Preventing colorectal cancer and cancer mortality with colonoscopy: What we know and what we dont know

Endoscopy

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 320-323

  Rex, D K ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CANCER MORTALITY; COLON INJURY; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; DEPRESSED LESION; EDITORIAL; FLAT LESION; INTESTINE PREPARATION; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SERRATED LESION;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; HUMANS;

EID: 77950439441     PISSN: 0013726X     EISSN: 14388812     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1244067     Document Type: Editorial

References (53)

1. Baxter N N., Goldwasser M A., Paszat L F. et al. Association of colonoscopy and death from colorectal cancer. Ann Intern Med 2009 150 1-8
2. Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V et al. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010 102 89-95
3. Singh G, Gerson L B., Wang H et al. Screening colonoscopy, colorectal cancer and gender: an unfair deal for the fair sex? Gastrointest Endosc 2007 65 AB100
4. Arain M A., Sawhney M, Sheikh S et al. CIMP status of interval colon cancers: another piece to the puzzle. Am J Gastroenterol 2009 DOI:10.1038/ajg.2009.699
5. Rex D K. Maximizing detection of adenomas and cancers during colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 2866-2877
6. de Groen P, Szarka L, Francis D et al. Random video file peer review to assess quality of colonoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2008 103 S551-0
7. Froehlich F, Wietlisbach V, Gonvers J J. et al. Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 61 378-384 (Pubitemid 40349029)
8. Harewood G C., Sharma V K., de Garmo P. Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 58 76-79 (Pubitemid 38208751)
9. Parra-Blanco A, Nicolas-Perez D, Gimeno-Garcia A et al. The timing of bowel preparation before colonoscopy determines the quality of cleansing, and is a significant factor contributing to the detection of flat lesions: a randomized study. World J Gastroenterol 2006 12 6161-6166 (Pubitemid 44688165)
10. Bianco M, Cipolletta L, Rotondano G, Buffoli F. The cooperative Flat Lesions Italian Network (FLIN). Prevalence of nonpolypoid colorectal neoplasia: a multicenter observational study. Endoscopy 2010 42 279-285
11. Rostom A, Jolicoeur E, Dube C et al. A randomized prospective trial comparing different regimens of oral sodium phosphate and polyethylene glycol-based lavage solution in the preparation of patients for colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2006 64 544-552 (Pubitemid 44397052)
12. Aoun E, Abdul-Baki H, Azar C et al. A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 62 213-218 (Pubitemid 41021544)
13. Park J S., Sohn C I., Hwang S J. et al. Quality and effect of single dose versus split dose of polyethylene glycol bowel preparation for early-morning colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2007 39 616-619
14. Church J M. Effectiveness of polyethylene glycol antegrade gut lavage bowel preparation for colonoscopy - timing is the key! Dis Colon Rectum 1998 41 1223-1225
15. El Sayed A M., Kanafani Z A., Mourad F H. et al. A randomized single-blind trial of whole versus split-dose polyethylene glycol-electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 58 36-40
16. Frommer D. Cleansing ability and tolerance of three bowel preparations for colonoscopy. Dis Colon Rectum 1997 40 100-104 (Pubitemid 27056407)
17. Abdul-Baki H, Hashash J G., Elhajj I I. et al. A randomized, controlled, double-blind trial of the adjunct use of tegaserod in whole-dose or split-dose polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution for colonoscopy preparation. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 68 294-300
18. Chiu H M., Lin J T., Wang H P. et al. The impact of colon preparation timing on colonoscopic detection of colorectal neoplasms a prospective endoscopist-blinded randomized trial. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 2719-2725
19. Gupta T, Mandot A, Desai D et al. Comparison of two schedules (previous evening versus same morning) of bowel preparation for colonoscopy. Endoscopy 2007 39 706-709 (Pubitemid 47299937)
20. Rex D K., Ulbright T M. Step section histology of proximal colon polyps that appear hyperplastic by endoscopy. Am J Gastroenterol 2002 97 1530-1534
21. Rex D K., Rahmani E Y. New endoscopic finding associated with hyperplastic polyps. Gastrointest Endosc 1999 50 704-706
22. Pabby A, Schoen R E., Weissfeld J L. et al. Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the Dietary Polyp Prevention Trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2005 61 385-391 (Pubitemid 40349030)
23. Farrar W D., Sawhney M S., Nelson D B. et al. Colorectal cancers found after a complete colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 4 1259-1264
24. Rex D K. Have we defined best colonoscopic polypectomy practice in the United States? Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007 5 674-677
25. Ellis K, Shiel M, Marquis S, Katon R. Efficacy of hot biopsy foreceps, cold micro-snare and microsnare with cautery techniques in the removal of diminutive colonic polyps [abstract]. Gastrointest Endosc 1997 45 AB107 (Pubitemid 127790872)
26. ASGE Standards of Practice Committee. Hot biopsy forceps. Gastrointest Endosc 1992 38 753-756
27. Brooker J C., Saunders B P., Shah S G. et al. Treatment with argon plasma coagulation reduces recurrence after piecemeal resection of large sessile colonic polyps: a randomized trial and recommendations. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 55 371-375
28. Mattar W, Rex D K. Large sessile adenomas are associated with a high prevalence of synchronous advanced adenomas. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2008 6 877-879
29. Rex D K., Lieberman D. ACG colorectal cancer prevention action plan: update on CT-colonography. Am J Gastroenterol 2006 101 1410-1413 (Pubitemid 43980610)
30. Rex D K. Narrow-band imaging without optical magnification for histologic analysis of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2009 136 1174-1181
31. Ignjatovic A, East J, Suzuki N et al. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncology 2009 10 1171-1178
32. Rex D K., Fennerty M B., Sharma P et al. Bringing new endoscopic imaging technology into everyday practice: what is the role of professional GI societies? Polyp imaging as a template for moving endoscopic innovation forward to answer key clinical questions. Gastrointest Endosc 2010 71 142-146
33. The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 2003 58 (6 Suppl) S3-S43 (Pubitemid 37541651)
34. Jaramillo E, Watanabe M, Slezak P, Rubio C. Flat neoplastic lesions of the colon and rectum detected by high-resolution video endoscopy and chromoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 1995 42 114-122
35. Tsuda S, Veress B, Toth E, Fork F. Flat and depressed colorectal tumours in southern Swedish population: a prospective chromoendoscopic and histopathological study. Gut 2002 51 550-555
36. Hurlstone D, Cross S, Adam I et al. A prospective clinicopathological and endoscopic evaluation of flat and depressed colorectal lesions in the United Kingdom. Am J Gastroenterol 2003 98 2543-2549 (Pubitemid 37448769)
37. Rembacken B, Fujii T, Cairns A et al. Flat and depressed colonic neoplasms: a prospective study of 1000 colonoscopies in the UK. Lancet 2000 355 1211-1214 (Pubitemid 30184529)
38. Kudo S, Lambert R, Allen J I. et al. Nonpolypoid neoplastic lesions of the colorectal mucosa. Gastrointest Endosc 2008 68 (4 Suppl) S3-47
39. Soetikno R M., Kaltenbach T, Rouse R V. et al. Prevalence of nonpolypoid (flat and depressed) colorectal neoplasms in asymptomatic and symptomatic adults. Jama 2008 299 1027-1035 (Pubitemid 351347059)
40. Brooker J, Saunders B, Shah S et al. Total colonic dye-spray increases the detection of diminutive adenomas during routine colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc 2002 56 333-338
41. Hurlstone D P., Cross S S., Slater R et al. Detecting diminutive colorectal lesions at colonoscopy: a randomised controlled trial of pan-colonic versus targeted chromoscopy. Gut 2004 53 376-380 (Pubitemid 38241333)
42. Le Rhun M, Coron E, Parlier D et al. High resolution colonoscopy with chromoscopy versus standard colonoscopy for the detection of colonic neoplasia: a randomized study. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2006 4 349-354 (Pubitemid 43343892)
43. Adler A, Pohl H, Papanikolaou I S. et al. A prospective randomised study on narrow-band imaging versus conventional colonoscopy for adenoma detection: does narrow-band imaging induce a learning effect? Gut 2008 57 59-64
44. Adler A, Aschenbeck J, Yenerim T et al. Narrow-band versus white-light high definition television endoscopic imaging for screening colonoscopy: a prospective randomized trial. Gastroenterology 2009 136 410-416
45. Kaltenbach T, Friedland S, Soetikno R. A randomised tandem colonoscopy trial of narrow band imaging versus white light examination to compare neoplasia miss rates. Gut 2008 57 1406-1412
46. Inoue T, Murano M, Murano N et al. Comparative study of conventional colonoscopy and pan-colonic narrow-band imaging system in the detection of neoplastic colonic polyps: a randomized, controlled trial. J Gastroenterol 2008 43 45-50 (Pubitemid 351324985)
47. Paggi S, Radaelli F, Amato A et al. The impact of narrow band imaging in screening colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2009 7 1049-1054
48. Rex D K., Helbig C C. High yields of small and flat adenomas with high-definition colonoscopes using either white light or narrow band imaging. Gastroenterology 2007 133 42-47
49. Kahi C, Anderson J, Waxman I et al. The American College of Gastroenterology high definition chromocolonoscopy study: findings and implications of colorectal cancer screening. Am J Gastroenterol 2009 104 S559
50. East J E., Stavrindis M, Thomas-Gibson S et al. A comparative study of standard vs. high definition colonoscopy for adenoma and hyperplastic polyp detection with optimized withdrawal technique. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2008 28 768-776
51. Spring K J., Zhao Z Z., Karamatic R et al. High prevalence of sessile serrated adenomas with BRAF mutations: a prospective study of patients undergoing colonoscopy. Gastroenterology 2006 131 1400-1407 (Pubitemid 44708940)
52. Winawer S J., Zauber A G., Fletcher R H. et al. Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society. Gastroenterology 2006 130 1872-1885 (Pubitemid 43668826)
53. Khalid O, Radaideh S, Cummings O W. et al. Reinterpretation of histology of proximal colon polyps called hyperplastic in 2001. World J Gastroenterol 2009 15 3767-3770