Reliability of steel frames designed in accordance with the National Building Code of Canada seismic provisions and its implication in codified design

Engineering Structures

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1284-1291

  Hong, H P ^a   Hong, P ^b   Wang, W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b NANCHANG HANGKONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Code calibration; Ductility factor; Earthquake load; Normalized yield strength; Reliability; Seismic Design

Indexed keywords

CODE CALIBRATION; DUCTILITY FACTOR; EARTHQUAKE LOAD; NORMALIZED YIELD STRENGTH; YIELD STRENGTH;

BUILDING CODES; CALIBRATION; DESIGN; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKES; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL FRAMES; TANKERS (SHIPS); TARGETS; YIELD STRESS;

SEISMIC DESIGN;

BUILDING CODE; CALIBRATION; COLLAPSE; DUCTILITY; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; SEISMIC RETROFIT; STANDARD (REGULATION); STEEL STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

CANADA;

EID: 77950340863     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. NBCC National building code of Canada 1995. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes. National Research Council of Canada. Ottawa; 1995.
2. NBCC. National building code of Canada 2005. Canadian Commission on Building and Fire Codes, National Research Council of Canada. Ottawa; 2005.
3. Adams J., Atkinson G. Development of seismic hazard maps for the proposed 2005 edition of the national building code of canada. Canad J Civil Eng 2003, 30:255-271.
4. Cornell CA. Reliability-based earthquake-resistant design; The future. In: Proc. eleventh world conf. on earthquake design. 1996.
5. Han W., Wen Y.K. Method of reliability-based seismic design. I: Equivalent nonlinear system. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1997, 123(3):256-263.
6. Seneviratna GDPK, Krawinkler H. Evaluation of inelastic MDOF effects for seismic design. Rep. No. 120, Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Dept. of Civil Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif. 1997.
7. Seneviratna GDPK, Krawinkler H. Modifications of seismic demands for MDOF systems. In: Proc. 11th world conf. on earthquake engineering. 1996. Paper no. 2129.
8. Bazzurro P., Cornell C.A. Seismic hazard analysis of non-linear structures-1: Methodology. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1994, 120(11):3320-3365.
9. Bazzurro P., Cornell C.A., Shome N., Carballo J.E. Three proposals for characterizing MDOF nonlinear seismic response. J Struct Eng, ASCE 1998, 124(11):1281-1290.
10. Shome N, Cornell CA. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of nonlinear structures. Report No. RMS-35, Stanford University; 1999.
11. Cornell CA, Vamvatsikos D, Jalayer F, Luco N. Seismic reliability of steel frames. In: Proc. of 9th IFIP WG 7.5 working conference on reliability and optimization of structural systems sept. 2000.
12. Cornell C.A., Jalayer F., Hamburger R.O., Foutch D.A. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2002, 128(4):526-533.
13. Chopra A.K., Goel R.K. Evaluation of NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF systems. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2000, 126(4):482-490.
14. Esteva L., Diaz-Lopez O., Garcia-Perez J. Reliability function for earthquake resistant function. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 2001, 73:239-262.
15. Wen Y.K. Reliability and performance-based design. Struct Safety 2001, 23:407-428.
16. Hong H.P., Jiang J. Ratio between inelastic and elastic responses with uncertain structural properties. Canad J Civil Eng 2004, 31(4):703-711.
17. Goda K., Hong H.P. Optimal seismic design for limited planning time horizon with detailed seismicity information. Struct Safety 2006, 28(3):247-260.
18. FEMA-356. Pre-standard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings, FEMA 356-357. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). Reston (VA); 2000.
19. Vamvatsikos D., Cornell C.A. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2002, 31(3):491-514.
20. Vamvatsikos D., Cornell C.A. Direct estimation of seismic demand and capacity of multidegree-of-freedom systems through incremental dynamic analysis of single degree of freedom approximation. J Struct Eng, ASCE 2005, 131(4):589-599.
21. Jiang J. Nonlinear seismic responses of single-degree-of-freedom systems with uncertain structural properties. M.E.Sc. thesis. London (Ontario): University of Western Ontario. 2002.
22. Wang W. Probabilistic assessment of steel frames designed according to NBCC seismic provisions. Ph.D. thesis. London (Ontario): University of Western Ontario. 2006.
23. Hong H.P., Hong P. Probabilistic analysis of bilinear SDOF systems subjected to earthquake loading. Proc of the int conf on advances in eng struct, mech & construction 2006, 711-723. Springer, Waterloo (Canada). M. Pandey, W. Xie, L. Xu (Eds.).
24. Goda K., Hong H.P., Lee C.S. Probabilistic characteristics of seismic ductility demand of sdof systems with Bouc-Wen hysteretic behavior. J Earthq Eng 2009, 13:600-622.
25. Wen Y.K., Chen C.H. On fast integration for time variant structural reliability. Probab Eng Mech 1987, 2(2):156-162.
26. Hong H.P. Evaluation of the probability of failure with uncertain distribution parameters. Civil Eng Syst 1996, 13:157-168.
27. Adams J, Halchuk S. Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: Values for over 650 Canadian localities for the 2005 National Building Code of Canada. Geological Survey of Canada, Open File 4459, 2003.
28. Hong H.P., Goda K., Davenport A.G. Seismic hazard analysis: A comparative study. Canad J Civil Eng 2006, 33:1156-1171.
29. Diaz-Lopez O, Esteva L. Calibrating simplified models for computation of seismic reliability of multistory frames. In: Esteva L, Ruiz S editors. Proceeding of ICASP6 Mexico, (D.F., Mexico): Institute of Engineering. 1991, p. 328-37.
30. Nakashima M. Uncertainties associated with ductility performance of steel building structures. Seismic design methodology for the next generation of codes 1997, Balkema, Rotterdam. P. Fajfar, H. Krawinkler (Eds.).
31. Wen Y.K. Reliability and performance based design. Struct Safety 2001, 23:407-428.
32. ASCE. Seismic design criteria for structures, systems and components in nuclear facilities ASCE/SEI Standard 43-05, Reston, Va. 2005.
33. Kennedy RC, Short SA. Basis for seismic provision of DOE-STD-1020, Report UCRL-CR-111478 and BNL-52418, US Department of Energy Washington, DC, 1994.