Creativity and Cognitive Style: The Relationship Between Field-Dependence-Independence, Expected Evaluation, and Creative Performance

Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts

Volumn 1, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 243-246

  Miller, Angie L ^a  

^a BALL STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

cognitive style; creativity; expected evaluation; field dependence independence

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949850990     PISSN: 19313896     EISSN: 1931390X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1931-3896.1.4.243     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Amabile T.M. Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37 (1979) 221-233
2. Amabile T.M. Creativity in context (1996), Westview Press, Boulder, CO
3. Amabile T.M., Goldfarb P., and Brackfield S.C. Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal 3 (1990) 6-21
4. Bertini M., Pizzamiglio L., and Wapner S. Epilogue: Relation of Witkin's work to future trends in psychology. In: Bertini M., Puzzamiglio L., and Wapner S. (Eds). Field dependence in psychological theory, research, and application (1986), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 119-125
5. Cropley A.J. Fostering creativity in the classroom: General principles. In: Runco M.A. (Ed). The creativity research handbook 1 (1997), Hampton Press, Creeskill, NJ 83-114
6. Davis G. Creativity is forever. 5th ed. (2004), Kendall-Hunt Publishing Company, Dubuque, IA
7. Giaconia R.M., and Hedges L.V. Identifying features of effective open education. Review of Educational Research 52 (1982) 579-602
8. Goodstein L.D. The Group Embedded Figures Test. In: Buros O.K. (Ed). Mental measurement yearbook (1978), Gryphon, Highland Park, NJ 837-838
9. Guastello S.J., Shissler J., Driscoll J., and Hyde T. Are some cognitive styles more creatively productive than others?. Journal of Creative Behavior 32 (1998) 77-91
10. Hennessey B.A., and Amabile T.M. The conditions of creativity. In: Sternberg R.J. (Ed). The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (1988), Cambridge University Press, New York 11-38
11. Martinsen O., and Kaufmann G. Cognitive style and creativity. In: Runco M.A., and Pritzker S.R. (Eds). Encyclopedia of creativity 1 (1999), Academic Press, San Diego, CA 273-282
12. Morgan H. Cognitive styles and classroom learning (1997), Praeger, Westport, CT
13. Morris T.L., and Berum B.O. A note on the relationship between field-independence and creativity. Perceptual and Motor Skills 46 (1978) 1114
14. Oltman P.K., Raskin E., and Witkin H.A. Group Embedded Figures Test (1971), Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto, CA
15. Sternberg R.J., and Grigorenko E.L. Are cognitive styles still in style?. American Psychologist 52 (1997) 700-712
16. Thompson B., and Melancon J.G. Measurement characteristics of the Group Embedded Figures Test. Educational and Psychological Measurement 47 (1987) 765-772
17. Witkin H.A., and Goodenough D.R. Field dependence and interpersonal behavior. Psychological Bulletin 84 (1977) 661-689
18. Witkin H.A., and Goodenough D.R. Cognitive styles: Essence and origins (1981), International Universities Press, Inc, New York
19. Zhang L., and Sternberg R.J. A threefold model of intellectual styles. Educational Psychology Review 17 (2005) 1-53
20. Zhang L., and Sternberg R.J. The nature of intellectual styles (2006), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ