Obtaining relative induced ring currents quantitatively from NICS

Journal of Organic Chemistry

Volumn 75, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 2281-2288

  Stanger, Amnon ^a  

^a TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONJUGATED SYSTEMS; NUCLEUS-INDEPENDENT CHEMICAL SHIFTS; QUANTITATIVE MEASURES; RELATIVE INTENSITY; RING CURRENTS;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; MODEL; PROTON NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

EID: 77950315167     PISSN: 00223263     EISSN: 15206904     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jo1000753     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. (a) Chen, Z.; Wannere, C. S.; Corminboeuf, C.; Puchta, R.; Schleyer, P. v. R. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3842-3888.
2. (b) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Manoharan, M.; Jiao, H.; Stahl, F, Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 3643-3646.
3. (c) Kleinpeter, E.; Klod, S.; Koch, A. THEOCHEM 2007, 811, 45-60. and references cited therein
4. (d) Fallah-Bagher-Shaidaei, H.; Wannere, C. S.; Corminboeuf, C.; Puchta, R.; Schleyer, P. v. R. Org. Lett. 2006, 8, 863-866. For the original NICS paper see:
5. (e) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Maerker, C.; Dransfeld, A.; Jiao, H.; Hommes, N. J. R. v. E. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1996, 118, 6317-6318.
6. (a) Schleyer. P. v. R.; Jiao, H. Pure, Appl. Chem. 1996, 68, 209-218.
7. (b) Lloyd, D. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1996, 36, 442-447.
8. (c) Stanger, A. Chem. Commun. 2009, 1939-1947.
9. Stanger, A. J. Org. Chem, 2006, 71, 883-893.
10. See, for example: (a) Stanger, A. Chem.-Eur. J. 2006, 12, 2745-2751.
11. (b) Koehler, F.; Herges, R.; Stanger, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2007, 111, 5116-5118.
12. (c) Stanger, A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2008, 112, 12849-12854.
13. A similar method was introduced by Cossio and his collaborators. See: (a) Moreo, I.; Lecea, B.; Cossio, F. P. J. Org. Chem, 1997, 62, 7033-7036.
14. (b) Moreo, I.; Cassio, F. P. J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 1868-1874.
15. It has been shown the σ electrons have both dia- and paratropic contributions, however, not necessarily in equal amounts. See: Gomes, J. A. N. F.; Maillon, R. B. Chem. Rev. 2001, 101, 1349-1383.
16. (a) Steinmann, S. N.; Jana, D. F.; Wu, J. I-C.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Mo, Y.; Corminboeuf, C. Amew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 9828-9833.
17. (b) Heine, T.; Islas, R.; Merino, G. J. Cornnut. Chem. 2007, 28, 302-309.
18. (c) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Jiao, H. J.; van Eikema Hommes, N. J. R.; Malkin, V. G.; Malkina, O. L. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1977, 119, 12669-12670.
19. (d) Schleyer, P. v. R.; Manoharan, M.; Wang, Z. X.; Kiran, B.; Jiao, H.; Puchta, J.; van Eikema Hommes, N. J. R. Org. Lett. 2001, 3, 2465-2468.
20. Bohmann, J. A.; Weinhold, F.; Farrar, T. C. Natural Chemical Shielding. J. Chem. Phys. 1997, 107, 1173-1184.
21. Glendening, E. D.; Badenhoop, J. K.; Reed, A. E.; Carpenter, J. E.; Bohmann, J. A.; Morales, C. M.; Weinhold, F. http://www.cdhem.wisc.edu/~nbo5.
22. Wolinski, K.; Hilton, J. F.; Pulay, P. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1990, 112, 8251-8260. and references cited therein.
23. Never-the-less, this method has shown successes (see ref Ia and Id) and agreement with current density analyses. For example, see the study of cyclopropane; for current density see: Pelloni, S.; Lazzeretti, P.; Zanasi, R. J. Phys. Chem. A. 2007. 111, 8163-8169.
24. For CMO-NICS see: Wu. W.; Ma. B.; Wu, J. I-C.; Schleyer, P. v. R.; Mo, Y. Chem. - Eur. J. 2009, 15, 9730-9736.
25. Gaussian 03 rev. B.05, C.02 and D.02. Frisch, M. J.; Trucks, G. W.; Schlegel, H. B.; Scuseria, G. E.; Robb, M. A.; Cheeseman, J. R.; Montgomery, J. A., Jr.; Vreven, T.; Kudin, K. N.; Burant, J. C.; Millam, J. M.; Iyengar, S. S.; Tomasi, J.; Barone, V.; Mennucci, B.; Cossi, M.; Scalmani, G.; Rega, N.; Petersson, G. A.; Nakatsuji, H.; Hada, M.; Ehara, M.; Toyota, K.; Fukuda, R.; Hasegawa, J.; Ishida, M.; Nakajima, T.; Honda, Y.; Kitao, O.; Nakai, H.; Klene, M.; Li, X.; Knox, J. E.; Hratchian, H. P.; Cross, J. B.; Bakken, V.; Adamo, C.; Jaramillo, J.; Gomperts, R.; Stratmann, R. E.; Yazyev, O.; Austin, A. J.; Cammi, R.; Pomelli, C.; Ochterski, J. W.; Ayala, P. Y.; Morokuma, K.; Voth, G. A.; Salvador, P.; Dannenberg, J. J.; Zakrzewski, V. G.; Dapprich, S.; Daniels, A. D.; Strain, M. C.; Farkas, O.; Malick, D. K.; Rabuck, A. D.; Raghavachari, K.; Foresman, J. B.; Ortiz, J. V.; Cui, Q.; Baboul, A. G.; Clifford, S.; Cioslowski, J.; Stefanov, B. B.; Liu, G.; Liashenko, A.; Piskorz, P.; Komaromi, I.; Martin, R. L.; Fox, D. J.; Keith, T.; Al-Laham, M. A.; Peng, C. Y.; Nanayakkara, A.; Challacombe, M.; Gill, P. M. W.; Johnson, B.; Chen, W.; Wong, M. W.; Gonzalez, C.; Pople. J. A. Gaussian. Inc. Wallingford, CT, 2004.
26. See, for example: (a) Herndon, W. C. J. Am. Chem. Soc 1973, 95, 2404-2406.
27. (b) Herndon, W. C.; Ellzey, M. L., Jr. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1974, 96, 6631-6642.
28. See, for example: (a) Fowler, P. W.; Steiner, E. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 264, 259-266.
29. (b) Steiner, E.; Fowler, P. W.; Havenith, R. W. A. J. Phys. Chem. A 2002, 106, 7048-7056.
30. (c) Steiner, E.; Fowler, P. W. Int. J. Oupntum Chem. 1996, 60, 609-616.
31. Anusooya, Y.; Chakrabarti, A.; Pati, S. K.; Ramasesha, S. Int. J. Ouantum Chem. 1998, 70, 503-513.
32. Also, these large ring currents are not consistent with common knowledge, for example, NMR chemical shifts and REPE.
33. Pelloni, S.; Ligabue, A.; Lazzeretti, P. Qrg. Lett. 2004, 6, 4451-4454.
34. Soncini, A.; Teale, A. M.; Helgaker, T.; De Proft, F.; Tozer, D. J. J. Chem. Phys. 2008, 129, 074101-1-15.
35. Havenith, R. W. A.; Fowler, P. W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2007, 449, 347-353.
36. Soncini, A.; Fowler, P. W. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 396, 174-181.
37. Fowler, P. W.; Soncini, A. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2004, 383, 507-511.
38. (a) Soncini, A.; Havenith, R. W. A.; Fowler, P. W.; Jenneskens, L. W.; Steiner, E. J. Org. Chem, 2002, 67, 4753-4758.
39. (b) Fowler, P. W.; Havenith, R. W. A.; Jenneskens, L. W.; Soncini, A.; Steiner, E. Chem. Commun. 2001, 2386-2387.
40. Pelloni, S.; Faglioni, F.; Zanasi, R.; Lazzeretti, P. Phvs. Rev. A 2006, 74, 012506-1-8.
41. Jusélius, J.; Sundholm, D. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 1999, 1, 3429-3435.
42. Feixas, F.; Matito, E.; Poater, J.; Solá, M. J. Comput. Chem. 2008, 29, 1543-1554.
43. One of the ways to rationalize this is the existence of quinoid canonic structures which do not have ring currents.