The Safe Functional Motion test is reliable for assessment of functional movements in individuals at risk for osteoporotic fracture

Clinical Rheumatology

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 143-150

  MacIntyre, Norma J ^a   Stavness, Carrie L ^a   Adachi, Jonathan D ^b  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Balance; Osteoporosis; Physical function; Reliability; Validity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BERG BALANCE SCALE; BONE MASS; COMMUNITY BALANCE AND MOBILITY SCALE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; FEMALE; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INTERRATER RELIABILITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFE FUNCTIONAL MOTION TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TIMED UP AND GO TEST; BODY EQUILIBRIUM; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); OSTEOPOROSIS; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; GERIATRIC ASSESSMENT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MOVEMENT; OSTEOPOROSIS; POSTURAL BALANCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 77949882291     PISSN: 07703198     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10067-009-1297-6     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. C Cooper LJ Melton 3rd 1992 Epidemiology of osteoporosis Trends Endocrinol Metab 3 224 229 10.1016/1043-2760(92)90032-V 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1c3kslGrsg%3D%3D 18407104
2. B Lentle J Brown A Khan, et al. 2007 Recognizing and reporting vertebral fractures: reducing the risk of future osteoporotic fractures Can Assoc Radiol J 58 27 36 17408160
3. FJ Bonner Jr M Sinaki M Grabois, et al. 2003 Health professional's guide to rehabilitation of the patient with osteoporosis Osteoporos Int 14 S1 S22 10.1007/s00198-002-1308-9 12759719
4. AM Briggs JH van Dieen TV Wrigley, et al. 2007 Thoracic kyphosis affects spinal loads and trunk muscle force Phys Ther 87 595 607 17472956
5. AB Schultz GB Andersson K Haderspeck, et al. 1982 Analysis and measurement of lumbar trunk loads in tasks involving bends and twists J Biomech 15 669 675 10.1016/0021-9290(82)90021-5 1:STN:280:DyaL3s%2Fot12msw%3D%3D 7174699 (Pubitemid 13219970)
6. SJ Edmondston KP Singer RE Day, et al. 1997 Ex vivo estimation of thoracolumbar vertebral body compressive strength: the relative contributions of bone densitometry and vertebral morphometry Osteoporos Int 7 142 148 10.1007/BF01623690 1:STN:280:DyaK2szgvFahug%3D%3D 9166395
7. ME Cress DM Buchner KA Questad, et al. 1996 Continuous-scale physical functional performance in healthy older adults: a validation study Arch Phys Med Rehabil 77 1243 1250 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90187-2 1:STN:280: DyaK2s7jtVGnsQ%3D%3D 8976306 (Pubitemid 26424836)
8. ME Cress M Meyer 2003 Maximal voluntary and functional performance levels needed for independence in adults aged 65 to 97 years Phys Ther 83 37 48 12495411
9. DB Reuben AL Siu 1990 An objective measure of physical function of elderly outpatients J Am Geriatr Soc 38 1105 1112 1:STN:280: DyaK3M%2Fjs1Khtg%3D%3D 2229864
10. K Delbaere N Van den Noortgate J Bourgois, et al. 2006 The Physical Performance Test as a predictor of frequent fallers: a prospective community-based cohort study Clin Rehabil 20 83 90 10.1191/0269215506cr885oa 16502754 (Pubitemid 43246336)
11. Recknor C, Grant S. IONmed Systems Bone Safety Evaluation www.ionmed.us/bse. Accessed June 29, 2009
12. C Recknor S Grant J Catanzarite, et al. 2005 Bone safety evaluation and functional risk for fracture Osteoporos Int 16 S44 S45 10.1007/s00198-004-1700-8 (Pubitemid 46232120)
13. C Recknor S Grant NJ MacIntyre 2009 A novel performance-based measure of functional risk for osteoporotic fracture has excellent reliability and good convergent construct validity Osteoporos Int 20 S226 S227
14. A Shumway-Cook S Brauer M Woollacott 2000 Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test Phys Ther 80 896 903 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvmtVCjtQ%3D%3D 10960937
15. K Berg S WoodDauphinee JI Williams D Gayton 1989 Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument Physiother Can 41 304 311 10.3138/ptc.41.6.304
16. S Whitney D Wrisley J Furman 2003 Concurrent validity of the Berg Balance Scale and the Dynamic Gait Index in people with vestibular dysfunction Physiother Res Int 8 178 186 10.1002/pri.288 14730722
17. TM Steffen TA Hacker L Mollinger 2002 Age- and gender-related test performance in community-dwelling elderly people: Six-Minute Walk Test, Berg Balance Scale, Timed Up & Go Test, and gait speeds Phys Ther 82 128 137 11856064
18. JA Howe EL Inness A Venturini, et al. 2006 The community balance and mobility scale: a balance measure for individuals with traumatic brain injury Clin Rehabil 20 885 895 1:STN:280:DC%2BD28rnvVChtg%3D%3D 17008340
19. R Rocque D Bartlett J Brown SJ Garland 2005 Influence of age and gender of healthy adults on scoring patterns on the Community Balance and Mobility Scale Physiother Can 57 285 292 10.3138/ptc.57.4.285
20. T LiuAmbrose KM Khan JJ Eng, et al. 2004 Resistance and agility training reduce fall risk in women aged 75 to 85 with low bone mass: a 6-month randomized, controlled trial J Am Geriatr Soc 52 657 665 10.1111/j.1532-5415. 2004.52200.x (Pubitemid 38596481)
21. T LiuAmbrose KM Khan MG Donaldson, et al. 2006 Falls-related self-efficacy is independently associated with balance and mobility in older women with low bone mass J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61A 832 838
22. A Shumway-Cook M Baldwin NL Polissar W Gruber 1997 Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults Phys Ther 77 812 819 1:STN:280:DyaK2svgtFSisA%3D%3D 9256869
23. PE Strout JL Fleiss 1979 Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability Psychol Bull 86 420 428 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420
24. PW Stratford 2004 Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement for reliability studies Physiother Can 56 27 30 10.2310/6640.2004.15377
25. JM Bland DG Altman 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307 310 1:STN:280:DyaL287hslWqsQ%3D%3D 2868172
26. PW Stratford GF Spadoni 2003 Sample size estimation for the comparison of competing measures' reliability coefficients Physiother Can 55 225 229 10.2310/6640.2003.9504
27. ME Cress JK Petrella TL Moore ML Schenkman 2005 Continuous-scale physical functional performance test: validity, reliability, and sensitivity of data for the short version Phys Ther 85 323 335 15794703
28. MB King JO Judge R Whipple L Wolfson 2000 Reliability and responsiveness of two physical performance measures examined in the context of a functional training intervention Phys Ther 80 8 16 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FptFSitw%3D%3D 10623956
29. MM Madureira L Takayama AL Gallinaro, et al. 2007 Balance training program is highly effective in improving functional status and reducing the risk of falls in elderly women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial Osteoporos Int 18 419 425 10.1007/s00198-006-0252-5 1:STN:280: DC%2BD2s7jtVCkuw%3D%3D 17089080 (Pubitemid 46354915)