Factor structure of the Chinese version of the university of Rhode Island change assessment in Taiwanese adolescents who abuse MDMA or methamphetamine

American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 114-117

  Yen, Cheng Fang ^a,e   Huang, Ya Shune ^b   Chang, Yu Ping ^c   Cheng, Chung Ping ^d  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^b TAOYUAN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

^c UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^d NATIONAL CHUNG CHENG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^e KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Adolescent; MDMA; Methamphetamine; Transtheoretical model of change

Indexed keywords

3,4 METHYLENEDIOXYMETHAMPHETAMINE; METHAMPHETAMINE;

ABSTINENCE; ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; CHINESE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMAN; JUVENILE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; TAIWAN; UNITED STATES; UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND CHANGE ASSESSMENT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; ASIAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; METHAMPHETAMINE; MOTIVATION; N-METHYL-3,4-METHYLENEDIOXYAMPHETAMINE; PSYCHIATRIC STATUS RATING SCALES; QUESTIONNAIRES; SUBSTANCE-RELATED DISORDERS; TAIWAN;

EID: 77950252212     PISSN: 00952990     EISSN: 10979891     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00952991003713776     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chen WJ, Fu TC, Ting TT, Huang WL, Tang GM, Hsiao CK, Chen CY. Use of ecstasy and other psychoactive substances among school-attending adolescents in Taiwan: National surveys 2004-2006. BMC Public Health 2009: 9-27.
2. Gowing LR, Henry-Edwards SM, Irvine RJ, Ali RL. The health effects of ecstasy: A literature review. Drug Alcohol Rev 2002; 21:53-63.
3. Weaver MF, Schnoll SH. Stimulants: Amphetamine and cocaine. In Addictions: A Comprehensive Guidebook. McCrady BS, Epstein EE, eds. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999; 105-120.
4. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Transtheoretical therapy: Toward a more integrative model of change. Psychother, Theory, Res Pr 1982; 19: 276-288.
5. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC, Norcross JC. In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Am Psychol 1992; 47:1102-1114.
6. DiClemente CC, Schlundt D, Gemmell L. Readiness and stages of change in addiction treatment. Am J Addict 2004; 13:103-119.
7. Prochaska JO, DiClemente CC. Toward a comprehensive model of change. In Treating Addictive Behaviors: Processes of Change.Miller WR, Heather N, eds. New York: Plenum Press, 1986; 3-27.
8. DiClemente CC, Hughes SO. Stages of change profiles in alcoholism treatment. J Subst Abuse 1990; 2:217-235.
9. McConnaughy EN, Prochaska JO, Velicer WF. Stages of change in psychotherapy: Measurement and sample profiles. Psychother, Theory, Res Pr 1983; 20:368-375.
10. DiClemente CC, Carbonari J, Zweben A, Morrel T, Lee RE. Motivational hypothesis causal chain analysis. In Project MATCH: A Priori Matching Hypotheses, Results, and Mediating Mechanisms. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Project MATCH Monograph Series. Longabaugh R,Wirtz PW, eds. Rockville, MD: National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, 2001; 8:218-234.
11. Project MATCH Research Group. Matching alcoholism treatment to client heterogeneity: Project MATCH posttreatment drinking outcomes. J Stud Alcohol 1997; 58:7-29.
12. Brislin RW. Back-translation for cross-culture research. J Cross Cult Psychol 1970; 1:185-216.
13. Huang YS, Tang TC, Lin CH, Yen CF. Effects of motivational enhancement therapy on readiness to change MDMA and methamphetamine use behaviors in Taiwanese adolescents. Substance Use and Misuse, in press.
14. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8.8 for Windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, 2006.
15. Bandalos DL, Finney SJ. Item parceling issues in structural equation modeling. In Advanced Structural Equation Modeling: New Developments and Techniques. Marcoulides GA, Schumacker RE, eds. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, 2001; 269-296.
16. Bagozzi RP, Edwards JR. A general approach for representing constructs in organizational research. Organ Res Methods 1998; 1:45-87.
17. Hu L, Bentler PM. Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychol Methods 1998; 3:424-453.
18. Browne MW, Cudeck R. Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Testing structural equation models. Bollen KA, Long JS, eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1993; 136-162.
19. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D. LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International, 1993.