Comparison of margin assessment by radial and shave sections in wide local excision specimens for invasive carcinoma of the breast

Histopathology

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 573-580

  Hodi, Zsolt ^a   Ellis, Ian O ^a   Elston, Christopher W ^a   Pinder, Sarah E ^a   Donovan, Glynn ^a   MacMillan, R Douglas ^a   Lee, Andrew H S ^a  

^a NOTTINGHAM CITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Breast carcinoma; Margins

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CARCINOMA; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRADUCTAL CARCINOMA; INVASIVE CARCINOMA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMAL RESIDUAL DISEASE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TISSUE SECTION; TUMOR VOLUME;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CARCINOMA, DUCTAL, BREAST; CARCINOMA, INTRADUCTAL, NONINFILTRATING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MASTECTOMY; NEOPLASM, RESIDUAL;

EID: 77950509266     PISSN: 03090167     EISSN: 13652559     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2010.03518.x     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Kreike B, Hart AAM, van de Velde T et al. Continuing risk of ipsilateral breast relapse after breast-conserving therapy at long term follow-up. Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys. 2008 71 1014 1021.
2. Singletary SE. Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy. Am. J. Surg. 2002 184 383 393. (Pubitemid 35335942)
3. Guidelines working group of the National Coordinating Committee of Breast Pathology. Pathology reporting of breast disease.
4. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1991 19 403 410.
5. Ellis IO, Galea M, Broughton N, Locker A, Blamey RW, Elston CW. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. II. Histological type. Relationship with survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1992 20 479 489.
6. Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Galea M, O'Rourke S, Blamey RW, Elston CW. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer III. Vascular invasion: relationship with recurrence and survival in a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology 1994 24 41 47.
7. Guidi AJ, Connolly JL, Harris JR, Schnitt SJ. The relationship between shaved margin and inked margin status in breast excision specimens. Cancer 1997 79 1568 1573.
8. Wright MJ, Park J, Fey JV et al. Perpendicular inked versus tangential shaved margins in breast-conserving surgery: does the method matter? J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2007 204 541 549.
9. Borger J, Kemperman H, Hart A, Peterse H, van Dongen J, Bartelink H. Risk factors in breast-conservation therapy. J. Clin. Oncol. 1994 12 653 660.
10. Moore MM, Borossa G, Imbrie JZ et al. Association of infiltrating lobular carcinoma with positive surgical margins after breast-conservation therapy. Ann. Surg. 2000 231 877 882. (Pubitemid 30350246)
11. Park CC, Mitsumori M, Nixon A et al. Outcome at 8 years after breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapy for invasive breast cancer: influence of margin status and systemic therapy on local recurrence. J. Clin. Oncol. 2000 18 1668 1675.
12. Asgeisson KS, Nasr R, Morgan DAL et al. Breast-conserving surgery: selection criteria and local recurrence - Nottingham 1979-2002 (abstract). Eur. J. Cancer 2003 1 (Suppl. 4 6.