Discovering and representing systematic code changes

Proceedings - International Conference on Software Engineering

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 309-319

  Kim, Miryung ^a   Notkin, David ^b  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CHECK-IN; CODE CHANGES; E-COMMERCE; FOCUS GROUPS; LOGIC RULES; PROFESSIONAL SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERS; STRUCTURAL DIFFERENCES; SYSTEMATIC CHANGES; SYSTEMATIC CODE; TEXTUAL DIFFERENCE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE;

EID: 77949887907     PISSN: 02705257     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSE.2009.5070531     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (33)

1. T. Apiwattanapong, A. Orso, and M. J. Harrold. A differencing algorithm for object-oriented programs. In ASE, pages 2-13. IEEE, 2004.
2. E. Balas and M. Padberg. Set Partitioning: A Survey. SIAM Review, 18:710-760, 1976.
3. M. Boshernitsan, S. L. Graham, and M. A. Hearst. Aligning development tools with the way programmers think about code changes. In CHI, pages 567-576. ACM, 2007.
4. O. C. Chesley, X. Ren, and B. G. Ryder. Crisp: A debugging tool for java programs. ICSM, 00:401-410, 2005.
5. J. R. Cordy. The txl source transformation language. Sci. Comput. Program., 61(3):190-210, 2006.
6. B. Dagenais, S. Breu, F. W. Warr, and M. P. Robillard. Inferring structural patterns for concern traceability in evolving software. In ASE, pages 254-263. ACM, 2007.
7. B. Dagenais and M. P. Robillard. Recommending adaptive changes for framework evolution. In ICSE, pages 481-490. ACM, 2008.
8. H. Edmunds. Focus Group Research Handbook. McGraw-Hill, 2000.
9. M. Eichberg, S. Kloppenburg, K. Klose, and M. Mezini. Defining and continuous checking of structural program dependencies. In ICSE, pages 391-400. ACM, 2008.
10. M. Erwig and D. Ren. A rule-based language for programming software updates. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGPLAN workshop on Rule-based programming, pages 67-78, New York, NY, USA, 2002. ACM.
11. M. Fowler. Refactoring: Improving the Design of Existing Code. Addison-Wesley Professional, 2000.
12. H. Gall, K. Hajek, and M. Jazayeri. Detection of logical coupling based on product release history. In ICSM, pages 190-197, 1998.
13. E. Hajiyev, M. Verbaere, and O. de Moor. Codequest: Scalable source code queries with datalog. In ECOOP, volume 4067, pages 2-27, 2006.
14. R. C. Holt. Structural manipulations of software architecture using tarski relational algebra. In WCRE, page 210. IEEE, 1998.
15. D. Janzen and K. D. Volder. Navigating and querying code without getting lost. In AOSD, pages 178-187, 2003.
16. A. Kellens, K. Mens, and P. Tonella. A survey of automated code-level aspect mining techniques. Transactions on Aspect-Oriented Software Development IV, pages 143-162, 2007.
17. G. Kiczales, J. Lamping, A. Menhdhekar, C. Maeda, C. Lopes, J.-M. Loingtier, and J. Irwin. Aspect-oriented programming. In ECOOP, volume 1241, pages 220-242. LNCS, 1997.
18. M. Kim. Analyzing and Inferring the Structure of Code Changes. PhD thesis, University of Washington, 2008.
19. M. Kim and D. Notkin. Program element matching for multi-version program analyses. In MSR, pages 58-64, 2006.
20. M. Kim, D. Notkin, and D. Grossman. Automatic inference of structural changes for matching across program versions. In ICSE, pages 333-343, 2007.
21. M. Kim, V. Sazawal, D. Notkin, and G. C. Murphy. An empirical study of code clone genealogies. In ESEC/SIGSOFT FSE, pages 187-196, 2005.
22. A. J. Ko, R. DeLine, and G. Venolia. Information needs in collocated software development teams. In ICSE, pages 344-353, 2007.
23. S. Kok and P. Domingos. Learning the structure of Markov logic networks. ICML, pages 441-448, 2005.
24. K. Mens, T. Mens, and M. Wermelinger. Maintaining software through intentional source-code views. SEKE, pages 289-296, 2002.
25. Y. Padioleau, J. Lawall, R. R. Hansen, and G. Muller. Documenting and automating collateral evolutions in linux device drivers. In EUROSYS, pages 247-260. ACM, 2008.
26. X. Ren, F. Shah, F. Tip, B. Ryder, and O. Chesley. Chianti: A tool for change impact analysis of Java programs. In OOPSLA, pages 432-448, Vancouver, BC, Canada, October 26-28, 2004.
27. T. Schäfer, J. Jonas, and M. Mezini. Mining framework usage changes from instantiation code. In ICSE, pages 471-480. ACM, 2008.
28. P. Tarr, H. Ossher, W. Harrison, and J. Stanley M. Sutton. N degrees of separation: multi-dimensional separation of concerns. In ICSE, pages 107-119. IEEE, 1999.
29. K. D. Volder. Type-Oriented Logic Meta Programming. PhD thesis, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, 1998.
30. Z. Xing and E. Stroulia. UMLDiff: an algorithm for object-oriented design differencing. In ASE, pages 54-65, 2005.
31. W. Yang. Identifying syntactic differences between two programs. Software - Practice and Experience, 21(7):739-755, 1991.
32. A. T. T. Ying, G. C. Murphy, R. Ng, and M. Chu-Carroll. Predicting source code changes by mining change history. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 30(9):574-586, 2004.
33. T. Zimmermann, P. Weisgerber, S. Diehl, and A. Zeller. Mining version histories to guide software changes. In ICSE, pages 563-572, 2004.