Land-cover change detection using one-class support vector machine

Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing

Volumn 76, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 255-263

  Ll, Peijun ^a   Xu, Haiqing ^a  

^a PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REMOTE SENSING; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

CONVENTIONAL METHODS; KAPPA COEFFICIENT; MULTITEMPORAL CLASSIFICATION; ONE-CLASS CLASSIFIER; ONE-CLASS SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE; ONE-CLASS SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES (OCSVM); OVERALL ACCURACIES; POST-CLASSIFICATION COMPARISONS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; DATA SET; LAND COVER; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; REMOTE SENSING; SAMPLE PREPARATION;

EID: 77949806027     PISSN: 00991112     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.14358/pers.76.3.255     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Alashwal, H., S. Deris, and R.M. Othman, 2006. One-class support vector machines for protein-protein prediction, International Journal of Biomedical Sciences, 1(1):1306-1326.
2. Belousov, A.I., S.A. Verzakov, and J. von Frese, 2002. A flexible classification approach with optimal generalization performance: Support vector machines, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems, 64:15-25.
3. Bruzzone, L., and D.F. Prieto, 2000. Automatic analysis of the difference image for unsupervised change detection, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 38(3):1171-1182.
4. Chang, C., and C. Lin, 2001. LIBSVM: A library for Support Vector Machines, URL: http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/libsvm (last date accessed: 20 October 2009).
5. Congalton, R.G., 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 37:35-46.
6. Congalton, R.G., and K. Green, 1999. Assessing the Accuracy of Remotely Sensed Data: Principles and Practices, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, Florida, 137 p.
7. Congalton, R.G., and R.A. Mead, 1983. A quantitative method to test for consistency and correctness in photo interpretation, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 49(1):69-71.
8. Coppin, P.R., and M.E. Bauer, 1996. Digital change detection in forest ecosystems with remote sensing imagery. Remote Sensing Reviews, 13:207-234.
9. Foody, G.M., and A. Mathur, 2004. A relative evaluation of multiclass image classification by support vector machines, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(6):1335-1343.
10. Foody, G.M., 2002. Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment, Remote Sensing of Environment, 80:185-201.
11. Guo, Q, M. Kelly, and C. Graham, 2005. Support vector machines for prediction distribution of sudden oak death in California, Ecological Modeling, 128(1):75-90.
12. Guyon, L., J. Weston, S. Barnhill, and V. Vapnik, 2002. Gene selection for cancer classification using support vector machines. Machine Learning, 46(3):389-422.
13. Hastie, T., R.Tibsbirani, and J. Friedman, 2001. The Elements of Statistical Learning: Data Mining Inference and Prediction, Springer, New York, 532 p.
14. Huang, C., L.S. Davis, and J.R.G. Townshend, 2002. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23(4):725-749.
15. Janssen, L.F.J., and F.J.M. van der Wel, 1994. Accuracy assessment of satellite derived land-cover data: A review, Photogrammetric Engineering S- Remote Sensing, 60(4):419-426.
16. Jensen, J.R., 1996. Introductory Digital Image Processing: A Remote Sensing Perspective, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, 318 p.
17. Lu, D., P. Mausel, E. Brondizio, and E. Moran, 2004. Change detection techniques, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 25(12):2365-2407.
18. Macleod, R.D., and R.G. Congalton, 1998. A quantitative comparison of change detection algorithms for monitoring eelgrass from remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering B- Remote Sensing, 64(3):207-216.
19. Manevitz, L.M., and M. Yousef, 2001. One-class SVMs for document classification, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2:139-154.
20. Mas, J.F., 1999. Monitoring land-cover changes: A comparison of change detection techniques, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20(1):139-152.
21. Melgani, F., and L. Bruzzone, 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 42(8):1778-1790.
22. Moser, G., and S.B. Serpico, 2007. Unsupervised change-detection from multi-channel SAR data, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 4(2):278-282.
23. Muñoz-Mari, J., L. Bruzzone, and G. Camps-Valls, 2007. A support vector domain description approach to supervised classification of remote sensing images, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(8):2683-2792.
24. Pal, M., and P.M. Mather, 2005. Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 26(5):1007-1011.
25. Sanchez-Hernandez, C., D.S. Boyd, and G.M., Foody, 2007. One-class classification for mapping a specific land cover class: SVDD classification of Fenland, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 45(4):1061-1073.
26. Scholkopf, B., J.C. Piatt, J. Shawe-Taylor, A.J. Smola, and R.C. Williamson, 1999. Estimating the Support of a High Dimensional Distribution, Technique Report, MSR-TR-99-187, Microsoft Research.
27. Singh, A., 1989. Digital change detection techniques using remotelysensed data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 10(6):989-1003.
28. Smits, P.C., S.G. Dellepiane, and R.A. Schowengerdt, 1999. Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land cover mapping: A review and a proposal for a costbased approach, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20:1461-1486.
29. Sohl, T.L., A.L. Gallant, and T.R. Loveland, 2004. The characteristics and interpretability of land surface change and implications for project design, Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing, 70(4):439-448.
30. Song, C., G.E. Woodcock, K.C. Seto, M.P. Lenney, and S.A. Macomber, 2001. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sensing of Environment, 75:230-244.
31. Tax, D.M.J., 2001. One-class Classification, Ph.D. thesis, Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands, 190 p.
32. Tax, D.M.J., and R.P.W. Duin, 1999. Support vector domain description, Pattern Recognition Letters, 20:1191-1199.
33. th International Congress and Exhibition on Condition Monitoring and Diagnostic Engineering Management (COMADEM 2003), 27-29 August, Vexjo University, Sweden.
34. Vapnik, V.N., 2000. The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 314 p.
35. Woodcock, C.E., S.A. Macomber, M. Pax-Lenney, and W.B. Cohen, 2001. Monitoring large areas for forest change using Landsat: Generalization across space, time and Landsat sensors, Remote Sensing of Environment, 78:194-203.
36. Yuan, F., K.E. Sawaya, B.C. Loeffelholz, and M.E. Bauer, 2005. Land-cover classification and change analysis of the Twin Cities (Minnesota) Metropolitan Area by multitemporal Landsat remote sensing, Remote Sensing of Environment, 98:317-328.
37. Zhang, Q., J. Wang, X. Peng, P. Gong, and P. Shi, 2002. Urban built-up land change detection with road density and spectral information from multitemporal Landsat TM data, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23:3057-3078.