Completion mucosectomy for retained rectal mucosa following restorative proctocolectomy with double-stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Volumn 14, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 562-569

  Litzendorf, Maria E ^a   Stucchi, Arthur F ^a   Wishnia, Susana ^a   Lightner, Amy ^a   Becker, James M ^a  

^a BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Completion mucosectomy; Handsewn anastomosis; Ileoanal anastomosis; IPAA; Restorative proctocolectomy; Stapled anastomosis

Indexed keywords

ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; COLON POLYPOSIS; COLON POUCH; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTESTINE MUCOSA; MALE; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROCTOCOLECTOMY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL STAPLING; TENSILE STRENGTH; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULCERATIVE COLITIS;

ADENOMATOUS POLYPOSIS COLI; ANAL CANAL; ANASTOMOSIS, SURGICAL; COLITIS, ULCERATIVE; COLONIC POUCHES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCTOCOLECTOMY, RESTORATIVE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGICAL STAPLING; TENSILE STRENGTH; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77950520061     PISSN: 1091255X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11605-009-1099-9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Kirsner JB. Historical origins of medical and surgical therapy of inflammatory bowel disease. Lancet 1998; 352: 1303-1305.
2. Brooke BN. The management of an ileostomy, including its complications. Lancet 1952; 2: 102-104.
3. Kock NG. Intra-abdominal "reservoir" in patients with permanent ileostomy. Preliminary observations on a procedure resulting in fecal "continence" in five ileostomy patients. Arch Surg 1969; 99: 223-231.
4. Ravitch MM, Sabiston DL Jr. Anal ileostomy with preservation of the sphincter: a proposed operation in patients requiring total colectomy for benign lesions. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1947; 84: 1095-1099.
5. Utsunomiya J, Iwama T, Imajo M et al. Total colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and ileoanal anastomosis. Dis Colon Rectum 1980; 23: 459-466.
6. Parks AG, Nicholls RJ. Proctocolectomy without ileostomy for ulcerative colitis. Br Med J 1978; 2: 85-88.
7. Heppell J, Kelly KA, Phillips SF et al. Physiologic aspects of continence after colectomy, mucosal proctectomy, and endorectal ileo-anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 1982; 195: 435-443.
8. Heppell J. Physiopathologic aspects of ileal reservoirs. Can J Surg 1987; 30: 363-364.
9. Becker JM, Stucchi AF. Proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis. J Gastrointest Surg 2004; 8: 376-386.
10. Becker JM, Stucchi AF. Ulcerative colitis. In Zinner MJ, ed. Maingot's Abdominal Operations, 11th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2006, pp 551-587.
11. Bach SP, Mortensen NJ. Revolution and evolution: 30 years of ileoanal pouch surgery. Inflamm Bowel Dis 2006; 12: 131-145.
12. Becker JM, Stucchi AF. Inherited colorectal polyposis syndromes. In Cameron JL, ed. Current Surgical Therapy, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2004, pp 200-211.
13. Holder-Murray J, Fichera A. Anal transition zone in the surgical management of ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 2009; 15: 769-773.
14. Heald RJ, Allen DR. Stapled ileo-anal anastomosis: a technique to avoid mucosal proctectomy in the ileal pouch operation. Br J Surg 1986; 73: 571-572.
15. Beck D. Benign and malignant rectal, anal and perianal problems. ACS Surgery: Principles and Practice (online version). Philadelphia: Decker, 2009.
16. Deen KI, Williams JG, Grant EA et al. Randomized trial to determine the optimum level of pouch-anal anastomosis in stapled restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 133-138.
17. Hallgren TA, Fasth SB, Oresland TO et al. Ileal pouch anal function after endoanal mucosectomy and handsewn ileoanal anastomosis compared with stapled anastomosis without mucosectomy. Eur J Surg 1995; 161: 915-921.
18. Lovegrove RE, Constantinides VA, Heriot AG et al. A comparison of hand-sewn versus stapled ileal pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) following proctocolectomy: a meta-analysis of 4183 patients. Ann Surg 2006; 244: 18-26.
19. Silvestri MT, Hurst RD, Rubin MA et al. Chronic inflammatory changes in the anal transition zone after stapled ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: is mucosectomy a superior alternative? Surgery 2008; 144: 533-537. discussion 537-539.
20. Tuckson W, Lavery I, Fazio V et al. Manometric and functional comparison of ileal pouch anal anastomosis with and without anal manipulation. Am J Surg 1991; 161: 90-95. discussion 95-96.
21. Ziv Y, Fazio VW, Church JM et al. Stapled ileal pouch anal anastomoses are safer than handsewn anastomoses in patients with ulcerative colitis. Am J Surg 1996; 171: 320-323.
22. Lian L, Kiran RP, Remzi FH et al. Outcomes for patients developing anastomotic leak after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis: does a handsewn vs. stapled anastomosis matter? Dis Colon Rectum 2009; 52: 387-393.
23. Miller R, Bartolo DC, Orrom WJ et al. Improvement of anal sensation with preservation of the anal transition zone after ileoanal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. Dis Colon Rectum 1990; 33: 414-418.
24. Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Lavery IC et al. Evaluation of the learning curve in ileal pouch-anal anastomosis surgery. Ann Surg 2005; 241: 262-268.
25. Slors JF, Ponson AE, Taat CW et al. Risk of residual rectal mucosa after proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal reconstruction with the double-stapling technique. Postoperative endoscopic follow-up study. Dis Colon Rectum 1995; 38: 207-210.
26. Vrouenraets BC, van Duijvendijk P, Bemelman WA et al. Adenocarcinoma in the anal canal after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis using a double-stapled technique: report of two cases. Dis Colon Rectum 2004; 47: 530-534.
27. Fichera A, Ragauskaite L, Silvestri MT et al. Preservation of the anal transition zone in ulcerative colitis. Long-term effects on defecatory function. J Gastrointest Surg 2007; 11: 1647-1652. discussion 1652-1643.