Linking interventions to outcomes in area regeneration: The new deal for communities programme in England

Town Planning Review

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 151-172

  Foden, Mike ^a   Grimsley, Mike ^a   Lawless, Paul ^a   Wilson, Ian ^a  

^a SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECONOMIC REGENERATION; NEIGHBORHOOD; POLICY STRATEGY; STRATEGIC APPROACH; URBAN PLANNING; URBAN POLICY; URBAN RENEWAL;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 77950393171     PISSN: 00410020     EISSN: 1478341X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3828/tpr.2009.32     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Atkinson, R. and Moon, G. (1994), Urban Policy in Britain the City, the State and the Market, London, Macmillan.
2. Buck, N. (2001), 'Identifying neighbourhood effects on social exclusion', Urban Studies, 38, 2251-75.
3. Cochrane, A. (2007), Understanding Urban Policy: A Critical Approach, Oxford, Blackwell.
4. DEPARTMENT OF THE ENVIRONMENT (1994), Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy, London, HMSO.
5. DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2008a), New Deal for Communities: A Synthesis of New Programme-wide Evidence: 2006-07 (Research Report 39), London, Department of Communities and Local Government.
6. DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2008b), The NDC National Evaluation, The Six Case Studies, An Introduction, London, Department of Communities and Local Government.
7. DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2008c), Neighbourhood Management Pathfinders: Final Evaluation Report, London, Department of Communities and Local Government.
8. DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2009a), Residential Mobility and Outcome Change in Deprived Areas: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme, London, Department of Communities and Local Government.
9. DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2009b), Four Years of Change? Understanding the Experiences of the 2002-2006 New Deal for Communities Panel, London, Department of Communities and Local Government.
10. DCLG (DEPARTMENT FOR COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT) (2009c), An Overview of Crosssectional Change Data: 2002-2008: Evidence from the New Deal for Communities Programme, London, Department of Communities and Local Government.
11. DETR (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS) (1998), New Deal for Communities: Phase 1 Proposals: Guidance for Pathfinder Applicants, London, Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions.
12. DETR (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS) (2000a), Final Evaluation of City Challenge, London, Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions.
13. DETR (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS) (2000b), Towards an Urban Renaissance, Final report of the Urban Task Force, London, Department of Environment, Transportand the Regions.
14. DETR (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS) (2001a), New Deal for Communities Financial Guidance, London, Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions.
15. DETR (DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT, TRANSPORT AND THE REGIONS) (2001b), A Review of the Evidence Base for Regeneration Policy and Practice, London, Department of Environment, Transport and the Regions.
16. Dorling, D. (2001), 'Anecdote is the singular of data', Environment and Planning A, 33, 1335-40.
17. Gripaios, P. (2002), 'The failure of regeneration policy in Britain', Regional Studies, 36, 568-77.
18. Hall, S. G. (2003), 'The "Third Way" revisited: "New" Labour, spatial policy and the National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal', Planning, Practice and Research, 18, 265-77.
19. Hamedinger, A., Bartik, H., and Wolffhardt, A. (2008), 'The impact of EU area-based programmes on local governance: towards a "Europeanisation"?', Urban Studies, 45, 2669-87.
20. HM TREASURY, DEPARTMENT FOR BUSINESS, ENTERPRISE AND REGULATORY REFORM, COMMUNITIES AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT. (2007), Review of Sub-national Economic Development and Regeneration, London, HM Treasury.
21. Lawless, P. (2006), 'Area-based urban interventions: rationale and outcomes: the New Deal for Communities Programme in England', Urban Studies, 43, 1991-2011.
22. Leunig, T. and Swaffield, J. (2008), Cities Unlimited: Making Urban Regeneration Work, London, Planning Exchange.
23. Mcculloch, A. (2001), 'Ward level deprivation and individual social and economic outcomes in the British Household Panel Survey', Environment and Planning A, 33, 667-84.
24. NAO (NATIONAL AUDIT OFFICE) (2004), An Early Progress Report on the New Deal for Communities Programme, London, NAO.
25. NRU (NEIGHBOURHOOD RENEWAL UNIT)/ODPM (office of the deputy prime minister) (2005), The New Deal for Communities 2001-2005: An Interim Evaluation (Research Report 17), London, Neighbourhood Renewal Unit/Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
26. Oakley, D. and Tsao, H-S. (2006), 'A new way of revitalizing distressed urban communities? Assessing the impact of the federal Empowerment Zone program', Journal of Urban Affairs, 28, 443-71.
27. ODPM (office of the deputy prime minister) (2003), Sustainable Communities: Building for the Future, London, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
28. O'Reilly, D. (2007), 'Comments on Rhodes et al. (2005): some further thoughts on assessing the effects of area-based initiatives on local outcomes', Urban Studies, 44, 1145-53.
29. Oreopoulos, P. (2003), 'The long run consequences of living in a poor neighbourhood', The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 1533-75.
30. Parkinson, M., Champion, T., Evans, R., Et Al. (2006), State of the English Cities, London, Office of the Deputy Prime Minister.
31. Rhodes, J., Tyler, P. and Brennan, A. (2005), 'Assessing the effects of area based initiatives on local area outcomes: some thoughts based on the national evaluation of the Single Regeneration Budget in England', Urban Studies, 42, 1919-46.
32. Robson, B., Lymperopoulou, K., and Rae, A. (2008), 'People on the move: exploring the functional role of deprived neighbourhoods', Environment and Planning A, 40, 2693-714.
33. SEU (social exclusion unit) (1998), Bringing Britain Together: A National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal, London, Social Exclusion Unit.
34. SEU (social exclusion unit) (2001), National Strategy for Neighbourhood Renewal: Policy Action Team Audit, London, Social Exclusion Unit.
35. Shaw, K. and Robinson, E. (1998), 'Learning from experience? Reflections on two decades of British urban policy', Town Planning Review, 69, 49-63.
36. Turok, I. (2008), 'A new policy for Britain's cities: choices, challenges and contradictions', Local Economy, 23, 149-66.
37. Van Gent, W.P.C., Musterd, S., and Ostendorf, W. (2009), 'Disentangling neighbourhood problems: area-based interventions in Western European cities', Urban Research and Practice, 2, 53-67.
38. Varady, D., Raffell, J., Sweeny, S., and Denson, L. (2005), 'Attracting middle-income families in the HOPE IV public revitalisation program', Journal of Urban Affairs, 27, 149-64.