Performance aware open-world software in a 3-layer architecture

WOSP/SIPEW'10 - Proceedings of the 1st Joint WOSP/SIPEW International Conference on Performance Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 49-56

  Perez Palacin, Diego ^a   Merseguer, José ^a   Bernardi, Simona ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURIN   (Italy)

Author keywords

Open world software; Petri nets; Self managed systems; Software components; Uml marte

Indexed keywords

3-LAYER ARCHITECTURES; ARCHITECTURAL APPROACH; FEASIBLE SOLUTION; ON-DEMAND; PERFORMANCE PREDICTION; SERVICE TIME; SOFTWARE EXECUTION; SOFTWARE SERVICES; SYSTEMS SOFTWARE; THREELAYER ARCHITECTURE;

FORECASTING; GRAPH THEORY; PETRI NETS; SAILING VESSELS;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 77950463588     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1712605.1712614     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. L. Baresi, C. Ghezzi, and S. Guinea. Smart monitors for composed services. In 2nd International Conference on Service Oriented Computing, pages 193-202, New York, NY, USA, 2004. ACM.
2. L. Baresi, E. D. Nitto, and C. Ghezzi. Toward open-world software: Issue and challenges. Computer, 39(10):36-43, 2006. (Pubitemid 44593689)
3. D. Garlan and B. Schmerl. Model-based adaptation for self-healing systems. In WOSS '02, pages 27-32, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.
4. E. Gat, R. P. Bonnasso, R. Murphy, and A. Press. On three-layer architectures. In Artificial Intelligence and Mobile Robots, pages 195-210. AAAI Press, 1997.
5. C. Ghezzi and G. Tamburrelli. Predicting performance properties for open systems with kami. In QoSA, volume 5581 of LNCS, pages 70-85. Springer, 2009.
6. The GreatSPN tool. http://www.di.unito.it/greatspn.
7. J. Kramer and J. Magee. Self-managed systems: an architectural challenge. In FOSE '07: 2007 Future of Software Engineering, pages 259-268, Washington, DC, USA, 2007. IEEE Computer Society.
8. J. Kramer and J. Magee. A Rigorous Architectural Approach to Adaptive Software Engineering. Journal of Computer Science and Technology, 24(2):183-188, March 2009.
9. R. Laddaga and P. Robertson. Self adaptive software: A position paper. In SELF-STAR: International Workshop on Self-* Properties in Complex Information Systems, 2004.
10. D. Menascé and V. Dubey. Utility-based QoS brokering in service oriented architectures. In IEEE International Conference on Web Services, pages 422-430, July 2007.
11. D. Menascé, H. Ruan, and H. Gomaa. QoS management in service-oriented architectures. Performance Evaluation, 64(7-8):646-663, 2007. (Pubitemid 46601618)
12. Object Management Group, http://www.promarte.org. A UML Profile for MARTE., 2005.
13. P. Oreizy, N. Medvidovic, and R. N. Taylor. Architecture-based runtime software evolution. In ICSE '98, pages 177-186, Washington, DC, USA, 1998. IEEE Computer Society.
14. C. Patel, K. Supekar, and Y. Lee. A QoS oriented framework for adaptive management of web service based workflows. In DEXA, pages 826-835, 2003.
15. M. Sopitkamol and D. Menascé. A method for evaluating the impact of software configuration parameters on e-commerce sites. In WOSP'05, pages 53-64. ACM, 2005.