A maximum test for the analysis of ordered categorical data

Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 592-593

  Neuhäeuser, Markus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES KOBLENZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Exact test; Maximum test; Ordered categorical data; Scores

Indexed keywords

EID: 77950524994     PISSN: 15389472     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22237/jmasm/1257034980     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Berger, V. W. (2007). [Reply to Senn (2007).] Biometrics, 63, 298-299.
2. Gregoire, T. G., & Driver, B. L. (1987). Analysis of ordinal data to detect population differences. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 159-165.
3. Ivanova, A., & Berger, V. W. (2001). Drawbacks to integer scoring for ordered categorical data. Biometrics, 57, 567-570.
4. Liu, I., & Agresti, A. (2005). The analysis of ordered categorical data: An overview and a survey of recent developments. Test, 14, 1-73.
5. Neuhäuser, M., & Hothorn, L. A. (2006). Maximum tests are adaptive permutation tests. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 5, 317-322.
6. Rabbee, N., Coull, B. A., Mehta, C., Patel, N., & Senchaudhuri, P. (2003). Power and sample size for ordered categorical data. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 12, 73-84.
7. Rasmussen, J. L. (1989). Analysis of Likert-scale data: a reinterpretation of Gregoire and Driver. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 167-170.
8. Senn, S. (2007). Drawbacks to non-integer scoring for ordered categorical data. Biometrics, 63, 296-298.
9. Sheu, C.-F. (2002). Fitting mixedeffects models for repeated ordinal outcomes with the NLMIXED procedure. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 151-157.