Comparison of initial cell retention and clearance kinetics after subendocardial or subepicardial injections of endothelial progenitor cells in a canine myocardial infarction model

Journal of Nuclear Medicine

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 413-417

  Mitchell, Andrea J ^a,b   Sabondjian, Eric ^a,b   Sykes, Jane ^b   Deans, Lela ^b   Zhu, Wendy ^b   Lu, Xiangru ^a   Feng, Qingping ^a,b   Prato, Frank S ^a,b   Wisenberg, Gerald ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b LAWSON HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Cell labeling; Myocardial infarction; Single photon emission computed tomography; Stem cell therapy

Indexed keywords

TROPOLONE IN 111; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; INDIUM TRIS(TROPOLONATE); ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND; TROPOLONE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOCARDIUM; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; EPICARDIUM; EXPERIMENTAL DOG; FEMALE; HALF LIFE TIME; HEART INFARCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STEM CELL; ANIMAL; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CYTOLOGY; DISEASE MODEL; DOG; INJECTION; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PERICARDIUM; SCINTISCANNING; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; TIME; TRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; DOGS; ENDOCARDIUM; ENDOTHELIAL CELLS; FEMALE; HALF-LIFE; INJECTIONS; METABOLIC CLEARANCE RATE; MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PERICARDIUM; STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION; STEM CELLS; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TROPOLONE;

EID: 77950357669     PISSN: 01615505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.109.069732     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Orlic D, Kajstura J, Chimenti S, et al. Bone marrow cells regenerate infarcted myocardium. Nature. 2001;410:701-705. (Pubitemid 32290358)
2. Nishida M, Li TS, Hirata K, Yano M, Matsuzaki M, Hamano K. Improvement of cardiac function by bone marrow cell implantation in a rat hypoperfusion heart model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:768-773. (Pubitemid 36298337)
3. Meyer GP, Wollert KC, Lotz J, et al. Intracoronary bone marrow cell transfer after myocardial infarction: eighteen months' follow-up data from the randomized, controlled BOOST (BOne marrOw transfer to enhance ST-elevation infarct regeneration) trial. Circulation. 2006;113:1287-1294. (Pubitemid 43739450)
4. Schächinger V, Assmus B, Britten MB, et al. Transplantation of progenitor cells and regeneration enhancement in acute myocardial infarction: final oneyear results of the TOPCARE-AMI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:1690-1699. (Pubitemid 39369805)
5. Schächinger V, Erbs S, Elsaesser A, et al. Intracoronary bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:1210-1221. (Pubitemid 44427445)
6. Yousef M, Schannwell CM, Koestering M, Zeus T, Brehm M, Strauer BE. The BALANCE study clinical benefit and long-term outcome after intracoronary autologous bone marrow cell transplantation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:2262-2269.
7. Jin Y, Kong HF, Stodilka RZ, et al. Determining the minimum number of detectable cardiac-transplanted in-111-tropolone-labelled bone-marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells by SPECT. Phys Med Biol. 2005;50:4445-4455. (Pubitemid 41361509)
8. 111In-tropolone in infarcted canine myocardium. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:927-935.
9. Wisenberg G, Lekx K, Zabel P, et al. Cell tracking and therapy evaluation of bone marrow monocytes and stromal cells using SPECT and CMR in a canine model of myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:11.
10. Badorff C, Brandes RP, Popp R, et al. Transdifferentiation of blood-derived human adult endothelial progenitor cells into functionally active cardiomyocytes. Circulation. 2003;107:1024-1032. (Pubitemid 36258727)
11. Kawamoto A, Gwon HC, Iwaguro H, et al. Therapeutic potential of ex vivo expanded endothelial progenitor cells for myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2001;103:634-637. (Pubitemid 32144189)
12. Kawamoto A, Tkebuchava T, Yamaguchi JI, et al. Intramyocardial transplantation of autologous endothelial progenitor cells for therapeutic neovascularization of myocardial ischemia. Circulation. 2003;107:461-468. (Pubitemid 36158050)
13. Canadian Council on Animal Care. Guide to the Care and Use of Experimental Animals. Ottawa, Ontario, Canada: Canadian Council on Animal Care, 1993.
14. He H, Shirota T, Yasui H, Matsuda T. Canine endothelial progenitor cell-lined hybrid vascular graft with nonthrombogenic potential. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2003;126:455-464. (Pubitemid 37048512)
15. Holz A, Lautamaeki R, Sasano T, et al. Expanding the versatility of cardiac PET/CT: feasibility of delayed contrast enhancement CT for infarct detection in a porcine model. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:259-265.
16. Chin BB, Nakamoto Y, Bulte JWM, Pittenger MF, Wahl R, Kraitchman DL. In-111 oxine labelled mesenchymal stem cell SPECT after intravenous administration in myocardial infarction. Nucl Med Commun. 2003;24:1149-1154. (Pubitemid 39625401)
17. Hou D, Youssef EAS, Brinton TJ, et al. Radiolabeled cell distribution after intramyocardial, intracoronary, and interstitial retrograde coronary venous delivery: implications for current clinical trials. Circulation. 2005;112:I150-I156.
18. Stein PD, Marzilli M, Sabbah HN, Lee T. Systolic and diastolic pressuregradients within the left-ventricular wall. Am J Physiol. 1980;238:H625-H630. (Pubitemid 10118144)
19. Sabbah HN, Marzilli M, Stein PD. The relative role of subendocardium and subepicardium in left-ventricular mechanics. Am J Physiol. 1981;240:H920-H926. (Pubitemid 11072762)
20. Grossman PM, Han ZG, Palasis M, Barry JJ, Lederman RJ. Incomplete retention after direct myocardial injection. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2002;55:392-397. (Pubitemid 34204886)
21. Dewald O, Ren GF, Duerr GD, et al. Of mice and dogs: species-specific differences in the inflammatory response following myocardial infarction. Am J Pathol. 2004;164:665-677. (Pubitemid 38364680)