Family medicine research capacity building: Five-weekend programs in Ontario

Canadian Family Physician

Volumn 56, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Rosser, Walter ^a   Godwin, Marshall ^b   Seguin, Rachelle ^c  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^c NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANADA; CLINICAL EVALUATION; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COMMUNITY CARE; FAMILY MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CAPACITY BUILDING; FAMILY PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERINSTITUTIONAL RELATIONS; LEADERSHIP; ONTARIO; PERSONNEL SELECTION; PILOT PROJECTS; PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 77949819632     PISSN: 0008350X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Morris BA, Kerbel D, Luu-Trong N. Family practice residents' attitude towards their academic projects. Fam Med 1994;26(9):579-82.
2. Friedman RH, Wahi-Guruaj S, Alpert J, Bauchner H, Culpepper L, Heeren T, et al. The views of US medical school deans toward academic primary care. Acad Med 2004;79(11):1095-102.
3. Rosser WW. The decline of family medicine as a career choice. CMAJ 2002;166(11):1419-20.
4. DeHaven MJ, Wilson GR, Murphree DD. Developing a research program in a community-based department of family medicine: one department's experience. Fam Med 1994;26(5):303-8.
5. Goto A, Nguyen TN, Nguyen TM, Hughes J. Building postgraduate capacity in medical and public health research in Vietnam: an in-service training model. Public Health 2005;119(3):174-83.
6. Campbell JD, Longo DR. Building research capacity in family medicine: evaluation of the Grant Generating Project. J Fam Pract 2002;51(7):593.
7. Van der Zee J, Kroneman M, Bolìbar B. Conditions for research in general practice. Can the Dutch and British experiences be applied to other countries, for example Spain? Eur J Gen Pract 2003;9(2):41-7.
8. Farmer E, Weston K. A conceptual model for capacity building in Australian primary care research. Aust Fam Physician 2002;31(12):1139-42.
9. Jaén CR, Borkan J, Newton W. The next step in building family medicine research capacity: finding the way from fellowship. Ann Fam Med 2006;4(4):373-4.
10. Martin JC, Avant RF, Bowman MA, Bucholtz JR, Dickinson JR, Evans KL, et al. The future of family medicine: a collaborative project of the family medicine community leadership committee. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(Suppl 1):S3-S32.
11. World Organization of Family Doctors. WONCA bylaws. Singapore, Singapore: World Organization of Family Doctors; 2007. Available from: www.globalfamilydoctor.com/PDFs/2004%20Bylaws%20%20Regulations- RATIFIED%202007.pdf. Accessed 2010 Jan 21.
12. Talbot Y, Batty H, Rosser WW. Five Weekend National Family Medicine Fellowship Program for faculty development. Can Fam Physician 1997;43:2151-7.
13. De Maeseneer JM, De Sutter A. Why research in family medicine? A superfluous question. Ann Fam Med 2004;2(Suppl 2):S17-22.
14. Herbert CP. Future of research in family medicine: where to from here? Ann Fam Med 2004;2(Suppl 2):S60-4.