Maps on the Basis of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: The Journals Leonardo and Art Journal Versus "Digital Humanities" as a topic

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 61, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 787-801

  Leydesdorff, Loet ^a   Salah, Alkim Almila Akdag ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b ROYAL NETHERLANDS ACADEMY OF ARTS AND SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CITATION INDEX; COMMUNITY OF PRACTICE; CULTURAL IMPACTS; SCIENCE CITATION INDEX; SCIENCE JOURNALS; SOCIAL SCIENCE CITATION INDICES; WEB OF SCIENCE;

TECHNICAL WRITING;

EID: 77949778535     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.21303     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Agyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
2. Ahlgren, P., Jarneving, B., & Rousseau, R. (2003). Requirement for a cocitation similarity measure, with special reference to pearson's correlation coefficient. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(6), 550-560.
3. Aksnes, D.W., & Sivertsen, G. (2009). A macro-study of scientific productivity and publication patterns across all scientific and scholarly disciplines. In B. Larsen & J. Leta (Eds.), 12th International Conference of the International. Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics (Vol. 1, pp. 394-398). Rio de Janeiro: BIREME/PAHO/WHO and the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro.
4. Archambault, É., Vignola-Gagné, É., Côté, G., Larivière, V., & Gingras, Y. (2006). Benchmarking scientific output in the social sciences and humanities: The limits of existing databases. Scientometrics, 68(3), 329-342.
5. Arnheim, R. (1954). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
6. Arnheim, R. (1969). Visual thinking. Los Angeles: University of California Press.
7. Ball, R., & lunger, D. (2006). Science indicators revisited-Science Citation Index versus SCOPUS: A bibliometric comparison of both citation databases. Information Services and Use, 26(4), 293-301.
8. Bensman, S.J. (2007). Garfield and the impact factor. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (Vol. 41, pp. 93-155). Medford, NJ: Information Today.
9. Bollen, J., Van de Sompel, H., Hagberg, A., Bettencourt, L., Chute, R., Rodriguez, M.A., & Balakireva, L. (2009). Clickstream data yields high-resolution maps of science. PLoS ONE, 4(3), e4803.
10. Busa, R.A. (2004). Foreword: Perspectives on the digital, humanities. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
11. Butler, L. (2007). Assessing university research: A plea for a balanced approach. Science and Public Policy, 34(8), 565-574.
12. Cronin, B., Snyder, H., & Atkins, H. (1997). Comparative citation rankings of authors in monographic and journal literature: A study of sociology. Journal of Documentation, 53(3), 263-273.
13. Egghe, L., & Leydesdorff, L. (2009). The relation between Pearson's correlation coefficient r and Saltan's cosine measure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(5), 1027-1036.
14. Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool, in journal, evaluation. Science 178(4060), 471-479.
15. Garfield, E. (1979). Most cited authors in the arts and humanities, 1977-1978. Current Contents, 32, 5-10.
16. Garfield, E. (1982a). Data from Arts & Humanities Citation Index reveal the interrelationships of science and humanities. Current Contents 46, 5-7.
17. Garfield, E. (1982b). Arts and humanities journals differ from natural and social sciences journals-but their similarities are surprising. Current Contents 47, 5-11.
18. Gombrich, E.H. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial perception. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Goodman, N. (1988). Language of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
20. Griffith, B., Small, H., Stonehil, J., & Dey, S. (1974). Structure of scientific literatures II. Toward a macrostructure and microstructure for science. Science Studies, 4(4), 339-365.
21. Hicks, D., & Wang, J. (2009). Towards a bibliometric database for the social sciences and humanities, http://works.bepress.com/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article= 1017&context=di.ana-hicks/18
22. Hockney, S. (2004). The history of humanities computing. In S. Schreibman, R. Siemens, & J. Unsworth (Eds.), A companion to digital humanities (pp. 3-19). Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.
23. Howard, J. (2008). New ratings of humanities journals do more than rankthey rankle. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 55(7), A10.
24. Kamada, T., & Kawai, S. (1989). An algorithm for drawing general undirected graphs. Information Processing Letters, 31(1), 7-15.
25. Kessler, M.M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10-25.
26. Lewison, G. (2001). Evaluation of books as research outputs in history of medicine. Research. Evaluation, 10(2), 89-95.
27. Leydesdorff, L. (1994). The generation of aggregated journal-journal citation maps on the basis of the CD-ROM version of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 31(1), 59-84.
28. Leydesdorff, L. (2007). Visualization of the citation impact environments of scientific journals: An online mapping exercise. Journal of the American Society of Information Science and Technology, 58(1), 207-222.
29. Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluation. Journal, of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 278-287.
30. Leydesdorff, L., & Cozzens, S.E. (1993). The delineation of specialties in terms of journals using the dynamic journal set of the Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 26(1), 133-1.54.
31. Leydesdorff, L., De Moya-Anegón, F., & Guerrero-Bote, V.P. (2010). Journal maps on the basis of Scopus data: A comparison with the Journal Citation Reports of the ISI. Journal, of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(2), 352-369.
32. Leydesdorff, L., Schank, T., Schamhorst, A., & De Nooy, W. (2008). Animating the development of social networks over time using a dynamic extension of multidimensional, scaling. El Profesional de Información, 17(6), 611-626.
33. Linmans, J. (in press). Why with bibliometrics the humanities does not need to be the weakest link. Scientometrics.
34. Marshakova, I.V. (1973). Bibliographic coupling system based on references. Nauchno-Tekhnicheskaya Informatsiya Seriya, Ser. 2(SSR 2), 3-8.
35. McCarty, W. (1998). What is humanities computing? Toward a definition of the field. Paper presented at Liverpool, 20 February 1998. Retrieved January 14, 2010, from http://staff.cch.kcl.ac.uk/≈wmc carty/essays/McCarty,%20What%20. is%20humanities%20computing.pdf
36. McCarty, W. (2003). Humanities computing. Encyclopedia of Library and Information Science, 1224-1236.
37. Nederhof, A.J. (2006). Bibliometric monitoring of research performance in the social sciences and the humanities: A review. Scientometrics, 66(1), 81-100.
38. Nederhof, A.J., & Van Raan, A.F.J. (1987). Peer review and bibliometric indicators of scientific performance: A comparison of cum laude doctorates with ordinary doctorates in physics. Scientometrics, 11(5), 333-350.
39. Neu, J. (1985). One hundred tenth critical, bibliography of the history of science and its cultural influences. Isis, 76(5), 5-240.
40. Piez, W. (2008). Something called 'digital humanities.' Digital Humanities Quarterly 2(1), 1-11. Retrieved January 14, 2010, from http://digitalhumanities.org/dhq/vol/2/1/000020.html
41. Raben, J. (1991). Humanities computing 25 years later. Computers and the Humanities, 25(6), 341-350.
42. Salah, A.A.A., & Salah, A.A. (2008). Technoscience art: A bridge between neuroesthetics and art history? Review of General Psychology, .12(2), 47-58.
43. Small, H. (1973). Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265-269.
44. Small, H. (1978). Cited documents as concept symbols. Social Studies of Science, 7, 113-122.
45. Unsworth, J. (2002). What is humanities computing and what is not? Jahrbuch für Computerphilologie, 4, 71-84.
46. Van Leeuwen, TN., Moed, H.F., Tijssen, R.J.W., Visser, M.S., & Van Raan, A.F.J. (2001). Language biases in the coverage of the Science Citation Index, and its consequences for international comparisons of national, research performance. Scientometrics, 51(1), 335-346.