Informational privacy and moral values

Ethics and Information Technology

Volumn 3, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 3-12

  Scanlan, Michael ^a  

^a OREGON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Adjudication; Ethical theory; Privacy; Public records

Indexed keywords

DATA PRIVACY; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

ADJUDICATION; ETHICAL THEORIES; INFORMATIONAL PRIVACIES; MORAL THEORY; MOTOR VEHICLE; PUBLIC RECORDS;

SOCIAL SCIENCES;

EID: 77950094059     PISSN: 13881957     EISSN: 15728439     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1011471604734     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. M.W. Baron, P. Pettit, M. Slote. Three Methods of Ethics: A Debate. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford UK, 1997.
2. S. Hampshire. Justice is Strife. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Association, 65: 19-27, 1991.
3. S. Hampshire. Justice is Conflict. Princeton University Press, Princeton NJ, 2000.
4. H. Nissenbaum. Protecting Privacy in an Information Age: The Problem of Privacy in Public. Law and Philosophy, 17: 559-596, 1998.
5. B. Ross. HB 2096; 1997 Oregon General Assembly, Exhibit F, Letter of February 28, 1997 to House Transportation Committee.
6. F.D. Schoeman, editor. Philosophical Dimensions of Privacy: An Anthology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1984.