Proximity of the femoral neurovascular bundle during hip resurfacing

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 471-474

  Davis, Edward T ^a   Gallie, Price A ^b   James, Steven L ^a   Waddell, James P ^b   Schemitsch, Emil H ^b  

^a ROYAL ORTHOPAEDIC HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b ST MICHAEL'S HOSPITAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Complications of hip resurfacing; Hip resurfacing; Hip surface arthroplasty; Neurovascular anatomy; Neurovascular injury

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CADAVER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FEMORAL NERVE; FEMORAL VEIN; HIP ARTHROPLASTY; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP RESURFACING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; JOINT CAPSULOTOMY; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT POSITIONING; SURGICAL ANATOMY; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; CADAVER; FEMALE; FEMORAL ARTERY; FEMORAL NERVE; FEMORAL VEIN; FEMUR; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED;

EID: 77950517319     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.02.014     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Amstutz H.C., Ball S.T., Le Duff M.J., et al. Resurfacing THA for patients younger than 50 year: results of 2- to 9-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 460:159.
2. Daniel J., Pynsent P.B., McMinn D.J. Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2004, 86:177.
3. Treacy R.B., McBryde C.W., Pynsent P.B. Birmingham hip resurfacing arthroplasty. A minimum follow-up of five years. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:167.
4. National Joint Replacement Registry, 2007. Australian Orthopedic Association 2008. http://www.dmac.adelaide.edu.au/aoanjrr/publications.jsp?section=reports2007.
5. National Joint Registry for England and Wales 4th Annual Report http://www.njrcentre.org.uk.
6. Back D.L., Dalziel R., Young D., et al. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacings. An independent prospective study of the first 230 hips. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87:324.
7. Amstutz H.C., Beaule P.E., Dorey F.J., et al. Metal-on-metal hybrid surface arthroplasty: two to six-year follow-up study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004, 86-A:28.
8. McMinn D., Treacy R., Lin K., et al. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, (329 Suppl):S89.
9. De Smet K.A., Pattyn C., Verdonk R. Early results of primary Birmingham hip resurfacing using a hybrid metal-on-metal couple. Hip International 2002, 12:158.
10. Navarro R.A., Schmalzried T.P., Amstutz H.C., et al. Surgical approach and nerve palsy in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 1995, 10:1.
11. Slater N., Singh R., Senasinghe N., et al. Pressure monitoring of the femoral nerve during total hip replacement: an explanation for iatropathic palsy. J R Coll Surg Edinb 2000, 45:231.
12. Weale A.E., Newman P., Ferguson I.T., et al. Nerve injury after posterior and direct lateral approaches for hip replacement. A clinical and electrophysiological study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996, 78:899.
13. Simmons C., Izant T.H., Rothman R.H., et al. Femoral neuropathy following total hip arthroplasty. Anatomic study, case reports, and literature review. J Arthroplasty 1991, (6 Suppl):S57.