Does cholecystectomy status influence the common bile duct diameter? A matched-pair analysis

Digestive Diseases and Sciences

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 1155-1160

  Chawla, Saurabh ^a   Trick, William E ^a,b   Gilkey, Susan ^a   Attar, Bashar M ^a,b  

^a Jr Hospital of Cook County   (United States)

^b RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

Author keywords

Cholecystectomy; Common bile duct; Diameter; Dilatation; Size

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EVALUATION; COMMON BILE DUCT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INCIDENTAL FINDING; MALE; MEDICAL DECISION MAKING; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOGRAPHY; AGED; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; FOLLOW UP; LESIONS AND DEFECTS; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REFERENCE VALUE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ADULT; AGED; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; COMMON BILE DUCT; DILATATION, PATHOLOGIC; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; ORGAN SIZE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REFERENCE VALUES; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 77950357766     PISSN: 01632116     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10620-009-0836-y     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. CF Qvist 1957 The influence of cholecystectomy on the normal common bile duct Acta Chir Scand 113 1 30 34 1:STN:280:DyaG2s%2FptVCruw%3D%3D 13443724
2. C Niederau J Muller A Sonnenberg T Scholten J Erckenbrecht WP Fritsch, et al. 1983 Extrahepatic bile ducts in healthy subjects, in patients with cholelithiasis, and in postcholecystectomy patients: a prospective ultrasonic study J Clin Ultrasound 11 1 23 27 10.1002/jcu.1870110106 10.1002/jcu.1870110106 1:STN:280:DyaL3s7mtFOjtg%3D%3D 6403584 (Pubitemid 13172936)
3. AW Majeed B Ross AG Johnson 1999 The preoperatively normal bile duct does not dilate after cholecystectomy: results of a 5-year study Gut 45 5 741 743 1:STN:280:DyaK1MvkslKrtA%3D%3D 10517913
4. Gore RM, Levine MS. Textbook of gastrointestinal radiology. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders; 2007.
5. Berk RN, Ferrucci JT, Leopold GR. Radiology of the gallbladder and bile duct: diagnosis and intervention. Philadelphia: Saunders; 1983.
6. Yamada T, Alpers DH. Textbook of gastroenterology. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2003.
7. Schiff ER, Sorrell MF, Maddrey WC. Schiff's diseases of the liver. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2007.
8. MF Wisniewski P Kieszkowski BM Zagorski WE Trick M Sommers RA Weinstein 2003 Development of a clinical data warehouse for hospital infection control J Am Med Inform Assoc 10 5 454 462 10.1197/jamia.M1299 10.1197/jamia.M1299 12807807 (Pubitemid 37093334)
9. H Zylberberg H Fontaine JM Correas F Carnot C Brechot S Pol 2000 Dilated bile duct in patients receiving narcotic substitution: an early report J Clin Gastroenterol 31 2 159 161 10.1097/00004836-200009000-00015 10.1097/00004836- 200009000-00015 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvktlentw%3D%3D 10993435
10. B Feng Q Song 1995 Does the common bile duct dilate after cholecystectomy? Sonographic evaluation in 234 patients AJR Am J Roentgenol 165 4 859 861 1:STN:280:DyaK2MvgslCmtQ%3D%3D 7676981
11. DR Hunt AJ Scott 1989 Changes in bile duct diameter after cholecystectomy: a 5-year prospective study Gastroenterology 97 6 1485 1488 1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FmtVGrtw%3D%3D 2684721
12. PR Mueller JT Ferrucci Jr JF Simeone J Wittenberg E vanSonnenberg A Polansky, et al. 1981 Postcholecystectomy bile duct dilatation: myth or reality? AJR Am J Roentgenol 136 2 355 358 1:STN:280:DyaL3M7jtVCnug%3D%3D 6781258
13. MF Graham PL Cooperberg MM Cohen HJ Burhenne 1980 The size of the normal common hepatic duct following cholecystectomy: an ultrasonographic study Radiology 135 1 137 139 1:STN:280:DyaL3c7ks1Cquw%3D%3D 7360951
14. GN Bachar M Cohen A Belenky E Atar S Gideon 2003 Effect of aging on the adult extrahepatic bile duct: a sonographic study J Ultrasound Med 22 9 879 882 14510259
15. I Hamilton WS Ruddell CJ Mitchell DJ Lintott AT Axon 1982 Endoscopic retrograde cholangiograms of the normal and post-cholecystectomy biliary tree Br J Surg 69 6 343 345 10.1002/bjs.1800690618 10.1002/bjs.1800690618 1:STN:280:DyaL383gslemtg%3D%3D 7082962 (Pubitemid 12125326)
16. RL Baron RJ Stanley JK Lee RE Koehler GL Melson DM Balfe, et al. 1982 A prospective comparison of the evaluation of biliary obstruction using computed tomography and ultrasonography Radiology 145 1 91 98 1:STN:280: DyaL3s%2FhsFyltQ%3D%3D 7122903
17. PA Pasanen K Partanen P Pikkarainen E Alhava A Pirinen E Janatuinen 1994 A prospective study on the value of ultrasound, computed tomography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the diagnosis of unjaundiced cholestasis In Vivo 8 2 227 230 1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2Fgt1Krtw%3D%3D 7919126
18. S Leschka H Alkadhi S Wildermuth B Marincek 2005 Multi-detector computed tomography of acute abdomen Eur Radiol 15 12 2435 2447 10.1007/s00330-005-2897-4 10.1007/s00330-005-2897-4 16132914 (Pubitemid 43153844)
19. RS Perret GD Sloop JA Borne 2000 Common bile duct measurements in an elderly population J Ultrasound Med 19 11 727 730 1:STN:280: DC%2BD3crhtVyitw%3D%3D 11065260