Hyperelastic materials modelling using a strain measure consistent with the strain energy postulates

Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part C: Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science

Volumn 224, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 591-602

  Darijani, H ^a   Naghdabadi, R ^a   Kargarnovin, M H ^a  

^a SHARIF UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Hyperelastic materials; Incompressible and compressible materials; Material parameters; Strain energy density

Indexed keywords

CHARACTERISTIC FUNCTIONS; COMPRESSIBLE MATERIAL; DEFORMATION MEASURES; HOMOGENEOUS DEFORMATION; HYPERELASTIC MATERIALS; ISOTROPIC MATERIALS; KIRCHHOFF; LAGRANGIAN; MATERIAL PARAMETER; MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSIONS; SAINT-VENANT; STRAIN ENERGY DENSITY; STRAIN ENERGY DENSITY FUNCTIONS; STRAIN MEASURES; TEST DATA;

DEFORMATION; ELASTICITY; INCOMPRESSIBLE FLOW; RATIONAL FUNCTIONS; STRAIN ENERGY; TEST FACILITIES; WELDS;

MATERIALS;

EID: 77949736601     PISSN: 09544062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1243/09544062JMES1590     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Rivlin, R. S. and Saunders, D. W. Large elastic deformations of isotropic materials VII, experiments on the deformation of rubber. Phils. Trans. R. Soc., 1951, A-243, 251-288.
2. Valanis, K. C. and Landel, R. F. The strain-energy function of hyper-elastic material in termsof extension ratios. J. Appl. Phys., 1967, 38, 2997-3002.
3. Ogden, R. W. Biaxial deformation of rubber-like solids: comparison of theory and experiment. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 1979, 12, 1463-1472.
4. Kakavas, P. A. A new development of the strain energy function for hyperelastic materials using a logarithmic strain approach. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2000, 77, 660-672.
5. Attard, M. M. Finite strain isotropic hyperelasticity. Int. J. Solids Struct. 2003, 40, 4353-4378.
6. Beatty,M. F. Topics in finite elasticity: hyperelasticity of rubber, elastomers and biological tissues with examples. Appl.Mech. Rev., 1987, 40, 1699-1734.
7. Yamashita, Y. and Kawabata, S. Approximated form of the strain energy-density function of carbon black filled rubbers for industrial applications. Int. Polym. Sci. Technol., 1993, 20, 52-64.
8. Yeoh, O. H. Characterization of elastic properties of carbon black filled rubber vulcanizates. Rub Chem Technol., 1990, 63, 792-805.
9. Yeoh,O. H. Some forms of the strain energy function for rubber. Rub. Chem. Technol., 1993, 66, 754-771.
10. Lambert-Diani, J. and Rey, C. New phenomenological behavior laws for rubbers and thermoplastic elastomers. Eur. J.Mech. Solids, 1999, 18, 1027-1043.
11. El-Lawindy, A. M. Y. and El-Guiziri, S. B. Strain energy density of carbon-black-loaded rubber vulcanizates. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys., 2000, 33, 1894-1901.
12. Boyce, M. C. and Arruda, E. M. Constitutive models of rubber elasticity. Rubb. Chem. Technol., 2000, 73, 504-523.
13. Bradley, G. L., Chang, P. C., and Mckenna, G. B. Rubber modeling using uniaxial test data. J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 2001, 81, 837-848.
14. Bischoff, J. E., Arruda, E. M., and Grosh, K. A new constitutive model for the compressibility of elastomers at finite deformations. Rub. Chem. Technol., 2000, 74, 541-559.
15. Liu, I-Shih. Continuum mechanics, 2002 (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, NewYork).
16. Hill, R. Aspects of invariance in solid mechanics. Adv. Appl.Mech., 1978, 18, 1-75.
17. Seth, B. R. Generalized strain measures with application to physical problems. In Second-order effects in elasticity, plasticity and fluid dynamics, 1964, pp. 162-172 (Pergamon, Oxford).
18. Ogden, R. W. Non-linear elastic deformations, 1997 (Dover Publications, Inc,Mineola, NewYork).
19. Treloar, L. R. G. The physics of rubber elasticity, 1975 (Clarendon Press, Oxford).
20. Bock, N. and Holzapfel, G. A. A new two-point deformation tensor and its relation to the classical kinematical framework and the stress concept. Int. J. Solids Struct., 2004, 41, 7459-7469.
21. Drozdov, A. D. Constitutive equations in finite elasticity of rubbers. Int. J. Solids Struct., 2007, 44, 272-297.
22. Hartmann, S. Parameter estimation of hyperelasticity relations of generalized polynomial-type with constraint conditions. Int. J. Solids Struct., 2001, 38, 7999-8018.
23. Gendy, A. S. and Saleeb, A. F. Nonlinear material parameter estimation of characterizing hyperelastic large strain models. Comput.Mech., 2000, 25, 66-77.
24. Treloar, L. R. G. Stress-strain data for vulcanised rubber under various types of deformation. Trans Faraday Soc., 1944, 40, 59-70.
25. Kawabata,S.,Matsuda, M.,Tel, K.,and Kawai,H. Experimental survey of the strain energy density function of isoprene rubber vulcanizate. Macromolecules, 1981, 14, 154-162.
26. Heuillet, P. and Dugautier, L. Modelisation du comportement hyperelastique des caoutchoucs et elastomeres thermoplastiques, compacts on cellulaires. Genie Mecanique des Caoutchoucs et des Elastomeres Thermoplastiques, 1997.
27. Alexander, H. A constitutive relation for rubber-like materials. Int. J. Engng Sci., 1968, 9, 549-563.
28. Bridgman,P.W.The pressure-volume-temperature relations of fifteen liquids. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci., 1933, 68.
29. Bridgman, P. W. Electrical resistances and volume changes up to 20 000 kg/cm2. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci., 1935, 21, 109.
30. Adams, L. H. and Gibson, R. E. The compressibility of rubber. J. Acad. Sci., 1930, 20, 213-223.
31. Bridgman, P. W. The compression of 61 substances to 25 000 kg/cm2 determined by a new rapid method. Proc. Am. Acad. Arts Sci., 1945, 76, 9-24.
32. El-Ratal,W. H. andMallick,P. K. Elastic response of flexible polyurethane foams in uniaxial tension. Trans.ASME, J. EngngMater. Technol., 1996, 118, 157-161.