Norwegian version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview: Feasibility, acceptability and test-retest reliability in an acute psychiatric ward

European Psychiatry

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 172-177

  Mordal, J ^a   Gundersen, Ø ^b   Bramness, J G ^c,d  

^a LOVISENBERG DIAKONALE HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF NORTH NORWAY   (Norway)

^c Norwegian Centre for Dementia Research   (Norway)

^d NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Norway)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Feasibility; MINI; Psychiatric inpatients; Reliability; Structured diagnosis

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INVOLUNTARY COMMITMENT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MINI INTERNATIONAL NEUROPSYCHIATRIC INTERVIEW; NORWAY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT; PSYCHOLOGICAL RATING SCALE; PSYCHOSIS; SUBSTANCE ABUSE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; ALCOHOLISM; COMMITMENT OF MENTALLY ILL; COMORBIDITY; CRISIS INTERVENTION; CROSS-CULTURAL COMPARISON; FEASIBILITY STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INSERVICE TRAINING; INTERVIEW, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PSYCHIATRIC DEPARTMENT, HOSPITAL; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; PSYCHOMETRICS; PSYCHOTIC DISORDERS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STREET DRUGS; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TRANSLATING;

EID: 77950368624     PISSN: 09249338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2009.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Basco M.R., Bostic J.Q., Davies D., Rush A.J., Witte B., Hendrickse W., et al. Methods to improve diagnostic accuracy in a community mental health setting. Am J Psychiatry 2000, 157:1599-1605.
2. Endicott J. Good diagnoses require good diagnosticians: collecting and integrating the data. Am J Med Genet A 2001, 105:48-49.
3. Endicott J., Spitzer R.L., Fleiss J.L., Cohen J. The global assessment scale. A procedure for measuring overall severity of psychiatric disturbance. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1976, 33:766-771.
4. Gift A.G. Visual analogue scales: measurement of subjective phenomena. Nurs Res 1989, 38:286-288.
5. Hripcsak G., Heitjan D.F. Measuring agreement in medical informatics reliability studies. J Biomed Inform 2002, 35:99-110.
6. Kadri N., Agoub M., El Gnaoui S., Alami K.M., Hergueta T., Moussaoui D. Moroccan colloquial Arabic version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): qualitative and quantitative validation. Eur Psychiatry 2005, 20:193-195.
7. Kay S.R., Fiszbein A., Opler L.A. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull 1987, 13:261-276.
8. Lecrubier Y., Sheehan D.V., Weiller E., Amorim P., Bonora I., Sheehan K.H., et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI. Eur Psychiatry 1997, 12:224-231.
9. Lieberman P.B., Baker F.M. The reliability of psychiatric diagnosis in the emergency room. Hosp Community Psychiatry 1985, 36:291-293.
10. Miller P.R. Inpatient diagnostic assessments: 3. Causes and effects of diagnostic imprecision. Psychiatry Res 2002, 111:191-197.
11. Miller P.R., Dasher R., Collins R., Griffiths P., Brown F. Inpatient diagnostic assessments: 1. Accuracy of structured vs. unstructured interviews. Psychiatry Res 2001, 105:255-264.
12. Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Available at [cited 6 February 2009]. https://www.medical-outcomes.com/HTMLFiles/MINI/MINI.htm.
13. Norwegian version of Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Available at [cited 6 February 2009]. http://www.helsebiblioteket.no/Psykisk+helse.
14. Otsubo T., Tanaka K., Koda R., Shinoda J., Sano N., Tanaka S., et al. Reliability and validity of Japanese version of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci 2005, 59:517-526.
15. Pinninti N.R., Madison H., Musser E., Rissmiller D. MINI-International Neuropsychiatric Schedule: clinical utility and patient acceptance. Eur Psychiatry 2003, 18:361-364.
16. Rossi A., Alberio R., Porta A., Sandri M., Tansella M., Amaddeo F. The reliability of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-Italian version. J Clin Psychopharmacol 2004, 24:561-563.
17. Ruud T, Gråwe R, Hatling T. Akuttpsykiatrisk behandling i Norge - resultater fra en multisenterstudie. SINTEF Health, Oslo, Norway, October 2006. Available at [cited 6 February 2009]. http://www.sintef.no/upload/Helse/Psykisk%20helse/Pdf-filer/MAPWeb.pdf.
18. Sheehan D.V., Lecrubier Y., Sheehan K.H., Amorim P., Janavs J., Weiller E., et al. The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. J Clin Psychiatry 1998, 59:22-33.
19. Sheehan D.V., Lecrubier Y., Sheehan K.H., Janavs J., Weiller E., Keskiner A., et al. The validity of the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability. Eur Psychiatry 1997, 12:232-241.
20. Shrout P.E., Spitzer R.L., Fleiss J.L. Quantification of agreement in psychiatric diagnosis revisited. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1987, 44:172-177.
21. Tucker G.J. Putting DSM-IV in perspective. Am J Psychiatry 1998, 155:159-161.
22. Way B.B., Allen M.H., Mumpower J.L., Stewart T.R., Banks S.M. Interrater agreement among psychiatrist in psychiatric emergency assessments. Am J Psychiatry 1998, 155:1423-1428.
23. Zimmerman M., Mattia J.I. Psychiatric diagnosis in clinical practice: is comorbidity being missed?. Compr Psychiatry 1999, 40:182-191.
24. Zimmerman M., Mattia J.I. Principal and additional DSM-IV disorders for which outpatients seek treatment. Psychiatr Serv 2000, 51:1299-1304.