Characteristics associated with Regional Health Information Organization viability

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 61-65

  Adler Milstein, Julia ^a   Landefeld, John ^b   Jha, Ashish K ^b,c,d  

^a HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d VA BOSTON HEALTHCARE SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ELECTRONIC DATA INTERCHANGE; FUNDING; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH SURVEY; HOSPITAL INFORMATION SYSTEM; HOSPITAL PHYSICIAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; ECONOMICS; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; INFORMATION SERVICE; MEDICAL RECORD; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; UNITED STATES;

EFFICIENCY, ORGANIZATIONAL; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HUMANS; INFORMATION SERVICES; LOGISTIC MODELS; MEDICAL RECORD LINKAGE; MEDICAL RECORDS SYSTEMS, COMPUTERIZED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; REGIONAL MEDICAL PROGRAMS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77950509344     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M3284     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Congressional Budget Office. Evidence on the costs and benefits of health information technology. 2008. http://www.cbo.gov/ftpdocs/91xx/doc9168/05-20-HealthIT.pdf (accessed 22 Aug 2008).
2. Walker J, Pan E, Johnston D, et al. The value of health care information exchange and interoperability. Health Aff (Millwood) 2005;24:w10-18.
3. Blumenthal D. Stimulating the adoption of health information technology. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1477-9.
4. Miller RH, Miller BS. The Santa Barbara County Care Data Exchange: what happened? Health Aff (Millwood) 2007;26:w568-80.
5. Adler-Milstein J, McAfee A, Bates DW, et al. The state of regional health information organizations: current activities and financing. Health Aff (Millwood) 2008;27:w60-9.
6. eHealth Initiative. 2008 survey on health information exchange. http://www.ehealthinitiative.org/HIESurvey/(accessed 10 Apr 2009).
7. Healthcare IT Transition Group. Funding RHIO startup and financing for life: the 2006 survey of Regional Health Information Organization Finance (public summary). http://www.healthcare-informatics.com/ME2/dirmod.asp?sid=&nm&type=news&mod=News&mid=9A02E3B96F2A415ABC72CB5F516B4C10&tier=3&nid=3672849E1D074C4ABD37D6C0B709F805 (accessed 12 Nov 2009).
8. Adler-Milstein J, Bates DW, Jha AK, et al. U.S. Regional health information organizations: progress and challenges. Health Aff (Millwood) 2009;28:483-92.
9. eHealth Initiative. Community directory. http://ccbh.ehealthinitiative.org/communities/states.aspx (accessed 23 May 2008).
10. Baldwin G. Sharing the data bridge in Cincinnati. Health Leaders Magazine 2005.
11. The complete NAHIT definition is available at http://www.npidentify.com/directory/index.php?main_page=document_product_info&cPath=66 &products_id=318&zenid=80a7htljrq27bttm5bavp5rmu3 (accessed 12 Nov 2009).
12. HIT Policy Committee. Final meaningful use objectives and measures: 2011-2013-2015. August 14, 2009. http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt/gateway/PTARGS_0_10741_88832_0_0_18/FINAL%20MU%20RECOMMENDATIONS% 20TABLE.pdf (accessed 16 Sep 2009).
13. Information Exchange Work Group. The scope of federal activity. 2009. http://healthit.hhs.gov/portal/server.pt?open=18&objID=878091&parentname= CommunityPage&parentid=53&mode=2&in_hi_userid=11113&cached=true (accessed 16 Sep 2009).