Impact of seating positions on group video communication

Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work, CSCW

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 177-186

  Yamashita, Naomi ^a   Hirata, Keiji ^a   Aoyagi, Shigemi ^a   Kuzuoka, Hideaki ^b   Harada, Yasunori ^a  

^a NTT Communication Science Laboratories   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

Computer supported cooperative work; Conversational analysis; Empirical study; Group to group meeting; Seating position; Video mediated communication

Indexed keywords

CO-LOCATED; CONVERSATIONAL ANALYSIS; EMPIRICAL STUDIES; GROUP ACTIVITIES; GROUP COMMUNICATIONS; SEATING POSITION; VIDEO COMMUNICATIONS; VIDEO-MEDIATED COMMUNICATIONS;

AUTOMOBILE SEATS; COMMUNICATION; COMPUTER SUPPORTED COOPERATIVE WORK; DISTRIBUTED COMPUTER SYSTEMS; IMAGE COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS; INTERACTIVE COMPUTER SYSTEMS;

GROUPWARE;

EID: 77950434778     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1460563.1460591     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. Armstrong, D. J. and Cole, P. Managing Distances and Differences in Geographically Distributed Work Groups. In Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. (eds) Distributed Work, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press (2002), 167-186.
2. Bly, S. A., Harrison, S. R. and Irwin, S. Media spaces: bringing people together in a video, audio, and computing environment. Communications of the ACM, 36(1), (1993), 28-46.
3. Buxton, W. A. S. Telepresence: Integrating shared Task and person spaces. Proceedings of Graphic Interface, 92, (1992), 816-821.
4. Cramton, C. D. Attribution in Distributed Work Groups. In Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. (eds) Distributed Work, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press (2002), 191-212.
5. Dourish, P., Adler, A., Bellotti, V., and Henderson, A. Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication. Computer-Supported Cooperative Work 5, 1 (1996), 33-62.
6. Fish, R. S., Kraut, R. E. and Chalfonte, B. L. The VideoWindow system in informal communication, Proceedings of CSCW'96, ACM Press (1990), 1-11.
7. Gaver, W. The affordances of media spaces for collaboration. Proceedings of CSCW'92, ACM Press (1992), 17-24.
8. Greenberg, J. The Role of Seating Position in Group Interaction: A Review, with Applications for Group Trainers. Group & Organization Management, 1(3), (1976), 310-327.
9. Hall, E. T. The Hidden Dimension, New York: Doubleday (1966).
10. Hare, A. P. and Bales, R. F. Seating Position and Small Group Interaction. Sociometry, (1963), 480-486.
11. Heath, C. and Luff, P. Disembodied Conduct: Communication Through Video in a Multi-media Office Environment. Proceedings of CHI'91, ACM Press, (1991), 99-103.
12. Howells, L.T. and Becker, S.W. Seating arrangement and leadership emergence. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 64, (1962), 148-150.
13. Huang, W., Olson, J. and Olson, G. Camera angle affects dominance in video-mediated communication. Extended Abstracts, CHI'02, (2002), 716-717.
14. Kendon, A. Some functions of gaze direction in social interaction. Acta Psychologica, 26, (1967), 1-47.
15. Kendon, A. Spatial Organization in Social Encounters: the F-formation System. A. Kendon, Ed., Conducting Interaction: Patterns of Behavior in Focused Encounters, Cambridge University Press, (1990), 209-237.
16. Kenyon, N. D., White, T. A. and Ried, G. M. Behavioral and user needs for teleconferencing. Proceedings of the IEEE, 73, (1985), 689-699.
17. Kiesler, S. and Cummings, J. N. What Do We Know about Proximity and Distance in Work Groups? A Legacy of Research. In Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. (eds) Distributed Work, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press (2002), 191-212.
18. Lafferty, J. C., Eady, P. M., & Elmers, J. The Desert Survival Problem. Plymouth, Michigan. Experimental Learning Methods (1974).
19. Nguyen, D. and Canny, J. MultiView: spatially faithful group video conferencing. Proceedings of CHI'05, ACM Press (2005), 799-808.
20. Nguyen, D. and Canny, J. MultiView: Improving Trust in Group Video Conferencing Through Spatial Faithfulness. Proceedings of CHI'07, ACM Press (2007), 1465-1474.
21. Orestrom, B. Turn-Taking in English conversation. Lund, Sweden: Liber, (1983).
22. Okada, K., Maeda, F. Ichikawa, Y. and Matsushita, Y. Multiparty videoconferencing at virtual social distance: MAJIC design. Proceedings of CSCW'94, ACM Press (1990), 385-393.
23. Olson, G. M. and Olson, J. S. Distance Matters. Human-Computer Interaction, 15, (2000), 139-179.
24. Olson, J. S., Teasley, S., Covi, L. and Olson, G. The (Currently) Unique Advantages of Collocated Work. In Hinds, P. and Kiesler, S. (eds) Distributed Work, Cambridge, MA, MIT Press (2002), 113-135.
25. Sacks, H., Schegloff, E., and Jefferson, G. A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking in conversation, Language, 50 (1974), 696-735.
26. Schegloff, E. A. Body Torque. Social Research, 65(3), (1998), 535-596.
27. Sellen, A. Buxton, B. and Arnott, J. Using spatial cues to improve videoconferencing. Proceedings of CHI'92, ACM Press (1992), 651-652.
28. Sommer, R. Personal Space. Englewood Cliffs, N. J.: Prentice-Hall, (1969).
29. Steinzor, B. The spatial factor in face to face discussion groups. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 45, (1950), 552-555.
30. Tang, J. C. Why Do Users Like Video? Studies of Multimedia-Supported Collaboration. Sun Microsystems Laboratories, Inc., Mountain View, CA, (1992).
31. Vertegaal, R., Weevers, I., Sohn, Changuk and Cheung, C. GAZE-2: conveying eye contact in group video conferencing using eye-controlled camera direction. Proceedings of CHI'03, ACM Press (2003),521-528.
32. Vertgaal, R., Van der Veer, G. C. and Vons, H. Effects of Gaze on Multiparty Mediated Communication. Proceedings of Graphic Interface 2000, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, (2000), 95-102.
33. Werkhoven, P. J., Schraagen, J. M., Punte, P. A. Seeing is believing: communication performance under isotropic teleconferencing conditions. Displays 22, 137-149.