2006) Cognitive Activities without Cognition? Ethnomethodological Investigations of Selected "Cognitive" Topics, Discourse Studies 8(1): 95-104.
38. Maynard, D.W. (2003) Bad News, Good News: Conversational Order in Everyday Talk and Clinical Settings. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
39. Maynard, D.W. (2006) Cognition on the Ground, Discourse Studies 8(1): 105-15.
40. Moore, R.J. and Maynard, D.W. (2002) Achieving Understanding in the Standardized Survey Interview: Repair Sequences, in D.W. Maynard, H. Houtkoop-Steenstra, N.C. Schaeffer and J. van der Zouwen (eds) Standardization and Tacit Knowledge. Interaction and Practice in the Survey Interview, pp. 281-313. New York: Wiley.
41. Pomerantz, A. (1984) Agreeing and Disagreeing with Assessments: Some Features of Preferred/ Dispreferred Turn Shapes, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action, pp. 225-46. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
42. Sacks, H. (1987 [1973]) 'On the Preferences for Agreement and Contiguity in Sequences in Conversation', in G. Button and J. Lee (eds) Talk and Social Organization, pp. 54-69. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
43. Schegloff, E.A. (1981) Discourse as an Interactional Achievement: Some Uses of "Uh Huh" and Other Things that Come between Sentences, paper presented at the Georgetown University Roundtable on Languages and Linguistics 1981; Analyzing Discourse: Text and Talk, Washington, DC.
44. Schegloff, E.A. (1984) On Some Questions and Ambiguities in Conversation, in J.M. Atkinson and J. Heritage (eds) Structures of Social Action. Studies in Conversation Analysis, pp. 28-52. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Schegloff, E.A. (1992) Repair after Next Turn: The Last Structurally Provided Defense of Intersubjectivity in Conversation, American Journal of Sociology 97(5): 1295-345.
46. Schegloff, E.A. (1996) Third Turn Repair, in G.R. Guy, C. Feagin, D. Schiffrin and J. Baugh (eds) Towards a Social Science of Language. Papers in Honor of William Labov, Vol. 2: Social Interaction and Discourse Structures, pp. 31-40. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
47. Schegloff, E.A. (2000) When "Others" Initiate Repair, Applied Linguistics 21(2): 205-43.
48. Schegloff, E.A. (2007) Sequence Organization in Interaction. A Primer in Conversation Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. Schegloff, E.A., Jefferson, G. and Sacks, H. (1977) The Preference for Self-correction in the Organization of Repair in Conversation, Language 53(2): 361-82.
50. Selting, M. (1987) Reparaturen und lokale Verstehensprobleme oder: Zur Binnenstruktur von Reparatursequenzen, Linguistische Berichte 108: 128-49.
51. Selting, M. (1988) The Role of Intonation in the Organization of Repair and Problem Handling Sequences in Conversation, Journal of Pragmatics 12: 293-322.
52. Selting, M. (1996) Prosody as an Activity-type Distinctive Signaling Cue in Conversation. The Case of So-called "Astonished Questions" in Repair-initiation, in E. Couper-Kuhlen and M. Selting (eds) Prosody in Conversation. Interactional Studies, pp. 231-70. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Selting, M. (2002) Lists: The Prosody of List Construction as an Interactional Resource, paper presented at the International Conference on Conversation Analysis, Copenhagen, 17-21 May.
54. Selting, M. (2007) Beendigung(en) als interaktive Leistung, in H. Hausendorf (ed.) Sprache als Prozeß, pp. 307-38. Tübingen: Narr.
55. Sidnell, J. (ed.) (2009) Conversation Analysis: Comparative Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Streeck, J. (1996) A Little Ilokano Grammar as it Appears in Interaction, Journal of Pragmatics 26: 189-213.
57. Streeck, J. (2002) Grammars, Words, and Embodied Meanings: On the Uses and Evolution of So and Like, Journal of Communication 52(3): 581-96.
58. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2002) A Conversation Analytical Study of Telephone Conversation Openings between Native and Nonnative Speakers, Journal of Pragmatics 34: 1807-32.
59. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2006) Request Sequences: The Intersection of Grammar, Interaction and Social Context. Amsterdam/Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
60. Taleghani-Nikazm, C. (2008) How and When are New Conversational Matters Brought into the Conversation?, paper presented at the Convention of the National Communication Association, San Diego, CA, 20-4 November.
61. Te Molder, H. and Potter, J. (eds) (2005) Conversation and Cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Wilkinson, S. and Kitzinger, C. (2006) Surprise as an Interactional Achievement: Reaction Tokens in Conversation, Social Psychology Quarterly 69(2): 150-82.