The audiovisual tau effect in infancy

PLoS ONE

Volumn 5, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Kawabe, Takahiro ^a   Shirai, Nobu ^b   Wada, Yuji ^c   Miura, Kayo ^a   Kanazawa, So ^d   Yamaguchi, Masami K ^e,f  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL FOOD RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Japan)

^d JAPAN WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e CHUO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^f JAPAN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AGENCY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

TAU PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INFANT; PERCEPTION; VISUAL STIMULATION; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEARING; METHODOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; TIME; VISION;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; HEARING; HUMANS; INFANT; PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME FACTORS; VISION, OCULAR; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 77949861977     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0009503     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Dodd B (1979) Lip reading in infants: Attention to speech presented in and out of synchrony. Cogn Psychol 11: 478-484.
2. Spelke E, Born WS, Chu F (1983) Perception of moving, sounding objects by 4-month-old infants. Perception 12: 719-732.
3. Lewkowitcz DJ (1994) Development of intersensory perception in human infants. In Lewkowicz DJ, Lickliter R, eds. The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives. NJ, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp 165-204.
4. Lewkowicz D, Turkewitz G (1980) Crossmodal equivalence in early infancy: Auditory-visual intensity matching. Dev Psychol 16: 597-607.
5. Bahrick LE, Pickens JN (1994) Amodal relations: The basis for intermodal perception and learning in infancy. In Lewkowicz DJ, Lickliter R, eds. The development of intersensory perception: Comparative perspectives. NJ, Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum. pp 165-204.
6. Lewkowicz DJ (1994) Limitations on infants' response to rate-based auditory-visual relations. Dev Psychol 30: 880-892.
7. Lewkowicz DJ (2000) Development of intersensory temporal perception: An epigenetic systems/limitations view. Psychol Bull 126: 281-308.
8. Maurer D, Mondloch C (2004) Neonatal synesthesia: A re-evaluation. In: Munakata Y, Johnson MH, eds. Attention and performance XXI: Processes of change in brain and cognitive development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. pp 193-213.
9. Bahrick L, Lickliter R (2000) Intersensory redundancy guides attentional selectivity and perceptual learning in infancy. Dev Psychol 36: 190-201.
10. Driver J, Spence C (2000) Multisensory perception: Beyond modularity and convergence. Curr Biol 10: R731-R735.
11. Calvert GA (2001) Crossmodal processing in the human brain: Insights from functional neuroimaging studies. Cerebral cortex 11: 1110-1123.
12. Neil PA, Chee-Ruiter C, Scheier C, Lewkowicz DJ, Shimojo S (2006) Development of multisensory spatial integration and perception in humans. Dev Sci 9: 454-464.
13. Sekuler R, Sekuler AB, Lau R (1997) Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385: 308.
14. Watanabe K, Shimojo S (2001) When sound affects vision: Effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception. Psychol Sci 12: 109-116.
15. Kawabe T, Miura K (2006) Effects of perceptual grouping of moving objects in streaming/bouncing motion display. Percept & Psychophys 68: 750-758.
16. Scheier C, Lewkowicz DJ, Shimojo S (2003) Sound induces perceptual reorganization of an ambiguous motion display in human infants. Dev Sci 6: 233-241.
17. Wada Y, Shirai N, Otsuka Y, Midorikawa A, Kanazawa S, et al. (2009) Sound enhances detection of visual target during infancy: A study using illusory contours. J Exp Child Psychol 102: 315-322.
18. Vroomen J, de Gelder B (2000) Sound enhances visual perception: Cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 26: 1583-1590.
19. Kawabe T, Miura K, Yamada Y (2008) Audiovisual tau effect. Acta Psychol (Amst) 128: 249-254.
20. Benussi V (1913) Versuche zur Analyse taktil erweckter Scheinbewegungen (Contribution to the analysis of tactile processing of apparent motions). Archiv für die Gesamte Psychologie 36: 59-135.
21. Sarrazin J, Giraudo M, Pittenger JB (2007) Tau and Kappa effects in physical space: The case of audition. Psychol Res 71: 201-218.
22. Helson H (1930) The tau effect - an example of psychological relativity. Science 71: 536-537.
23. Helson H, King SM (1931) The tau effect: An example of psychological relativity. J Exp Psychol 14: 202-217.
24. Freeman E, Driver J (2008) Direction of visual apparent motion driven by timing of a static sound. Curr Biol 18: 1262-1266.
25. Roder BJ, Bushnell EW, Sasseville AM (2000) Infants' preferences for familiarity and novelty during the course of visual processing. Infancy 1: 491-507.
26. Quinn PC, Eimas PD (1996) Perceptual cues that permit categorical differentiation of animal species by Infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology 63: 189-211.
27. Fantz RL (1964) Visual experience in infants: Decreased attention to familiar patterns relative to novel ones. Science 146: 668-670.
28. Burr DC, Banks MS, Morrone MC (2009) Auditory dominance over vision in the perception of interval duration. Experimental Brain Research 198: 49-57.
29. Goldreich D (2007) A Bayesian perceptual model replicates the cutaneous rabbit and other tactile spatiotemporal illusions. PLoS ONE 2: e333. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000333.
30. Walsh V (2003) A theory of magnitude: Common cortical metrics of time, space and quantity. Trends Cogn Sci 7: 483-488.
31. Spector F, Maurer D (2009) Synesthesia: A new approach to understanding the development of perception. Dev Psychol 45: 175-189.
32. Shams L, Kamitani Y, Shimojo S (2000) Illusions. What you see is what you hear. Nature 408: 788.
33. Violentyev A, Shimojo S, Shams L (2005) Touch-induced visual illusion. Neuroreport 16: 1107-1110.
34. Andersen TS, Tiippana K, Sams M (2004) Factors influencing audiovisual fission and fusion illusion. Cogn Brain Res 21: 301-308.
35. Kawabe T (2009) Audiovisual temporal capture underlies flash fusion. Exp Brain Res 198: 195-208.
36. Mishra J, Martinez A, Sejnowski TJ, Hillyard SA (2007) Early cross-modal interactions in auditory and visual cortex underlie a sound-induced visual illusion. J Neurosci 27: 4120-4131.
37. Mishra J, Martinez A, Hillyard SA (2008) Cortical processes underlying sound-induced flash fusion. Brain Res 1242: 102-115.