Challenges to estimating tree height via LiDAR in closed-canopy forests: A parable from Western Oregon

Forest Science

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 139-155

  Gatziolis, Demetrios ^a   Fried, Jeremy S ^b   Monleon, Vicente S ^b  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b US Forest Service   (United States)

Author keywords

Airborne laser scanning; Calibration; Pacific Northwest; Terrain modeling; Tree leaning

Indexed keywords

AIRBORNE LASER SCANNING; ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; CANOPY COVER; COMPLEX TERRAINS; DATA PREPROCESSING; DENSE NETWORK; FOREST TYPE; GROUND ELEVATION; LASER DATA; LIDAR DATA; LIGHT DETECTION AND RANGING; PACIFIC NORTHWEST; STANDARD ALGORITHMS; STEEP SLOPE; SUB-OPTIMAL PERFORMANCE; SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENTS; TEMPERATE RAINFOREST; TERRAIN MODELING; TREE HEIGHT;

CALIBRATION; ERRORS; LANDFORMS; LASER APPLICATIONS; OPTICAL RADAR;

FORESTRY;

ALGORITHMS; CALIBRATION; ERRORS; FILM; FOREST CANOPY; FORESTRY; LAND; LASERS; RADAR; TREE DIMENSIONS; TREES;

EID: 77950364415     PISSN: 0015749X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Aldred A.H., Hall J.K. 1975. Application of large-scale photography to a forest inventory. For. Chron. 51(1): 7 p.
2. Andersen H.E., McGaughey R.J., Reutebuch S.E. 2005. Estimating canopy fuel parameters using airborne LIDAR data. Rem. Sens. Environ. 94: 441-449.
3. Andersen H.E., Reutebuch S.E., McGaughey R.J. 2006. Rigorous assessment of tree height measurements obtained using airborne lidar and conventional field methods. Can. J. Rem. Sens. 32(5): 355-366.
4. Axelsson P.E. 1999. Processing of laser scanner data-Algorithms and applications. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 54(2-3): 138-147.
5. Baltsavias E.P. 1999. A comparison of between photogrammetry and laser scanning. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 54: 83-94.
6. Brackett M. 1977. Notes on TARIF tree-volume computation. DNR Report 24. State of Washington, Department of Natural Resources, Olympia, WA. 132 p.
7. Brandtberg T., Warner T.A., Landenberger R.E., McGraw J.B. 2003. Detection and analysis of individual leaf-off tree crowns in small footprint, high sampling density lidar data from the eastern deciduous forest in North America. Rem. Sens. Environ. 85(3): 290-303.
8. Chasmer L., Hopkinson C., Smith B., Treitz P. 2006. Examining the influence of changing laser pulse repetition frequencies on conifer forest canopy returns. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 72(12): 1359-1367.
9. Chen Q. 2007. Airborne lidar data processing and information extraction. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 73(2): 109-112.
10. Chen Q., Gong P., Baldocchi D.D., Xie G. 2007. Filtering airborne laser scanning with morphological methods. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 73(2): 171-181.
11. Clark M.L., Clark D.B., Roberts D.A. 2004. Small-footprint lidar estimation of sub-canopy elevation and tree height in a tropical rain forest landscape. Rem. Sens. Environ. 91: 68-89.
12. Elmqvist M., Jungert E., Lantz F., Persson Å., Söderman U. 2001. Terrain modelling and analysis using laser scanner data. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 34-3/W 4: 219-227.
13. Gaveau D., Hill R. 2003. Quantifying canopy height underestimation by laser pulse penetration in small-footprint airborne laser scanning data. Can. J. Rem. Sens. 29: 650-657.
14. Goovaerts P. 1997. Geostatistics for natural resources evaluation. Oxford University Press, New York, NY. 483 p.
15. Haralick R.M., Sternberg S.R., Zhuang X. 1987. Image analysis using mathematical morphology. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. PMI-9: 523-550.
16. Hinsley S.A., Hill R.A., Bellamy P.E., Baltzer H. 2006. The application of LiDAR in woodland bird ecology: climate, canopy structure and habitat quality, Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 72: 1399-1406.
17. Hodgson M.E., Jensen J.R., Schmidt L., Schill S., Davis B. 2003. An evaluation of LIDAR- and IFSAR-derived digital elevation models in leaf-on conditions with USGS Level 1 and Level 2 DEMs. Rem. Sens. Environ. 84: 295-308.
18. Hyyppä J., Hyyppä H., Litkey P., Yu X., Haggrén H., Rönnholm P., Pyysalo U., Pitkänen J., Maltamo M. 2004. Algorithms and methods of airborne laser scanning for forest measurements. P. 82-89 in Proc. of the ISPRS laser-scanners for forest and landscape assessment, Thies M., Koch B., Spiecker H., Weinacker H. (eds.). Albert Ludwigs University, Freiburg, Germany.
19. Hyyppä J., Hyyppä H., Maltamo M., Yu X., Ahokas E., Pyysalo U. 2003. Laser scanning of forest resources-Some of the Finnish Experience. P. 53-59 in Proc. of the ScanLaser scientific workshop on airborne laser scanning of forests, September 3-4, Umeå, Sweden.
20. Hyyppä J., Pyysalo U., Hyyppä H., Samberg A. 2000. Elevation accuracy of laser scanning-derived digital terrain and target models in forest environment. P. 139-147 in Proc. of the EARSel-SIG-workshop on LIDAR, June 16-17, 2000, Dresden/FRG.
21. Johnson E.W. 1958. The effect of photographic scale on precision of individual tree-height measurement. Photogramm. Eng. 24(1): 142-152.
22. Kobler A., Pfeifer N., Ogrinc P., Todorovski L., Oštir K., Džeroski S. 2007. Repetitive interpolation: A robust algorithm for DTM generation from aerial laser scanner data in forested terrain. Rem. Sens. Envir. 109: 9-23.
23. Kovats M. 1997. A large-scale aerial photographic technique for measuring tree heights on long-term forest installations. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 63(6): 741-747.
24. Kraus K., Pfeifer N. 1998. Determination of terrain models in wooded areas with airborne laser scanner data. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 53: 193-203.
25. Lefsky M., Cohen W., Parker G., Harding D. 2002. Lidar remote sensing for ecosystem studies. Bioscience 52: 19-30.
26. Lim K., Treitz P., Wulder M., St-Onge B., Flood M. 2003. LiDAR remote sensing of forest structure. Progr. Phys. Geogr. 27(1): 88-106.
27. Lohmann P., Koch A., Schaeffer M. 2000. Approaches to the filtering of laser scanner data. Int. Arch. Photogram. Rem. Sens. 33-B3/1: 534-541.
28. Maltamo M., Mustonen K., Hyyppä J., Pitkanen J., Yu X. 2004. The accuracy of estimating individual tree variables with airborne laser scanning in a boreal nature reserve. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 1491-1801.
29. McCombs J.W., Roberts S.D., Evans D.L. 2003. Influence of fusing Lidar and multispectral imagery on remotely sensed estimates of stand density and mean tree height in a managed Loblolly Pine plantation. For. Sci. 49(3): 457-466.
30. McGaughey R.J. 2009. FUSION/LDV: Software for LIDAR data analysis and visualization. Available online at forsys.cfr.washington.edu/fusion/fusionlatest.html; last accessed Oct. 27, 2009.
31. Means J., Acker S., Fitt B., Renslow M., Emerson L., Hendrix C. 2000. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne scanning LIDAR. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 66: 1367-1371.
32. Naesset E. 1997. Determination of mean tree height of forest stands using an airborne laser scanner data. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 52: 49-56.
33. Naesset E. 2002. Predicting forest stand characteristics with airborne laser using a practical two-stage procedure and field data. Rem. Sens. Envir. 80: 88-99.
34. Nilsson M., Brandtberg T., Hagner O., Holmgren J., Persson Å., Steinvall O., Sterner H., Söderman U., Olsson H. 2003. Laser scanning of forest resources-The Swedish experience. P. 43-52 in Proc. of the ScanLaser scientific workshop on airborne laser scanning of forests, September 3-4, Umeå, Sweden.
35. Persson A., Holmgren J., Söderman U. 2002. Detecting and measuring individual trees using an airborne laser scanner. Photogramm. Eng. Rem. Sens. 68(9): 925-932.
36. Pillsbury N.H., Kirkley M.L. 1984. Equations for total, wood, and saw-log volume for thirteen California hardwoods. PNW Res. Note PNW-414. Pacific Northwest Res. Stn., Portland, OR. 52 p.
37. Popescu S.C., Wynne R.H., Nelson R.F. 2002. Estimating plot-level tree heights with lidar: local filtering with a canopy height based variable window size. Comput. Electron. Agric. 37: 71-95.
38. Popescu S., Zhao K. 2007 A voxel-based LIDAR method for estimating crown base height for deciduous and pine trees. Rem. Sens. Environ. 112(3): 767-781.
39. Reutebuch S.E., McGaughey R.J., Andersen H.E., Carson W.W. 2003. Accuracy of a high-resolution lidar terrain model under a conifer forest canopy. Can. J. Rem. Sens. 29(5) 527-535.
40. Sithole G. 2001. Filtering of laser altimetry data using a slope adaptive filter. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 34-3/W 4: 203-210.
41. Sithole G., Vosselman G. 2004. Experimental comparison of filter algorithms for bare-earth extraction from airborne laser scanning points clouds. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 59: 85-101.
42. Sohn G., Dowman I. 2002. Terrain surface reconstruction by the use of tetrahedron model with the MDL criterion. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Rem. Sens. 34-3A: 336-344.
43. Vosselman G. 2000. Slope based filtering of laser altimetry data. Int. Arch. Photogram. Rem. Sens. 33-B3/ 2: 935-942.
44. Weinacker H., Koch B., Weinacker R. 2004. TreeVis-A software system for simultaneous 3D real time visualization of DTM, laser raw data, multispectral data, simple tree and building models. P. 95 in Proc. of the ISPRS working group VIII/2 on "Laser-scanners for forest and landscape assessment,"Oct. 3-, Freiburg, Germany, Vol. 90.
45. Wulder M. 2003. The current status of laser scanning of forests in Canada and Australia. P. 21-33 in Proc. of the ScanLaser Scientific Workshop on Airborne Laser Scanning of Forests, Sept. 3-4, Umeå, Sweden.
46. Yu X., Hyyppä J., Kaartinen H., Maltamo M. 2004. Automatic detection of harvested trees and determination of forest growth using airborne laser scanning. Rem. Sens. Envir. 90: 451-462.
47. Zhang K., Chen S., Whitman D., Shyu M., Yan J., Zhang C. 2003. A progressive morphological filter for removing nonground measurements from airborne LIDAR data. IEEE Trans. Geosc. Rem. Sen. 41(4): 872-882.