The impact of improving Outcomes Guidance on the management and outcomes of patients with carcinoma of the penis

Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England

Volumn 92, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 44-45

  Bayles, Andrew C ^a   Sethia, Krishna K ^a  

^a NORFOLK AND NORWICH UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Improving outcomes guidance; Penis cancer; Penis preservation; Survival

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CARCINOMA; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; LYMPHADENECTOMY; MALE; METASTASIS; MORTALITY; PENIS; PENIS TUMOR; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; CARCINOMA; HUMANS; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; LYMPHATIC METASTASIS; MALE; PENILE NEOPLASMS; PENIS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77949878610     PISSN: 00358843     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1308/003588410X12518836439047     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Improving Outcomes in Urologicai Cancer. London: NICE, 2002
2. McDougal WS. Carcinoma of the penis: improved survival by early regional lymphadenectomy based on the histological grade and depth of invasion of the primary lesion. J Urol 1995; 154: 1364-6.
3. Kroon BK, Horenblas S, Lont AP, Tanis PJ, Gallee MP, Nieweg OE. Patients with penile carcinoma benefit from immediate resection of clinically occult lymph node metastases. J Urol 2005; 173: 816-9.