Mouse experimental myopia has features of primate myopia

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 51, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1297-1303

  Tkatchenko, Tatiana V ^a   Shen, Yimin ^a   Tkatchenko, Andrei V ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; AUTOMATION; C57BL 6 MOUSE; CLINICAL FEATURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE MODEL; DISEASE PREDISPOSITION; EXPERIMENTAL MYOPIA; EYE REFRACTION; IN VIVO STUDY; LIGHT REFRACTION; MOUSE; MYOPIA; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PERINATAL PERIOD; PHOTOPIC VISION; POSTNATAL DEVELOPMENT; PRIMATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CONTACT LENS; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LIGHT; OPHTHALMOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REFRACTOMETRY; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; SPECTACLES; VITREOUS BODY;

ANIMALS; CONTACT LENSES; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; EYEGLASSES; HUMANS; LIGHT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MYOPIA; OPHTHALMOLOGY; REFRACTION, OCULAR; REFRACTOMETRY; SENSORY DEPRIVATION; VITREOUS BODY;

EID: 77949900423     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: 15525783     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.09-4153     Document Type: Article

References (103)

1. Curtin BJ. The Myopias: Basic Science and Clinical Management. Philadelphia: Harper & Row; 1985.
2. Vitale S, Ellwein L, Cotch MF, Ferris FL 3rd, Sperduto R. Prevalence of refractive error in the United States: 1999-2004. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126:1111-1119.
3. Lam CS, Goldschmidt E, Edwards MH. Prevalence of myopia in local and international schools in Hong Kong. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:317-322.
4. Lin LL, Shih YF, Hsiao CK, Chen CJ. Prevalence of myopia in Taiwanese schoolchildren: 1983 to 2000. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2004;33:27-33.
5. Alexander LJ. Primary Care of the Posterior Segment. 2nd ed. Norwalk, CT: Appleton & Lange; 1994.
6. Robb RM. Refractive errors associated with hemangiomas of the eyelids and orbit in infancy. Am J Ophthalmol. 1977;83:52-58.
7. O'Leary DJ, Millodot M. Eyelid closure causes myopia in humans. Experientia. 1979;35:1478-1479.
8. Wiesel TN, Raviola E. Myopia and eye enlargement after neonatal lid fusion in monkeys. Nature. 1977;266:66-68.
9. Troilo D, Nickla DL. The response to visual form deprivation differs with age in marmosets. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1873-1881.
10. Sherman SM, Norton TT, Casagrande VA. Myopia in the lidsutured tree shrew (Tupaia glis). Brain Res. 1977;124:154-157.
11. Wallman J, Turkel J, Trachtman J. Extreme myopia produced by modest change in early visual experience. Science. 1978;201:1249-1251.
12. Prusky GT, Douglas RM. Developmental plasticity of mouse visual acuity. Eur J Neurosci. 2003;17:167-173.
13. Muir DW, Mitchell DE. Visual resolution and experience: acuity deficits in cats following early selective visual deprivation. Science. 1973;180:420-422.
14. Odom JV, Hoyt CS, Marg E. Effect of natural deprivation and unilateral eye patching on visual acuity of infants and children: evoked potential measurements. Arch Ophthalmol. 1981;99:1412-1416.
15. Iny K, Heynen AJ, Sklar E, Bear MF. Bidirectional modifications of visual acuity induced by monocular deprivation in juvenile and adult rats. J Neurosci. 2006;26:7368-7374.
16. Tejedor J, de la Villa P. Refractive changes induced by form deprivation the mouse eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:32-36.
17. Schaeffel F, Burkhardt E, Howland HC, Williams RW. Measurement of refractive state and deprivation myopia in two strains of mice. Optom Vis Sci. 2004;81:99-110.
18. Barathi VA, Boopathi VG, Yap EP, Beuerman RW. Two models of experimental myopia in the mouse. Vision Res. 2008;48:904-916.
19. Chase HB. Studies on an anophthalmic strain of mice, III: results of crosses with other strains. Genetics. 1942;27:339-348.
20. Kalter H. Sporadic congenital malformations of newborn inbred mice. Teratology. 1968;1:193-199.
21. Koch FLP, Gowen JW. Spontaneous ophthalmic mutation in a laboratory mouse. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1939;28:171-176.
22. Luan H, Roberts R, Sniegowski M, Goebel DJ, Berkowitz BA. Retinal thickness and subnormal retinal oxygenation response in experimental diabetic retinopathy. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:320-328.
23. Tkatchenko TV, Shen Y, Tkatchenko AV. Analysis of postnatal eye development in the mouse with high-resolution small animal magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010;51:21-27.
24. Siegwart JT Jr, Norton TT. The susceptible period for deprivationinduced myopia in tree shrew. Vision Res. 1998;38:3505-3515.
25. Wallman J, Adams JI. Developmental aspects of experimental myopia in chicks: susceptibility, recovery and relation to emmetropization. Vision Res. 1987;27:1139-1163.
26. Papastergiou GI, Schmid GF, Laties AM, Pendrak K, Lin T, Stone RA. Induction of axial eye elongation and myopic refractive shift in one-year-old chickens. Vision Res. 1998;38:1883-1888.
27. Waterston RH, Lindblad-Toh K, Birney E, et al. Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature. 2002;420:520-562.
28. Gordon JA, Stryker MP. Experience-dependent plasticity of binocular responses in the primary visual cortex of the mouse. J Neurosci. 1996;16:3274-3286.
29. Huang ZJ, Kirkwood A, Pizzorusso T, et al. BDNF regulates the maturation of inhibition and the critical period of plasticity in mouse visual cortex. Cell. 1999;98:739-755.
30. Tagawa Y, Kanold PO, Majdan M, Shatz CJ. Multiple periods of functional ocular dominance plasticity in mouse visual cortex. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8:380-388.
31. John SW, Anderson MG, Smith RS. Mouse genetics: a tool to help unlock the mechanisms of glaucoma. J Glaucoma. 1999;8:400-412.
32. Anderson MG, Libby RT, Mao M, et al. Genetic context determines susceptibility to intraocular pressure elevation in a mouse pigmentary glaucoma. BMC Biol. 2006;4:20.
33. Senatorov V, Malyukova I, Fariss R, et al. Expression of mutated mouse myocilin induces open-angle glaucoma in transgenic mice. J Neurosci. 2006;26:11903-11914.
34. Keeler C. Retinal degeneration in the mouse is rodless retina. J Hered. 1966;57:47-50.
35. Bowes C, Li T, Danciger M, Baxter LC, Applebury ML, Farber DB. Retinal degeneration in the rd mouse is caused by a defect in the beta subunit of rod cGMP-phosphodiesterase. Nature. 1990;347:677-680.
36. Shearstone JR, Wang YE, Clement A, et al. Application of functional genomic technologies in a mouse model of retinal degeneration. Genomics. 2005;85:309-321.
37. Porciatti V, Pizzorusso T, Maffei L. The visual physiology of the wild type mouse determined with pattern VEPs. Vision Res. 1999;39:3071-3081.
38. Prusky GT, Reidel C, Douglas RM. Environmental enrichment from birth enhances visual acuity but not place learning in mice. Behav Brain Res. 2000;114:11-15.
39. Cook MN, Williams RW, Flaherty L. Anxiety-related behaviors in the elevated zero-maze are affected by genetic factors and retinal degeneration. Behav Neurosci. 2001;115:468-476.
40. Buhot MC, Dubayle D, Malleret G, Javerzat S, Segu L. Exploration, anxiety, and spatial memory in transgenic anophthalmic mice. Behav Neurosci. 2001;115:455-467.
41. Cancedda L, Putignano E, Sale A, Viegi A, Berardi N, Maffei L. Acceleration of visual system development by environmental enrichment. J Neurosci. 2004;24:4840-4848.
42. Schmucker C, Seeliger M, Humphries P, Biel M, Schaeffel F. Grating acuity at different luminances in wild-type mice and in mice lacking rod or cone function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:398-407.
43. Drager UC, Olsen JF. Ganglion cell distribution in the retina of the mouse. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1981;20:285-293.
44. de la Cera EG, Rodriguez G, Llorente L, Schaeffel F, Marcos S. Optical aberrations in the mouse eye. Vision Res. 2006;46:2546-2553.
45. Faulstich BM, Onori KA, du Lac S. Comparison of plasticity and development of mouse optokinetic and vestibulo-ocular reflexes suggests differential gain control mechanisms. Vision Res. 2004;44:3419-3427.
46. Umino Y, Solessio E, Barlow RB. Speed, spatial, and temporal tuning of rod and cone vision in mouse. J Neurosci. 2008;28:189-198.
47. Pettigrew JD, Dreher B, Hopkins CS, McCall MJ, Brown M. Peak density and distribution of ganglion cells in the retinae of microchiropteran bats: implications for visual acuity. Brain Behav Evol. 1988;32:39-56.
48. Prusky GT, Alam NM, Beekman S, Douglas RM. Rapid quantification of adult and developing mouse spatial vision using a virtual optomotor system. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:4611-4616.
49. Prusky GT, West PW, Douglas RM. Behavioral assessment of visual acuity in mice and rats. Vision Res. 2000;40:2201-2209.
50. Abdeljalil J, Hamid M, Abdel-Mouttalib O, et al. The optomotor response: a robust first-line visual screening method for mice. Vision Res. 2005;45:1439-1446.
51. Fantz RL, Ordy JM, Udelf MS. Maturation of pattern vision in infants during the first six months. J Comp Physiol Psychol. 1962;55:907-917.
52. Harter MR, Suitt CD. Visually evoked cortical responses and pattern vision in the infant: a longitudinal study. Psychonomic Sci. 1970;18:235-237.
53. Miranda SB. Visual abilities and pattern preferences of premature infants and full-term neonates. J Exp Child Psychol. 1970;10:189-205.
54. Teller DY, Morse R, Borton R, Regal D. Visual acuity for vertical and diagonal gratings in human infants. Vision Res. 1974;14:1433-1439.
55. Banks MS, Salapatek P. Acuity and contrast sensitivity in 1-, 2-, and 3-month-old human infants. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978;17:361-365.
56. Salapatek P, Bechtold AG, Bushnell EW. Infant visual acuity as a function of viewing distance. Child Dev. 1976;47:860-863.
57. Atkinson J, Braddick O, French J. Contrast sensitivity of the human neonate measured by the visual evoked potential. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1979;18:210-213.
58. Atkinson J, Braddick O, Moar K. Development of contrast sensitivity over the first 3 months of life in the human infant. Vision Res. 1977;17:1037-1044.
59. Remtulla S, Hallett PE. A schematic eye for the mouse, and comparisons with the rat. Vision Res. 1985;25:21-31.
60. Schmucker C, Schaeffel F. Contrast sensitivity of wildtype mice wearing diffusers or spectacle lenses, and the effect of atropine. Vision Res. 2006;46:678-687.
61. Schmucker C, Schaeffel F. A paraxial schematic eye model for the growing C57BL/6 mouse. Vision Res. 2004;44:1857-1867.
62. Schmucker C, Schaeffel F. In vivo biometry in the mouse eye with low coherence interferometry. Vision Res. 2004;44:2445-2456.
63. Balkema GW, Drager UC. Impaired visual thresholds in hypopigmented animals. Vis Neurosci. 1991;6:577-585.
64. Adams B, Fitch T, Chaney S, Gerlai R. Altered performance characteristics in cognitive tasks: comparison of the albino ICR and CD1 mouse strains. Behav Brain Res. 2002;133:351-361.
65. Wong AA, Brown RE. Visual detection, pattern discrimination and visual acuity in 14 strains of mice. Genes Brain Behav. 2006;5:389-403.
66. Puk O, Dalke C, Hrabe de Angelis M, Graw J. Variation of the response to the optokinetic drum among various strains of mice. Front Biosci. 2008;13:6269-6275.
67. Schaeffel F, Howland HC. Axial length changes in myopic mouse eyes (E-Letter). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003.
68. Rosenfield M, Gilmartin B. Myopia and Nearwork. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann; 1998.
69. Kroger RH, Wagner HJ. The eye of the blue acara (Aequidens pulcher, Cichlidae) grows to compensate for defocus due to chromatic aberration. J Comp Physiol [A]. 1996;179:837-842.
70. Shen W, Vijayan M, Sivak JG. Inducing form-deprivation myopia in fish. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1797-1803.
71. Thorn F, Gwiazda J, Held R. Myopia progression is specified by a double exponential growth function. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82:286-297.
72. Bartmann M, Schaeffel F, Hagel G, Zrenner E. Constant light affects retinal dopamine levels and blocks deprivation myopia but not lens-induced refractive errors in chickens. Vis Neurosci. 1994;11:199-208.
73. Stone RA, Lin T, Desai D, Capehart C. Photoperiod, early postnatal eye growth, and visual deprivation. Vision Res. 1995;35:1195-1202.
74. Guo SS, Sivak JG, Callender MG, Herbert KL. Effects of continuous light on experimental refractive errors in chicks. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 1996;16:486-490.
75. Padmanabhan V, Shih J, Wildsoet CF. Constant light rearing disrupts compensation to imposed-but not induced-hyperopia and facilitates compensation to imposed myopia in chicks. Vision Res. 2007;47:1855-1868.
76. Lauber JK, Oishi T. Lid suture myopia in chicks. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1987;28:1851-1858.
77. Oishi T, Lauber JK, Vriend J. Experimental myopia and glaucoma in chicks. Zool Sci. 1987;4:455-464.
78. Oishi T, Lauber JK. Light, experimental avian myopia and the role of the suprarenals. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1986;2:139-146.
79. Osol G, Schwartz B, Foss DC. The effects of photoperiod and lid suture on eye growth in chickens. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1986;27:255-260.
80. Li T, Troilo D, Glasser A, Howland HC. Constant light produces severe corneal flattening and hyperopia in chickens. Vision Res. 1995;35:1203-1209.
81. Liu J, Pendrak K, Capehart C, Sugimoto R, Schmid GF, Stone RA. Emmetropisation under continuous but non-constant light in chicks. Exp Eye Res. 2004;79:719-728.
82. Smith EL 3rd, Hung LF, Kee CS, Qiao-Grider Y, Ramamirtham R. Continuous ambient lighting and lens compensation in infant monkeys. Optom Vis Sci. 2003;80:374-382.
83. Smith EL 3rd, Bradley DV, Fernandes A, Hung LF, Boothe RG. Continuous ambient lighting and eye growth in primates. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2001;42:1146-1152.
84. Underwood H, Steele CT, Zivkovic B. Circadian organization and the role of the pineal in birds. Microsc Res Tech. 2001;53:48-62.
85. Natesan A, Geetha L, Zatz M. Rhythm and soul in the avian pineal. Cell Tissue Res. 2002;309:35-45.
86. Yamazaki S, Goto M, Menaker M. No evidence for extraocular photoreceptors in the circadian system of the Syrian hamster. J Biol Rhythms. 1999;14:197-201.
87. Meijer JH, Thio B, Albus H, Schaap J, Ruijs AC. Functional absence of extraocular photoreception in hamster circadian rhythm entrainment. Brain Res. 1999;831:337-339.
88. Deguchi T. A circadian oscillator in cultured cells of chicken pineal gland. Nature. 1979;282:94-96.
89. Kasal CA, Menaker M, Perez-Polo JR. Circadian clock in culture: N-acetyltransferase activity of chick pineal glands oscillates in vitro. Science. 1979;203:656-658.
90. Takahashi JS, Murakami N, Nikaido SS, Pratt BL, Robertson LM. The avian pineal, a vertebrate model system of the circadian oscillator: cellular regulation of circadian rhythms by light, second messengers, and macromolecular synthesis. Recent Prog Horm Res. 1989;45:279-348; discussion 348-252.
91. Lauber JK, Oishi T. Kainic acid and formoguanamine effects on environmentally-induced eye lesions in chicks. J Ocul Pharmacol. 1990;6:151-156.
92. Lauber JK, Oishi T. Ocular responses of genetically blind chicks to the light environment and to lid suture. Curr Eye Res. 1989;8:757-764.
93. Li T, Howland HC. Modulation of constant light effects on the eye by ciliary ganglionectomy and optic nerve section. Vision Res. 2000;40:2249-2256.
94. Li T, Howland HC. Role of the pineal gland in ocular development of the chick in normal and constant light conditions. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:5132-5136.
95. Lockley SW, Skene DJ, Thapan K, et al. Extraocular light exposure does not suppress plasma melatonin in humans. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998;83:3369-3372.
96. Raviola E, Wiesel TN. Effect of dark-rearing on experimental myopia in monkeys. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1978;17:485-488.
97. Yinon U, Koslowe KC. Hypermetropia in dark reared chicks and the effect of lid suture. Vision Res. 1986;26:999-1005.
98. Yinon U, Koslowe KC. Eyelid closure effects on the refractive error of the eye in dark-and in light-reared kittens. Am J Optom Physiol Opt. 1984;61:271-273.
99. Guyton DL, Greene PR, Scholz RT. Dark-rearing interference with emmetropization in the rhesus monkey. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1989;30:761-764.
100. Oliverio A. Sleep and activity rhythms in mice. Waking Sleeping. 1980;4:155-166.
101. Oliverio A, Malorni W. Wheel running sleep in two strains of mice: plasticity and rigidity in the expression of circadian rhythmicity. Brain Res. 1979;163:121-133.
102. Aschoff J. Freerunning and entrained circadian rhythms. In: Aschoff J, ed. Handbook of Behavioral Neurobiology: Biological Rhythms. New York: Plenum; 1981;81-94.
103. Joly S, Pernet V, Dorfman AL, Chemtob S, Lachapelle P. Lightinduced retinopathy: comparing adult and juvenile rats. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006;47:3202-3212.