What makes a high quality clinical research paper?

Oral Diseases

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 313-315

  Groves, T ^a  

^a British Medical Journal Technology Assessment Group   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Medicine; Surgery

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; ETHICS; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; MEDICAL LITERATURE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; REGISTRATION; REVIEW; SCIENCE; WRITING; CLINICAL TRIAL (TOPIC); HUMAN; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; RESEARCH ETHICS; STANDARDS;

CLINICAL TRIALS AS TOPIC; ETHICS, RESEARCH; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PUBLISHING; WRITING;

EID: 77950510552     PISSN: 1354523X     EISSN: 16010825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2010.01663.x     Document Type: Review

References (11)

1. Altman DG (1994). The scandal of poor medical research. BMJ 308 : 283 284.
2. Bekelman JE, Li Y, Gross CP (2003). Scope and impact of financial conflicts of interest in biomedical research: a systematic review. JAMA 289 : 454 465.
3. Chan AW, Altman DG (2005). Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals. Lancet 365 : 1159 1162.
4. Dickersin K, Rennie D (2003). Registering clinical trials. JAMA 290 : 516 523.
5. Drazen JM, Van Der Weyden MB, Sahni P et al (2009). Disclosure of competing interests. BMJ 339 : b4144, doi :.
6. European Commission (2009). The rules governing medicinal products in the European Union. Clinical trials 10 Available at: http://ec.europa.eu/ enterprise/pharmaceuticals/eudralex/vol10-en.htm (accessed on 25 January 2010).
7. Jorgensen AW, Hilden J, Gotzsche PC (2006). Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review. BMJ 333 : 782 785. (Pubitemid 44583357)
8. Kassirer JP (2004). On the take: how medicine's complicity with big business can endanger your health. Oxford University Press
9. Merton RK (1942). The normative structure of science. In : Merton RK. ed. The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations. University Of Chicago Press
10. Plint AC, Moher D, Morrison A et al (2006). Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review. MJA 185 : 263 267.
11. US Food and Drug Administration (2007). Food and Drug Administration Amendments Act (FDAAA) of 2007. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/ RegulatoryInformation/Legislation/FederalFoodDrugandCosmeticActFDCAct/ SignificantAmendmentstotheFDCAct/FoodandDrugAdministrationAmendmentsActof2007/ default.htm (accessed on 25 January 2010).