Realized gains from block-plot coastal douglas-fir trials in the northern oregon cascades

Silvae Genetica

Volumn 59, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 29-39

  Ye, T Z ^a   Jayawickrama, K J S ^a   Clair, J B S T ^b  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Competition; Douglas fir; Realized genetic gain

Indexed keywords

COMPETITION; FORESTRY; GENETIC ENGINEERING;

AVERAGE CORRELATION COEFFICIENTS; COASTAL DOUGLAS-FIR; COMPETITIVE ENVIRONMENT; DOUGLAS FIR; GENETIC GAIN; INTERACTION EFFECT; MIXED-MODEL ANALYSIS; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII;

POPULATION STATISTICS;

PSEUDOTSUGA; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII; PSEUDOTSUGA MENZIESII VAR. MENZIESII;

EID: 77950121685     PISSN: 00375349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/sg-2010-0004     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. ADAMS, J. P., S. B. LAND JR., K L. BELLI and T. G. MATNEY (2008): Comparison of 17-year realized plot volume gains with selection for early trait for loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.). For. Ecol. Manag. 255:1781-1788.
2. ADAMS, W. T., G. JOHNSON, D. L. COPES, R. G. QUAM, J. C. HEAMAN and J. WEBER (1990): Is research keeping up with the needs of the Douglas-fir tree improvement programs? West. J. Appl. For. 5:135-137.
3. BANCROFT, T. A. (1968): Topics in Intermediate Statistical Methods. Iowa State University Press, Ames, IA.
4. BARBATO, G. F. (1991): Genetic architecture of growthcurve parameters in chickens. Theor. Appl. Genet. 83: 24-32.
5. BOZIVICH, H., T. A. BANCROFT and H. O. HARTLEY (1956): Power of analysis of variance test procedures for certain incompletely specified models, I. Ann. Math. Statist. 27: 1017-1043.
6. CAMPBELL, R. K., R. M. ECHOLS and R. W. STONECYPHER (1986): Genetic variances and interaction in 9-year-old Douglas-fir grown at narrow spacings. Silvae Genet. 35: 24-32.
7. th North American Forest Biology Workshop, University of Florida, Gainsville, Florida.
8. CANNELL, M. G. R. (1982): "Crop" and "Isolation" ideotypes: evidence for progeny differences in nurserygrown Picea sitchensis. Silvae Genet. 31: 60-66.
9. CARSON, S. D., O. GARCIA and J. D. HAYES (1999): Realized gain and prediction of yield with genetically improved Pinus radiata in New Zealand. For. Sci. 45:186-200.
10. CHEW, V. (1958): Experimental Designs in Industry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
11. CLUTTER, J. L., J. C. FORTSON, L. V. PDSNAAR, G. H. BRISTER and R. L. BAILEY (1983): Timber Management: A Quantitative Approach. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
12. DONALD, C. M. (1968): The breeding of crop ideotypes. Euphytica 17: 385-403.
13. DONALD, C. M. and J. HAMBLIN (1976): The biological yield and harvest index of cereals as agronomic and plant breeding criteria. Adv. Agron. 28: 361-405.
14. th So. For. Tree Improv. Conf., Charleston, SC.
15. FOSTER, G. S. (1992): Estimating yield: beyond breeding values. In: Handbook of quantitative forest genetics. (Ed. L. FINNS and S. T. B. FRIEDMAN, J. V.) pp. 229-269. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
16. FRANKLIN, E. C. (1979): Model relating levels of genetic variance to stand development for four North American conifers. Silvae Genet. 28: 207-212.
17. GILMOUR, A. R., B. J. GOGEL, B. R. CULLIS and R. THOMPSON (2006): ASReml User Guide Release 2.0. VSN International Ltd., Hemel Hempstead, UK.
18. GWAZE, D. P., F. E. BRIDGWATER and C. G. WILLIAMS (2002): Genetic analysis of growth curves for a woody perennial species, Pinus taeda L. Theor. Appl. Genet. 105: 526-531.
19. HAMILTON JR., D. A. and G. E. REHFELDT (1994): Using individual tree growth projection models to estimate stand-level gains attributable to genetically improved stock. For. Ecol. Manag. 68:189-207.
20. HART, J. D. (1986): Intergenotypic competition among several families of loblolly pine. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Forestry, Mississippi State University, 60 pp.
21. HARTER, H. L. (1961): On the analysis of split-plot experiments. Biometrics 17: 144-149.
22. HOWE, G. T., K. JAYAWICKRAMA, M. CHERRY, G. R. JOHNSON and N. C. WHEELER (2006): Breeding Douglas-fir, Volume 27. In: Plant Breed. Rev. (Ed. J. Janick.) pp. 245-353. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
23. JAYAWICKRAMA, K. J. S., A. J. SMITH and M. S. CRAWFORD (2009): Establishment of coastal Douglas-fir orchards. Tree Planters Notes 53: (in press).
24. LAMBETH, C. (2000): Realized genetic gains for first generation improved loblolly pine in 45 tests in coastal North Carolina. South. J. Appl. For. 24:140-144.
25. LAMBETH, C. C., J. P. VAN BUIJTENEN, S. D. DUKE and R. B. MCCULLOUGH (1983): Early selection is effective in 20year-old genetic tests of loblolly pine. Silvae Genet. 32: 210-215.
26. LOPEZ-UPTON, J., T. L. WHITE and D. A. HUBER (2000): Species differences in early growth and rust incidence of loblolly and slash pine. For. Ecol. Manag. 132: 211-222.
27. MAGNUSSEN, S. (1987): Early testing of jack pine. I. Phenotypic response to spacing. Can. J. For. Res. 17: 354-459.
28. MAGNUSSEN, S. and A. KREMER (1993): Selection for the optimum tree growth curve. Silvae Genet. 42: 322-335.
29. NAMKOONG, G., R. A. USANIS and R. R. SILEN (1972): Agerelated variation in genetic control of height growth in Douglas-fir. Theor. Appl. Genet. 42:151-159.
30. th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, Athens, GA.
31. SAKAI, K.-I. (1961): Competitive ability in plants: its inheritance and some related problems. Symp. Soc. Exp. Biol. 15: 245-263.
32. SILEN, R. R. and J. G. WHEAT (1979): Progressive tree improvement program in coastal Douglas-fir. J. For. 77: 78-83.
33. ST. CLAIR, J. B. and W. T. ADAMS (1991): Relative family performance and variance structure of open-pollinated Douglas-fir seedlings grown in three competitive environments. Theor. Appl. Genet. 81: 541-550.
34. ST. CLAIR, J. B., N. L. MANDEL and K. J. S. JAYAWICKRAMA (2004): Early realized genetic gains for coastal Douglasfir in the Northern Oregon Cascades. West. J. Appl. For. 19: 195-201.
35. STOEHR, M. and K. BIRD (2003): Coastal Douglas-fir. P.7. In: Forest Genetics Council of B.C. Tree Improvement Program Project Report 2002/2003, B.C. Ministry Forests, Victoria.
36. VERGARA, R., T. L. WHITE, D. A. HUBER, B. D. SHIVER and D. L. ROCKWOOD (2004): Estimated realized gains for first-generation slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) tree improvement in the southeastern United States. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 2587-2600.
37. WHITE, T. W, W. T. ADAMS and D. B. NEALE (2007): Forest Genetics. CAB International, Wallingford, UK.
38. th Southern Forest Tree Improvement Conference, University of Georgia, Athens, GA.
39. WOODS, J. H., T. WANG and S. N. ATTKEN (2001): Effects of inbreeding on coastal Douglas-fir: nursery performance. Silvae Genet. 51:163-170.
40. YE, T. Z. and K. J. S. JAYAWICKRAMA (2008): Efficiency of using spatial analysis in first-generation costal Douglas-fir progeny tests in the US Pacific Northwest. Tree Genet. Genomes. 4: 677-692.
41. ZOBEL, B. and J. TALBERT (1984): Applied Forest Tree Improvement. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York.