Detection of dead regions in the cochlea: Relevance for combined electric and acoustic stimulation

Advances in Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 67, Issue , 2010, Pages 43-50

  Moore, Brian C J ^a   Glasberg, Brian ^a   Schlueter, Anne ^a  

^a University of Cambridge   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; ELECTROSTIMULATION; HEARING LOSS; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REVIEW; SPONTANEOUS OTOACOUSTIC EMISSION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY THRESHOLD; COCHLEA; ELECTRIC STIMULATION; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS, SPONTANEOUS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;

EID: 77950356936     PISSN: 00653071     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1159/000262595     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Moore BCJ: Dead regions in the cochlea: conceptual foundations, diagnosis and clinical applications. Ear Hear 2004;25:98-116.
2. Greenwood DD: Critical bandwidth and the frequency coordinates of the basilar membrane. J Acoust Soc Am 1961;33:1344-1356.
3. Greenwood DD: A cochlear frequencyposition function for several species - 29 years later. J Acoust Soc Am 1990;87:2592-2605.
4. Moore BCJ: Parallels between frequency selectivity measured psychophysically and in cochlear mechanics. Scand Audiol Suppl 1986;25:139-152.
5. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR: A model of loudness perception applied to cochlear hearing loss. Aud Neurosci 1997;3:289-311.
6. Moore BCJ: Dead regions in the cochlea: diagnosis, perceptual consequences, and implications for the fitting of hearing aids. Trends Amplif 2001;5:1-34.
7. Tyler RS, Parkinson AJ, Wilson BS, Witt S, Preece JP, Noble W: Patients utilizing a hearing aid and a cochlear implant: speech perception and localization. Ear Hear 2002;23:98-105.
8. Ching TY, Incerti P, Hill M: Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears. Ear Hear 2004;25:9-21.
9. Turner CW, Gantz BJ, Vidal C, Behrens A, Henry BA: Speech recognition in noise for cochlear implant listeners: benefits of residual acoustic hearing. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;115:1729-1735.
10. Vinay, Moore BCJ: Prevalence of dead regions in subjects with sensorineural hearing loss. Ear Hear 2007;28:231-241.
11. Aazh H, Moore BCJ: Dead regions in the cochlea at 4 kHz in elderly adults: relation to absolute threshold, steepness of audiogram, and pure tone average. J Am Acad Audiol 2007;18:96-107.
12. Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR, Stone MA: New version of the TEN test with calibrations in dB HL. Ear Hear 2004;25:478-487.
13. Moore BCJ, Huss M, Vickers DA, Glasberg BR, Alcántara JI: A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 2000;34:205-224.
14. Huss M, Moore BCJ: Tone decay for hearing-impaired listeners with and without dead regions in the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am 2003;114:3283-3294.
15. Preminger JE, Carpenter R, Ziegler CH: A clinical perspective on cochlear dead regions: intelligibility of speech and subjective hearing aid benefit. J Am Acad Audiol 2005;16:600-613.
16. Florentine M, Houtsma AJM: Tuning curves and pitch matches in a listener with a unilateral, low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983;73:961-965.
17. Moore BCJ, Laurence RF, Wright D: Improvements in speech intelligibility in quiet and in noise produced by twochannel compression hearing aids. Br J Audiol 1985;19:175-187.
18. Moore BCJ, Vickers DA, Glasberg BR, Baer T: Comparison of real and simulated hearing impairment in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear hearing loss. Br J Audiol 1997;31:227-245.
19. Murray N, Byrne D: Performance of hearing-impaired and normal hearing listeners with various high-frequency cut-offs in hearing aids. Aust J Audiol 1986;8:21-28.
20. Huss M, Moore BCJ: Dead regions and pitch perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2005;117:3841-3852.
21. Huss M, Moore BCJ: Dead regions and noisiness of pure tones. Int J Audiol 2005;44:599-611.
22. Moore BCJ: An Introduction to the Psychology of Hearing, ed 5. San Diego, Academic Press, 2003.
23. Chistovich LA: Frequency characteristics of masking effect. Biofizika 1957;2:743-755.
24. Small AM: Pure-tone masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1959;31:1619-1625.
25. Vogten LLM: Pure-tone masking: a new result from a new method; in Zwicker E, Terhardt E (eds): Facts and Models in Hearing. Berlin, Springer, 1974, pp 142- 155.
26. Moore BCJ: Psychophysical tuning curves measured in simultaneous and forward masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1978;63:524-532.
27. Kluk K, Moore BCJ: Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for normally hearing subjects. Hear Res 2004;194:118-134.
28. Thornton AR, Abbas PJ: Low-frequency hearing loss: perception of filtered speech, psychophysical tuning curves, and masking. J Acoust Soc Am 1980;67:638-643.
29. Turner CW, Burns EM, Nelson DA: Pure tone pitch perception and low-frequency hearing loss. J Acoust Soc Am 1983;73:966-975.
30. Moore BCJ, Vickers DA, Plack CJ, Oxenham AJ: Inter-relationship between different psychoacoustic measures assumed to be related to the cochlear active mechanism. J Acoust Soc Am 1999;106:2761-2778.
31. Moore BCJ, Alcántara JI: The use of psychophysical tuning curves to explore dead regions in the cochlea. Ear Hear 2001;22:268-278.
32. Summers V, Molis MR, Musch H, Walden BE, Surr RK, Cord MT: Identifying dead regions in the cochlea: psychophysical tuning curves and tone detection in threshold-equalizing noise. Ear Hear 2003;24:133-142.
33. Kluk K, Moore BCJ: Factors affecting psychophysical tuning curves for hearing- impaired subjects. Hear Res 2005;200:115-131.
34. Kluk K, Moore BCJ: Detecting dead regions using psychophysical tuning curves: a comparison of simultaneous and forward masking. Int J Audiol 2006;45:463-476.
35. Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ: Derivation of auditory filter shapes from notchednoise data. Hear Res 1990;47:103-138.
36. Hoekstra A, Ritsma RJ: Perceptive hearing loss and frequency selectivity; in Evans EF, Wilson JP (eds): Psychophysics and Physiology of Hearing. London, Academic Press, 1977, pp 263-271.
37. Zwicker E: On the psychophysical equivalent of tuning curves; in Zwicker E, Terhardt E (eds): Facts and Models in Hearing. Berlin, Springer, 1974, pp 132- 140.
38. Sek A, Alcántara JI, Moore BCJ, Kluk K, Wicher A: Development of a fast method for determining psychophysical tuning curves. Int J Audiol 2005;44:408-420.