Edge detection and texture classification by cuttlefish

Journal of Vision

Volumn 9, Issue 13, 2009, Pages 1-10

  Zylinski, Sarah ^a,b   Osorio, Daniel ^a   Shohet, Adam J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c QINETIQ   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Animal vision; Camoufiage; Cephalopod; Edge detection; Texture

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CEPHALOPOD; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEPTH PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ANIMALS; DECAPODIFORMES; DEPTH PERCEPTION; FORM PERCEPTION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION;

EID: 77950349008     PISSN: None     EISSN: 15347362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/9.13.1     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Barbosa, A., Litman, L., & Hanlon, R.T. (2008). Changeable cuttlefish camouflage is influenced by the horizontal and vertical aspects of the visual background. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 194, 405-413.
2. Barbosa, A., Mäthger, L. M., Buresch, K.C., Kelly, J., Chubb, C., Chiao, C.-C., et al. (2008). Cuttlefish camouflage: The effects of substrate contrast and size in evoking Uniform, Mottle or Disruptive body patterns. Vision Research, 48, 1242-1253.
3. Barbosa, A., Mäthger, L. M., Chubb, C., Chiao, C.-C., Florio, C., & Hanlon, R.T. (2007). Disruptive coloration in cuttlefish: A visual perception mechanism that regulates ontogenetic adjustment of skin patterning. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 1139-1147.
4. Campbell, F.W., & Robson, J.G. (1968). Application of Fourier analysis to the visibility of gratings. The Journal of Physiology, 197, 551-566.
5. Chiao, C.-C., Chubb, C., & Hanlon, R.T. (2007). Interactive effects of size, contrast, intensity and configuration of background objects in evoking Disruptive camouflage in cuttlefish. Vision Research, 47, 2223-2235.
6. Chiao, C.-C., & Hanlon, R.T. (2001a). Cuttlefish camouflage: Visual perception of size, contrast and number of white squares on artificial checkerboard substrata initiates Disruptive coloration. Journal of Experimental Biology, 204, 2119-2125.
7. Chiao, C.-C., & Hanlon, R.T. (2001b). Cuttlefish cue visually on area-not shape or aspect ratio-of light objects in the substrate to produce Disruptive body patterns for camouflage. Biology Bulletin, 201, 269-270.
8. Chiao, C.-C., Kelman, E.J., & Hanlon, R.T. (2005). Disruptive body patterning of cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis) requires visual information regarding edges and contrast of objects in natural substrate backgrounds. Biology Bulletin, 208, 7-11.
9. Douglas, R.H., & Hawryshyn, C.W. (1990). Behavioural studies of fish vision: An analysis of visual capabilities. In R.H. Douglas & M.B.A. Djamgoz (Eds.), The visual system of fish. London: Chapman & Hall.
10. Georgeson, M.A., May, K.A., Freeman, T.C.A., & Hesse, G.S. (2007). From filters to features: Scale-space analysis of edge and blur coding in human vision. Journal of Vision, 7(13):7, 1-21, http://journalofvision.org/7/13/7/, doi:10.1167/7.13.7.
11. Hanlon, R. (2007). Cephalopod dynamic camouflage. Current Biology, 17, 1-5.
12. Hanlon, R.T., Chiao, C.-C., Mäthger, L. M., Barbosa, A., Buresch, K.C., & Chubb, C. (2009). Cephalopod dynamic camouflage: Bridging the continuum between background matching and Disruptive coloration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 364, 429-437.
13. Hanlon, R.T., & Messenger, J.B. (1988). Adaptive coloration in young cuttlefish (Sepia officinalis L) - The morphology and development of body patterns and their relation to behaviour. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 320, 437-487.
14. Hanlon, R.T., & Messenger, J.B. (1996). Cephalopod behaviour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Hanlon, R.T., Naud, M.-J., Forsythe, J.W., Hall, K., Watson, A.C., & Mckechnie, J. (2007). Adaptive night camouflage by cuttlefish. American Naturalist, 169, 543-551.
16. Julesz, B. (1981). Textons, the elements of texture perception, and their interactions. Nature, 290, 91-97.
17. Kelman, E.J., Baddeley, R.J., Shohet, A.J., & Osorio, D. (2007). Perception of visual texture and the expression of Disruptive camouflage by the cuttlefish Sepia officinalis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 274, 1369-1375.
18. Kelman, E.J., Osorio, D., & Baddeley, R. (2008). Review on sensory neuroethology of Cuttlefish camouflage and visual object recognition. Journal of Experimental Biology, 211, 1757-1763.
19. Kelman, E.J., Tiptus, P., & Osorio, D. (2006). Juvenile plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) produce camouflage by flexibly combining two separate patterns. Journal of Experimental Biology, 209, 3288-3292.
20. Kovesi, P. (2002). Edges are not just steps. The 5th Asian Conference on Computer Vision, Melbourne, Australia.
21. Kovesi, P.D. (1999). Image features from phase congruency. Journal of Computer Vision Research, 1, 2-26.
22. Kovesi, P.D. (2000). Phase congruency: A low-level image invariant. Psychological Research, 64, 136-148.
23. Langridge, K., Broom, M., & Osorio, D. (2007). Selective signalling by cuttlefish to predators. Current Biology, 17, R1044-R1045.
24. Lythgoe, J.N. (1979). The ecology of vision. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
25. Marr, D., & Hildreth, E. (1980). Theory of edge detection. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 207, 187-217.
26. Mäthger, L. M., Chiao, C.C., Barbosa, A., Buresch, K.C., Kaye, S., & Hanlon, R.T. (2007). Disruptive coloration elicited on controlled natural substrates in cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Journal of Experimental Biology, 210, 2657-2666.
27. Morrone, M.C., & Burr, D.C. (1988). Feature detection in human vision: A phase-dependent energy model. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 235, 221-245.
28. Packard, A. (1972). Cephalopods and fish: The limits of convergence. Biology Review, 47, 241-307.
29. Perona, P., & Malik, J. (1990). Detecting and localizing edges composed of steps, peaks and roofs. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Computer Vision.
30. Portilla, J., & Simoncelli, E.P. (2000). A parametric texture model based on joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients. International Journal of Computer Vision, 40, 49-71.
31. Ramachandran, V.S., Tyler, C.W., Gregory, R.L., Rogers-Ramachandran, D., Duensing, S., Pillsbury, C., et al. (1996). Rapid adaptive camouflage in tropical flounders. Nature, 379, 815-818.
32. Shohet, A., Baddeley, R., Anderson, J.C., & Osorio, D. (2007). Cuttlefish camouflage: A quantitative study of patterning. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 92, 335-345.
33. Stevens, M., & Cuthill, I.C. (2006). Disruptive coloration, crypsis and edge detection in early visual processing. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 273, 2141-2147.
34. Stuart-Fox, D., Whiting, M.J., & Moussalli, A. (2006). Camouflage and colour change: Antipredator responses to bird and snake predators across multiple populations in a dwarf chameleon. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 88, 437-446.
35. Sweeney, A.M., Haddock, S.H.D., & Johnsen, S. (2007). Comparative visual acuity of coleoid cephalopods. Integrative and Comparative Biology, 47, 808-814.
36. Torre, V., & Poggio, T.A. (1986). On edge detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 8, 147-163.
37. Zeil, J., & Hemmi, J.M. (2006). The visual ecology of fiddler crabs. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, Neuroethology, Sensory, Neural, and Behavioral Physiology, 192, 1-25.
38. Zylinski, S., Osorio, D., & Shohet, A. (2009). Perception of edges and visual texture in the camouflage of the common cuttlefish, Sepia officinalis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences, 364, 439-448.