Cerebral gliomas: Diffusional kurtosis imaging analysis of microstructural differences

Radiology

Volumn 254, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 876-881

  Raab, Peter ^a,b   Hattingen, Elke ^a   Franz, Kea ^a   Zanella, Friedhelm E ^a   Lanfermann, Heinrich ^a,b  

^a GOETHE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^b HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; ANISOTROPY; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTOMA; CANCER GRADING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; DIFFUSIONAL KURTOSIS IMAGING ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GLIOBLASTOMA; GLIOMA; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; INFORMED CONSENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; WHITE MATTER;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANISOTROPY; ARTIFACTS; BRAIN NEOPLASMS; DIFFUSION MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; FEMALE; GLIOMA; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 77950122189     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.09090819     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Sadeghi N, D'Haene N, Decaestecker C, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient and cerebral blood volume in brain gliomas:relation to tumor cell density and tumor microvessel density based on stereotactic biopsies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:476-482.
2. Goebell E, Paustenbach S, Vaeterlein O, et al. Low-grade and anaplastic gliomas: differences in architecture evaluated with diffusion-tensor MR imaging. Radiology 2006;239:217-222.
3. Lu S, Ahn D, Johnson G, Law M, Zagzag D, Grossman RI. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of intracranial neoplasia and associated peritumoral edema:introduction of the tumor infiltration index. Radiology 2004;232:221-228.
4. Beppu T, Inoue T, Shibata Y, et al. Measurement of fractional anisotropy using diffusion tensor MRI in supratentorial astrocytic tumors. J Neurooncol 2003;63:109-116.
5. Sinha S, Bastin ME, Whittle IR, Wardlaw JM. Diffusion tensor MR imaging of highgrade cerebral gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:520-527.
6. Castillo M, Smith JK, Kwock L, Wilber K. Apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of high-grade cerebral gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:60-64.
7. Tropine A, Vucurevic G, Delani P, et al. Contribution of diffusion tensor imaging to delineation of gliomas and glioblastomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004;20:905-912.
8. Tozer DJ, Jager HR, Danchaivijitr N, et al. Apparent diffusion coefficient histograms may predict low-grade glioma subtype. NMR Biomed 2007;20:49-57.
9. Jensen JH, Helpern JA. Quantifying nongaussian water diffusion by means of pulsed-field-gradient MRI [abstr]. In:Proceedings of the Eleventh Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif:International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2003;2154.
10. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. Diffusional kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-gaussian water diffusion by means of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1432-1440.
11. Lu H, Jensen JH, Ramani A, Helpern JA. Three-dimensional characterization of non gaussian water diffusion in humans using diffusion kurtosis imaging. NMR Biomed 2006;19:236-247.
12. Falangola MF, Jensen JH, Babb JS, et al. Age-related non-Gaussian diffusion patterns in the prefrontal brain. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:1345-1350.
13. Hui ES, Cheung MM, Qi L, Wu EX. Towards better MR characterization of neural tissues using directional diffusion kurtosis analysis. Neuroimage 2008;42:122-134.
14. Lazar M, Jensen JH, Xuan L, Helpern JA. Estimation of the orientation distribution function from diffusional kurtosis imaging. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:774-781.
15. Kleihues P, Cavenee W. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the nervous system. Lyon, France: IARC, 2000.
16. Reese TG, Heid O, Weisskoff RM, Wedeen VJ. Reduction of eddy-current-induced distortion in diffusion MRI using a twice-refocused spin echo. Magn Reson Med 2003;49:177-182.
17. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics Int 2004;11:36-42.
18. Beaulieu C. The basis of anisotropic water diffusion in the nervous system:a technical review. NMR Biomed 2002;15:435-455.
19. Basser PJ, Pierpaoli C. Microstructural and physiological features of tissues elucidated by quantitative-diffusion-tensor MRI. J Magn Reson B 1996;111:209-219.
20. Schneider JF, Viola A, Confort-Gouny S, et al. Infratentorial pediatric brain tumors: the value of new imaging modalities. J Neuroradiol 2007;34:49-58.
21. Lu H, Jensen JH, Hu C, et al. Alterations in cerebral microstructural integrity in normal aging and in Alzheimer's disease:a multi-contrast diffusion MRI study [abstr]. In:Proceedings of the Fourteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006;723.
22. Chenevert TL, Sundgren PC, Ross BD. Diffusion imaging:insight to cell status and cytoarchitecture. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2006;16:619-632, viii-ix.
23. Yablonskiy DA, Bretthorst GL, Ackerman JJ. Statistical model for diffusion attenuated MR signal. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:664-669.
24. Cheung MM, Hui ES, Chan KC, Helpern JA, Qi L, Wu EX. Does diffusion kurtosis imaging lead to better neural tissue characterization? A rodent brain maturation study. Neuroimage 2009;45:386-392.
25. Ge Y, Lu H, Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Reaume J, Grossman RI. Thalamic involvement following mild brain injury: in vivo occult pathology demonstrated by diffusion kurtosis imaging [abstr]. In: Proceedings of the Fourteenth Meeting of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Berkeley, Calif: International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2006;729.
26. Cha S. Update on brain tumor imaging: from anatomy to physiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:475-487.
27. Catalaa I, Henry R, Dillon WP, et al. Perfusion, diffusion and spectroscopy values in newly diagnosed cerebral gliomas. NMR Biomed 2006;19:463-475.
28. Fan GG, Deng QL, Wu ZH, Guo QY. Usefulness of diffusion/perfusion- weighted MRI in patients with non-enhancing supratentorial brain gliomas:a valuable tool to predict tumour grading? Br J Radiol 2006;79:652-658.
29. Kim HS, Kim SY. A prospective study on the added value of pulsed arterial spinlabeling and apparent diffusion coefficients in the grading of gliomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1693-1699.
30. Kitis O, Altay H, Calli C, Yunten N, Akalin T, Yurtseven T. Minimum apparent diffusion coefficients in the evaluation of brain tumors. Eur J Radiol 2005;55:393-400.
31. Lee EJ, Lee SK, Agid R, Bae JM, Keller A, Terbrugge K. Preoperative grading of presumptive low-grade astrocytomas on MR imaging:diagnostic value of minimum apparent diffusion coefficient. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1872-1877.
32. Zonari P, Baraldi P, Crisi G. Multimodal MRI in the characterization of glial neoplasms: the combined role of single-voxel MR spectroscopy, diffusion imaging and echo-planar perfusion imaging. Neuroradiology 2007;49:795-803.
33. Lee HY, Na DG, Song IC, et al. Diffusiontensor imaging for glioma grading at 3-T magnetic resonance imaging:analysis of fractional anisotropy and mean diffusivity. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2008;32:298-303.
34. Inoue T, Ogasawara K, Beppu T, Ogawa A, Kabasawa H. Diffusion tensor imaging for preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in gliomas. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2005;107:174-180.