Differential selection on sprint speed and ad libitum feeding behaviour in active vs. sit-and-wait foraging spiders

Functional Ecology

Volumn 24, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 392-399

  Pruitt, Jonathan N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE   (United States)

Author keywords

Locomotion; Optimal foraging; Performance character; Sprint speed; Superfluous killing

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE RADIATION; ANIMAL; FEEDING BEHAVIOR; FORAGING BEHAVIOR; LOCOMOTION; NATURAL SELECTION; OPTIMUM FORAGING THEORY; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SPIDER;

AGELENIDAE; AGELENOPSIS EMERTONI; ANIMALIA; ARANEAE; BARRONOPSIS TEXANA; HOGNA HELLUO; LYCOSIDAE; SCHIZOCOSA OCREATA;

EID: 77950210557     PISSN: 02698463     EISSN: 13652435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01655.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Akaike H. Factor-analysis and Aic. Psychometrika 1987, 52:317-332.
2. Ayoub NA, Riechert SE, Small RL. The speciation history of the north American funnel-web spider Agelenopsis (Araneae: Agelenidae): phylogenetic inferences at the population-species interface. Molecular Phylogeneics and Evolution 2005, 36:42-57.
3. Boake CRB. Repeatability: its role in evolutionary studies of mating behavior. Evolutionary Ecology 1989, 3:173-182.
4. Calsbeek R, Irschick DJ. The quick and the dead: correlational selection on morphology, performance, and habitat use in island lizards. Evolution 2007, 61:2493-2503.
5. Domenici R, Blake R. The kinematics and performance of fish fast-start swimming. Journal of Experimental Biology 1997, 200:1165-1178.
6. Downes S, Shine R. Why does tail lose increase a lizard's later vulnerability to snake predators? Ecology 2001, 83:1293-1303.
7. Drummond H, Gordon ER. Luring in the neonate alligator snapping turtle (Macrochelys temminckii): description and experimental analysis. Journal of Comparative Ethology 1979, 50:136-152.
8. Falconer DS, McKay TF. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics 1996, Prentice Hall Longman, New York
9. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. American Naturalist 1985, 125:1-15.
10. Foelix RF. Biology of Spiders 1996, Oxford University Press, New York, NY
11. Ford NB, Shuttlesworth GA. Effects of variation in food-intake on locomotory performance of juvenile garter snakes. Copeia 1986, 1983:999-1001.
12. Garland T, Arnold SJ. Effects of full stomach on locomotory performance of juvenile garter snakes (Thamnophis elegans). Copeia 1983, 1986:1092-1096.
13. Garland T, Losos JB. Ecological morphology of locomotor performance in squamate reptiles. Ecological Morphology: Integrative Organismal Biology 1994, 240-302. Wainwright PC, Reilly SM. eds, pp, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois
14. Gudger EW. The anglerfishes, Lophius piscatorius et americanus, use the lure in fishing. American Naturalist 1945, 79:542-548.
15. Herrel A, Meyers JJ, Vanhooydonck B. Relations between microhabitat use and limb shape in phrynosomatid lizards. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 2002, 77:149-163.
16. Huey RB, Pianka ER. Ecological consequences of foraging mode. Ecology 1981, 62:991-999.
17. Huey RB, Bennett AF, John-Alder HB, Nagy KA. Locomotor capacity and foraging behaviour of Kalahari lacertid lizards. Animal Behaviour 1984, 32:41-50.
18. Husak JF. Does speed help you survive? A test with collared lizards of different ages. Functional Ecology 2006, 20:174-179.
19. Husak JF, Fox SF. Field use of maximal sprint speed by collared lizards (Crotaphytus collaris): compensation and sexual selection. Evolution 2006, 60:1888-1895.
20. Husak JF, Fox SF, Van Den Bussche RA. Faster males lizards are better defenders not sneakers. Animal Behaviour 2008, 75:1725-1730.
21. Irschick DJ, Garland T. Integrating function and ecology in studies of adaptation: investigations of locomotor capacity as a model system. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematic 2001, 32:367-396.
22. Irschick DJ, Meyers JJ, Husak JF, Le Galliard JF. How does selection operate on whole-organism functional performance capacities? A review and synthesis. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2008, 10:177-196.
23. Janzen FJ, Stern HS. Logistic regression for empirical studies of multi variate selection. Evolution 1998, 52:1564-1571.
24. Jayne BC, Bennett AF. Selection on locomotor performance capacity in a natural population of garter snakes. Evolution 1990, 44:1204-1229.
25. Kingsolver JG, Hoekstra HE, Hoekstra JM, Berrigan D, Vignieri SN, Hill CE, Hoang A, Gilbert P, Beerli P. The strength of phenotypic selection in natural populations. American Naturalist 2001, 157:245-261.
26. Lande R, Arnold SJ. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 1983, 37:1210-1226.
27. Losos JB. The evolution of form and function: morphology and locomotor performance in West Indian Anolis lizards. Evolution 1990, 44:1189-1203.
28. MacArthur RH, Pianka ER. On optimal use of a patchy environment. American Naturalist 1966, 100:603-609.
29. Martin J. Effects of recent feeding on locomotor performance of juvenile Psammodromus algirus lizards. Functional Ecology 1996, 10:390-395.
30. Maupin JL, Riechert SE. Superfluous killing in spiders: a consequence of adaptation to food-limited environments? Behavioral Ecology 2001, 12:569-576.
31. McLaughlin RL. Search modes of birds and lizards: evidence for alternative movement patterns. American Naturalist 1989, 133:654-670.
32. Miles DB. The race goes to the swift: fitness consequences of variation in sprint performance in juvenile lizards. Evolutionary Ecology and Research 2004, 6:63-75.
33. Miles DB, Losos JB, Irschick DJ. Morphology, performance, and foraging mode. Lizard Ecology 2007, 49-93. Reilly SM, McBrayer LB, Miles DB. eds, pp, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
34. Perry G, Pianka ER. Animal foraging: past, present, and future. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 1997, 12:360-364.
35. Perry G, Lampl I, Lerner A, Rothenstein D, Shani E, Sivan N, Werner YL. Foraging mode in lacertid lizards: variation and correlates. Amphibia-Reptilia 1990, 11:373-384.
36. Perry G, Levering K, Girard I, Garland T. Locomotor performance and social dominance in male Anolis cristatellus. Animal Behaviour 2004, 67:37-47.
37. Pianka ER. Convexity, desert lizards, and spatial heterogeneity. Ecology 1966, 47:1055-1059.
38. Pruitt JN, Husak JF. Context-dependent running speed in funnel-web spiders from divergent populations. Functional Ecology 2010, 24. 10.1111/j.1365-2435.2009.01623.x, DOI
39. Riechert SE. Prey abundance vs diet breadth in a spider test system. Evolutionary Ecology 1991, 5:327-338.
40. Riechert SE, Harp J. Nutritional Ecology of Spiders. Arthropod Nutrition 1987, 318-328. Slansky F, Rodriguez JG. eds, pp, Academic Press, New York
41. Riechert SE, Maupin JL. Spider effects on prey: tests for superfluous killing in five web-builders. Proceedings of 17th European Colloquium of Arachnology, Edinburgh: Bull. Brit. Arachn. Soc 1998, 203-210. eds, P. A. Seldon, pp
42. Riechert SE, Tracy CR. Thermal balance and prey availability-bases for a model relating web-site characteristics to spider reproductive success. Ecology 1975, 56:265-284.
43. Shine R. Locomotor speeds of gravid lizards: placing 'costs of reproduction' within an ecological context. Functional Ecology 2003, 17:526-533.
44. Shine R, Sun L. Arboreal ambush site selection by pit-vipers (Gloydius shedaoensis). Animal Behaviour 2002, 63:565-576.
45. Spagna JC, Gillespie RG. More data, fewer shifts: molecular insights into the evolution of the spinning apparatus in non-orb-weaving spiders. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2008, 46:347-368.
46. Swain DP. Selective predation for vertebral phenotype in Gasterosteus aculeatus: reversal in the direction of selection at different larval sizes. Evolution 1992, 46:998-1013.
47. Ubick D, Paquin P, Cushing PE, Roth V. Spiders of North America: An Identification Manual 2005, http://www.americanarachnology.org, eds, American Arachnological Society,
48. Van Damme RB, Vanhooydonck B, Aerts P, De Vree F. Evolution of lizard locomotion: context and constraint. Vertebrate Biomechanics and Evolution 2003, 267-283. Bels VL, Gasc JP, Casinos A, eds, pp, BIOS Scientific Publishers, Oxford
49. Vanhooydonck B, Van Damme R, Aerts P. Speed and stamina trade-offs in Lacertid lizards. Evolution 2001, 55:1040-1048.
50. Vitt LJ, Congdon JD. Body shape, reproductive effort, and relative clutch mass in lizards: resolution of a paradox. American Naturalist 1978, 112:595-608.
51. Walker JA, Ghalambor CK, Griset OL, McKenney D, Reznick DN. Do faster starts increase the probability of evading predators? Functional Ecology 2005, 19:808-815.
52. Watkins TB. Predator-mediated selection on burst swimming performance in tadpoles of the pacific tree frog, Psuedacris regilla. Physiological Zoology 1996, 69:154-167.
53. Zaaf A, Van Damme V. Limb proportions in climbing and ground-dwelling geckos (Lepidosauria, Gekkonidae): a phylogenetically informed analysis. Zoomorphology 2001, 121:45-53.