In the eye of the beholder: Does the master see the samespots as the novice?

Journal of Proteome Research

Volumn 9, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 1522-1532

  Silva, Ernesto ^a,b   O'Gorman, Martin ^c   Becker, Susanne ^b   Auer, Gert ^b   Eklund, Anders ^a   Grunewald, Johan ^a   Wheelock, Åsa M ^a,b  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^b KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^c Nonlinear Dynamics   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Background correction algorithm; Image analysis software; Progenesis Samespots; Quantitative intact proteomics; Technical variance; Two dimensional gel electrophoresis

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; EVALUATION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEOMICS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; TECHNOLOGY; TWO DIMENSIONAL ELECTROPHORESIS; TWO DIMENSIONAL GEL ELECTROPHORESIS;

ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ELECTROPHORESIS, GEL, TWO-DIMENSIONAL; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 77949806626     PISSN: 15353893     EISSN: 15353907     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/pr9010298     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Alban, A.; David, S. O.; Bjorkesten, L.; Andersson, C.; Sloge, E.; Lewis, S.; Currie, I. A novel experimental design for comparative two-dimensional gel analysis: two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis incorporating a pooled internal standard. Proteomics 2003, 3, 36-44.
2. Unlu, M.; Morgan, M. E.; Minden, J. S. Difference gel electrophoresis: a single gel method for detecting changes in protein extracts. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 2071-2077.
3. Wheelock, A. M.; Goto, S. Effects of post-electrophoretic analysis on variance in gel-based proteomics. Expert Rev. Proteomics 2006, 3, 129-142.
4. Dowsey, A. W.; Dunn, M. J.; Yang, G. Z. The role of bioinformatics in two-dimensional gel electrophoresis. Proteomics 2003, 3, 1567-1596.
5. Marengo, E.; Robotti, E.; Antonucci, F.; Cecconi, D.; Campostrini, N.; Righetti, P. G. Numerical approaches for quantitative analysis of two-dimensional maps: a review of commercial software and home-made systems. Proteomics 2005, 5, 654-666.
6. Van den Bergh, G.; Arckens, L. Fluorescent two-dimensional difference gel electrophoresis unveils the potential of gel-based proteomics. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2004, 15 (1), 38-43.
7. Gorg, A.; Weiss, W.; Dunn, M. J. Current two-dimensional electrophoresis technology for proteomics. Proteomics 2004, 4, 3665-3685.
8. Gorg, A.; Drews, O.; Luck, C.; Weiland, F.; Weiss, W. 2-DE with IPGs. Electrophoresis 2009, 30 (1), S122-S132.
9. Wheelock, A. M.; Buckpitt, A. R. Software-induced variance in twodimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis. Electrophoresis 2005, 26, 4508-4520.
10. Wheelock, A. M. ; Wheelock, C. E. Bioinformatics in gel-based proteomics. In Plant Proteomics: Technologies, Strategies and Applications; Rakwal, R., Agrawal, G., Eds.; John Wiley & Sons Inc.: Hoboken, NJ, 2008; pp 107-125.
11. Kreil, D. P.; Karp, N. A.; Lilley, K. S. DNA microarray normalization methods can remove bias from differential protein expression analysis of 2D difference gel electrophoresis results. Bioinformatics 2004, 20 (13), 2026-2034.
12. Eklund, A.; Blaschke, E. Relationship between changed alveolarcapillary permeability and angiotensin converting enzyme activity in serum in sarcoidosis. Thorax 1986, 41 (8), 629-634.
13. Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation aof microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. Biochem. 1976, 72, 248-254.
14. Kang, Y.; Techanukul, T.; Mantalaris, A.; Nagy, J. M. Comparison of three commercially available DIGE analysis software packages: minimal user intervention in gel-based proteomics. J. Proteome Res. 2009, 8 (2), 1077-1084.
15. Shapiro, S. S.; Wilk, M. B. An analysis of variance test for normality. Biometrika 1965, (52), 591.
16. Appel, R. D.; Vargas, J. R.; Palagi, P. M.; Walther, D.; Hochstrasser, D. F. Melanie II-a third-generation software package for analysis of two-dimensional electrophoresis images: IIAlgorithms. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 2735-2748.
17. Appel, R. D.; Palagi, P. M.; Walther, D.; Vargas, J. R.; Sanchez, J. C.; Ravier, F.; Pasquali, C.; Hochstrasser, D. F. Melanie II-a thirdgeneration software package for analysis of two-dimensional electrophoresis images: I. Features and user interface. Electrophoresis 1997, 18, 2724-2734.
18. Aittokallio, T.; Salmi, J.; Nyman, T. A.; Nevalainen, O. S. Geometrical distortions in two-dimensional gels: applicable correction methods. J. Chromatogr., B: Analyt. Technol. Biomed. Life Sci. 2005, 815, 25-37.
19. Karp, N. A.; Feret, R.; Rubtsov, D. V.; Lilley, K. S. Comparison of DIGE and post-stained gel electrophoresis with both traditional and SameSpots analysis for quantitative proteomics. Proteomics 2008, 8 (5), 948-960.
20. Pedreschi, R.; Hertog, M. L.; Carpentier, S. C.; Lammertyn, J.; Robben, J.; Noben, J. P.; Panis, B.; Swennen, R.; Nicolai, B. M. Treatment of missing values for multivariate statistical analysis of gel-based proteomics data. Proteomics 2008, 8 (7), 1371-1383.
21. Eisen, M. B.; Spellman, P. T.; Brown, P. O.; Botstein, D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 1998, 95 (25), 14863-14868.
22. Moritz, B.; Meyer, H. E. Approaches for the quantification of protein concentration ratios. Proteomics 2003, 3, 2208-2220.
23. Wheelock, A. M.; Buckpitt, A. R. Software-induced variance in twodimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis. Electrophoresis 2005, 26 (23), 4508-4520.
24. Valcu, C. M.; Valcu, M. Reproducibility of two-dimensional gel electrophoresis at different replication levels. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6 (12), 4677-4683.
25. Karp, N. A.; McCormick, P. S.; Russell, M. R.; Lilley, K. S. Experimental and statistical considerations to avoid false conclusions in proteomics studies using differential in-gel electrophoresis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6 (8), 1354-1364.
26. Uitto, P. M.; Lance, B. K.; Wood, G. R.; Sherman, J.; Baker, M. S.; Molloy, M. P. Comparing SILAC and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis image analysis for profiling urokinase plasminogen activator signaling in ovarian cancer cells. J. Proteome Res. 2007, 6 (6), 2105-2112.
27. Karp, N. A.; Lilley, K. S. Maximising sensitivity for detecting changes in protein expression: Experimental design using minimal CyDyes. Proteomics 2005, 5, 3105-3115.