Modeling surface water-groundwater interaction with MODFLOW: Some considerations

Ground Water

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 174-180

  Brunner, Philip ^a   Simmons, Craig T ^b   Cook, Peter G ^c   Therrien, René ^d  

^a FLINDERS UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b NATIONAL CENTRE FOR GROUNDWATER RESEARCH AND TRAINING   (Australia)

^c CSIRO   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CELL WIDTH; DISCRETIZATIONS; FLOW REGIMES; FULL COUPLING; GROUND-WATER MOUND; INFILTRATION FLUXES; MODFLOW; NEGATIVE PRESSURES; SIMPLIFYING ASSUMPTIONS; SURFACE WATER-GROUNDWATER INTERACTION; UNSATURATED FLOWS; WATER TABLES;

AQUIFERS; GROUNDWATER RESOURCES; RIVERS; SURFACE CHEMISTRY;

INFILTRATION;

AQUIFER; FLOW MODELING; GROUNDWATER-SURFACE WATER INTERACTION; INFILTRATION; WATER TABLE;

ARTICLE; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METHODOLOGY; THEORETICAL MODEL; WATER FLOW;

ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WATER MOVEMENTS;

EID: 77950283282     PISSN: 0017467X     EISSN: 17456584     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00644.x     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Barlow PM, Harbaugh A. USGS directions in MODFLOW development. Ground Water 2006, 44:771-774. no. 6:
2. Brunner P, Cook PG, Simmons CT. Hydrogeologic controls on disconnection between surface water and groundwater. Water Resources Research 2009a, 45:W01422. doi 10.1029/2008WR006953
3. Brunner P, Simmons CT, Cook PG. Spatial and temporal aspects of the transition from connection to disconnection between rivers, lakes and groundwater Journal of Hydrology 2009b, 376:159-169. no. 1-2:, doi 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.07.023
4. Carsel RF, Parrish RS. Developing joint probability-distributions of soil-water retention characteristics. Water Resources Research 1988, 24:755-769.
5. Doherty J. Improved calculations for dewatered cells in MODFLOW. Ground Water 2001, 39:863-869.
6. Fox GA, Durnford DS. Unsaturated hyporheic zone flow in stream/aquifer conjunctive systems. Advances in Water Resources 2003, 26:989-1000.
7. Furman A. Modeling coupled surface-subsurface flow processes: A review. Vadose Zone Journal 2008, 7:741-756. no. 2:
8. Harbaugh A, Banta E, Hill M, McDonald M. MODFLOW-2000, the USGS Modular Groundwater-Model: Users guide to modularization concepts and the groundwater flow process. 2000, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-92. Reston, Virginia: USGS
9. McDonald MG, Harbaugh AW. A modular, three-dimensional finite-difference ground-water flow model. 1988, Reston, Virginia: USGS
10. Niswonger RG, Prudic DE. Documentation of the streamflow-routing (SFR2) package to include unsaturated flow beneath streams-A modification to SFR1. 2006, U.S. Geological Survey Techniques and Methods, Book 6, Chap. A13. Carson City, Nevada: USGS
11. Osman YZ, Bruen MP. Modelling stream-aquifer seepage in an alluvial aquifer: An improved losing-stream package for MODFLOW. Journal of Hydrology 2002, 264:69-86. no. 1-4:
12. Prudic DE. Documentation of a computer program to simulate stream-aquifer relations using a modular, finite-difference, ground-water flow model. 1989, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 88-729. Carson City. Nevada: USGS
13. Prudic DE, Konikow LF, Banta ER. A new stream flow routing (SFR1) package to simulate stream-aquifer interaction with MODFLOW-2000. 2004, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2004-1042. Carson City, Nevada: USGS
14. Schmitz GH, Edenhofer J. Exact closed-form solution of the two-dimensional Laplace equation for steady groundwater flow with nonlinearized free-surface boundary condition. Water Resources Research 2000, 36:1975-1980.
15. Therrien R, McLaren RG, Sudicky EA, Panday SM. Hydrogeosphere 2006, Waterloo, Canada, Groundwater Simulations Group, University of Waterloo
16. van Genuchten MT. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Am. Journal 1980, 44:892-898.