Insulin sensitivity (Si) assessment in lean and overweight subjects using two different protocols and updated software

Scandinavian Journal of Clinical and Laboratory Investigation

Volumn 70, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 98-103

  Borai, Anwar ^a   Livingstone, Callum ^a,b   Shafi, Shahida ^a   Zarif, Hawzen ^c   Ferns, Gordon ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b ROYAL SURREY COUNTY HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c KING KHALID NATIONAL GUARD HOSPITAL   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

COMAL; CV; FSIVGTT; Insulin sensitivity (Si); Minmod millennium; Reproducibility

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FEMALE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE; HUMAN; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; LEAN BODY WEIGHT; MALE; OBESITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY;

ADULT; BLOOD GLUCOSE; BODY MASS INDEX; FEMALE; GLUCOSE TOLERANCE TEST; HUMANS; INSULIN; INSULIN RESISTANCE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OVERWEIGHT; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 77949837336     PISSN: 00365513     EISSN: 15027686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/00365510903544585     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. DeFronzo RA, Ferrannini E. Insulin resistance. A multifaceted syndrome responsible for NIDDM, obesity, hypertension, dyslipidemia, and atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Diabetes Care 1991;14:173-194
2. DeFronzo RA, Bonadonna RC, Ferrannini E. Pathogenesis of NIDDM. A balanced overview. Diabetes Care 1992;15: 318-368
3. Bergman RN, Ider YZ, Bowden CR, Cobelli C. Quantitative estimation of insulin sensitivity. Am J Physiol 1979;236: E667-77.
4. DeFronzo RA, Tobin JD, Andres R. Glucose clamp technique: a method for quantifying insulin secretion and resistance. Am J Physiol 1979;237:E214-23.
5. Yang YJ, Youn JH, Bergman RN. Modifi ed protocols improve insulin sensitivity estimation using the minimal model. Am J Physiol 1987;253:E595-602.
6. Finegood DT, Hramiak IM, Dupre J. A modifi ed protocol for estimation of insulin sensitivity with the minimal model of glucose kinetics in patients with insulin-dependent diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 1990;70:1538-1549
7. Steil GM, Murray J, Bergman RN, Buchanan TA. Repeatability of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness from the minimal model. Implications for study design. Diabetes 1994;43:1365-1371
8. Borai A, Livingstone C, Ferns G. The biochemical assessment of insulin resistance. Ann Clin Biochem 2007;44: 324-342
9. Bergman RN, Prager R, Volund A, Olefsky JM. Equivalence of the insulin sensitivity index in man derived by the minimal model method and the euglycemic glucose clamp. J Clin Invest 1987;79:790-800.
10. Duysinx BC, Scheen AJ, Gerard PL, Letiexhe MR, Paquot N, Lefebvre PJ. Measurement of insulin sensitivity by the minimal model method using a simplifi ed intravenous glucose tolerance test: validity and reproducibility. Diabete Metab 1994;20: 425-432
11. Mehring GH, Coates PA, Brunel PC, Luzio SD, Owens DR. Insulin sensitivity in type 2 diabetes: univariate and multivariate techniques to derive estimates of insulin sensitivity from the insulin modifi ed intravenous glucose tolerance test (FSIGT). Comput Methods Programs Biomed 2002;68:161-176
12. Boston RC, Stefanovski D, Moate PJ, Sumner AE, Watanabe RM, Bergman RN. MINMOD Millennium: a computer program to calculate glucose effectiveness and insulin sensitivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Diabetes Technol Ther 2003;5:1003-1015
13. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310
14. Araujo-Vilar D, Rega-Liste CA, Garcia-Estevez DA, Sarmiento-Escalona F, Mosquera-Tallon V, Cabezas- Cerrato J. Minimal model of glucose metabolism: modifi ed equations and its application in the study of insulin sensitivity in obese subjects. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 1998;39: 129-141
15. Sumner AE, Luercio MF, Frempong BA, Ricks M, Sen S, Kushner H, Tollo-Reidch MK. Validity of the reducedsample insulin modifi ed frequently-sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test using the nonlinear regression approach. Metabolism 2009;58:220-225
16. Beard JC, Bergman RN, Ward WK, Porte D, Jr. The insulin sensitivity index in nondiabetic man. Correlation between clamp-derived and IVGTT-derived values. Diabetes 1986;35:362-369
17. Bergman RN, Phillips LS, Cobelli C. Physiologic evaluation of factors controlling glucose tolerance in man: measurement of insulin sensitivity and beta-cell glucose sensitivity from the response to intravenous glucose. J Clin Invest 1981;68:1456-1467
18. Coates PA, Ollerton RL, Luzio SD, Ismail IS, Owens DR. Reduced sampling protocols in estimation of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness using the minimal model in NIDDM. Diabetes 1993;42:1635-1641
19. Steil GM, Volund A, Kahn SE, Bergman RN. Reduced sample number for calculation of insulin sensitivity and glucose effectiveness from the minimal model. Suitability for use in population studies. Diabetes 1993;42:250-256
20. Abbate SL, Fujimoto WY, Brunzell JD, Kahn SE. Effect of heparin on insulin-glucose interactions measured by the minimal model technique: implications for reproducibility using this method. Metabolism 1993;42:353-357
21. Pacini G, Bergman RN. MINMOD: a computer program to calculate insulin sensitivity and pancreatic responsivity from the frequently sampled intravenous glucose tolerance test. Comput Methods Programs Biomed 1986;23:113-122