In defence of ourselves: The effects of defensive processing on attitudinal phenomena

The Scope of Social Psychology: Theory and Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 65-86

  Eagly, Alice H ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950527007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203965245     Document Type: Chapter

References (69)

1. Abelson, R. P (1968). Psychological implication. In R. P. Abelson, E. Aronson, W.J. McGuire, T. M. Newcomb, M. J. Rosenberg, & P. H. Tannenbaum (Eds.), Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 112-139). Chicago: Rand McNally.
2. Biek, M., Wood, W., & Chaiken, S (1996). Working knowledge, cognitive processing, and attitudes: On the determinants of bias. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 547-556.
3. Boninger, D. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Berent, M. K (1995). Origins of attitude importance: Self-interest, social identification, and value relevance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 61-80.
4. Briñol, P., & Petty, R. E (2005). Individual differences in attitude change. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes and attitude change (pp. 575-616). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
5. Chaiken, S (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752-766.
6. Chaiken, S (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M. P. Zanna, J. M. Olson, & C. P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
7. Chaiken, S., Giner-Sorolla, R., & Chen, S (1996). Beyond accuracy: Defense and impression motives in heuristic and systematic information processing. In P. M.Gollwitzer & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 553-578). New York: Guilford Press.
8. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
9. Chaiken, S., & Stangor, C (1987). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 38, 575-630.
10. Chaiken, S., Wood, W. L., & Eagly, A. H (1996). Principles of persuasion. In E.T. Higgins & A. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 702-742). New York: Guilford Press.
11. Chen, S., & Chaiken, S (1999). The heuristic-systematic model in its broader context.In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73-96). New York: Guilford Press.
12. Chen, S., Shechter, D., & Chaiken, S (1996). Getting at the truth or getting along: Accuracy versus impression motivated heuristic and systematic processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 262-275.
13. Cho, H., & Boster, F. J (2005). Development and validation of value-, outcome-, and impression-relevant involvement scales. Communication Research, 32, 235-264.
14. Cialdini, R. B., & Petty, R. E (1981). Anticipatory opinion effects. In R. E. Petty, T. M. Ostrom, & T. C. Brock (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 217-235).Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
15. Darke, P. R., & Chaiken, S (2005). The pursuit of self-interest: Self-interest bias in attitude judgment and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 864-883.
16. Das, E. H. H. J., de Wit, J. B. F., & Stroebe, W (2003). Fear appeals motivate acceptance of action recommendations: Evidence for a positive bias in the processing of persuasive messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 650-664.
17. De Hoog, N (2005). Fear-arousing communications and persuasion: The impact of vulnerability on processing and accepting fear appeals Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Utrecht University, The Netherlands.
18. De Hoog, N., Stroebe, W., & de Wit, J. B. F (2005). The impact of fear appeals on the processing and acceptance of action recommendations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 24-33.
19. Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51, 629-636.
20. Dillard, J. P., & Hunter, J. E (1989). On the use and interpretation of the Emotional Empathy Scale, the Self-Consciousness Scales, and the Self-Monitoring Scale.Communication Research, 16, 104-129.
21. Ditto, P. H (1998). Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 53-69.
22. Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. L (1992). Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568-584.
23. Eagly, A. H (1992). Uneven progress: Social psychology and the study of attitudes.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 693-710.
24. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S (1993). The psychology of attitudes Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
25. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S (1995). Attitude strength, attitude structure, and resistance to change. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 413-432). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
26. Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S (1998). Attitude structure and function. In D. Gilbert, S. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 269-322). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Eagly, A. H., Chen, S., Chaiken, S., & Shaw-Barnes, K (1999). The impact of attitudes on memory: An affair to remember. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 64-89.
28. Eagly, A. H., Chen, S., Kulesa, P., & Chaiken, S (2001). Do attitudes affect memory?Tests of the congeniality hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 5-9.
29. Eagly, A. H., Kulesa, P., Brannon, L. A., Shaw-Barnes, K., & Hutson-Comeaux, S (2000). Why counterattitudinal messages are as memorable as proattitudinal messages: The importance of active defense against attack. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1392-1408.
30. Edwards, K., & Smith, E. E (1996). A disconfirmation bias in the evaluation of arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 5-24.
31. Festinger, L (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
32. French, J. R. P. Jr., & Raven, B (1959). The bases of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150-167). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
33. Greenwald, A. G., & Sakumura, J. S (1967). Attitude and selective learning: Where are the phenomena of yesteryear? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 7, 387-397.
34. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H (1989). Effects of involvement on persuasion: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 106, 290-314.
35. Johnson, B. T., & Eagly, A. H (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Types, traditions, and the evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 375-384.
36. Johnson, B. T., Lin, H. Y., Symons, C. S., Campbell, L. A., & Ekstein, F (1995). Initial beliefs and attitudinal latitudes as factors in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21, 502-511.
37. Jones, E. E (1990). Interpersonal perception New York: W. H. Freeman.
38. Katz, D (1960). The functional approach to the study of attitudes. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 163-204.
39. Kelman, H. C (1958). Compliance, identification, and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 2, 51-60.
40. Kelman, H. C (1961). Processes of attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, 57-78.
41. Kunda, Z (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480-498.
42. Leippe, M. R., & Elkin, R. A (1987). When motives clash: Issue involvement and response involvement as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 269-278.
43. Leventhal, H (1970). Findings and theory in the study of fear communications. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 119-186). New York: Academic Press.
44. Levin, K. D., Nichols, D. R., & Johnson, B. T (2000). Involvement and persuasion: Attitude functions for the motivated processor. In G. R. Maio & J. M. Olson (Eds.), Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 163-194). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
45. Levine, J. M., & Murphy, G (1943). The learning and forgetting of controversial material. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 507-517.
46. Liberman, A., & Chaiken, S (1992). Defensive processing of personally relevant health messages. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 669-679.
47. Lundgren, S. R., & Prislin, R (1998). Motivated cognitive processing and attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 715-726.
48. Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M (1995). Involvement and persuasion: Evidence for different types of involvement. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 27, 64-78.
49. Miller, D. T., & Ross, M (1975). Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction? Psychological Bulletin, 82, 213-225.
50. Nienhuis, A. E., Manstead, A. S. R., & Spears, R (2001). Multiple motives and persuasive communication: Creative elaboration as a result of impression motivation and accuracy motivation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 118-132.
51. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979a). Effects of forewarning of persuasive intent and involvement on cognitive responses and persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 5, 173-176.
52. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979b). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915-1926.
53. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (198l). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches Dubuque, IA: Brown.
54. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
55. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367-374.
56. Petty, R. E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Goldman, R (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41, 847-855.
57. Prislin, R., & Wood, W (2005). Social influence in attitudes and attitude change. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes and attitude change (pp. 671-706). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
58. Reed, M. B., & Aspinwall, L. G (1998). Self-affirmation reduces biased processing of health-risk information. Motivation and Emotion, 22, 99-132.
59. Schlenker, B. R (1982). Translating actions into attitudes: An identity-analytic approach to the explanation of social conduct. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 15, pp. 193-247). New York: Academic Press.
60. Sherif, C. W., & Sherif, M. (Eds.) (1967). Attitude, ego-involvement, and change New York: Wiley.
61. Sherif, C. W., Sherif, M., & Nebergall, R. E (1965). Attitude and attitude change Philadelphia: Saunders.
62. Sherif, M., & Cantril, H (1947). The psychology of ego-involvements: Social attitudes and identifications New York: Wiley.
63. Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. I (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
64. Smith, M. B., Bruner, J. S., & White, R. W (1956). Opinions and personality New York: Wiley.
65. Stroebe, W (2000). Social psychology and health (2nd ed.). Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
66. Witte, K (1992). Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model. Communication Monographs, 59, 329-349.
67. Wood, W., Rhodes, N., & Biek, M (1995). Working knowledge and attitude strength: An information-processing analysis. In R. E. Petty & J. A. Krosnick (Eds.), Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 283-313). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.
68. Zimbardo, P. G (1960). Involvement and communication discrepancy as determinants of opinion conformity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 86-94.
69. Zuwerink, J. R., & Devine, P. G (1996). Attitude importance and resistance to persuasion: It's not just the thought that counts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 931-944.