Reasons for and against the use of the team concept in joint settings

Team Performance Management: An International Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 1999, Pages 4-15

  Huszczo, Gregory E ^a   Hoffman, Danny ^b  

^a EASTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Industrial relations; Organizational development; Participation; Teams; Trade unions

Indexed keywords

EID: 77949707943     PISSN: 13527592     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/13527599910263107     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Babson, S. (1995), “When empowerment means exploitation: negotiating the terms of lean production”, Working USA, M.E. Sharp, Armonk, NY
2. Banks, A. and Metzgar, J. (1989), “Participating in management: union organizing on new terrain”, Labor Research Review, No. 14, Vol. VIII No. 2
3. Bluestone, B. and Bluestone, I. (1992), Negotiating the Future: A Labor Perspective on American Business, Basic Books, New York, NY
4. Cole, R. (1984), “Some principles concerning union involvement in quality circles and other employee involvement programs”, Labor Studies Journal, Vol. 8 No. 4
5. Huszczo, G. (1996), Tools for Team Excellence, Davies-Black Publishing, Palo Alto, CA
6. Huszczo, G. and Sheahan, M. (1997), Neutral Is Not Enough: Advocating for Both Sides, American Society for Training and Development International Conference, Washington, DC
7. Lawler, E., Ledford, G. and Mohrman, S. (1989), Employee Involvement in America: A Study of Contemporary Practice, American Productivity Center, Houston, TX
8. Marshall, R. (1987), Unheard Voices: Labor and Economic Policy in a Competitive World, Basic Books, New York, NY
9. Taylor, F.W. (1911), Scientific Management, Harper, New York, NY
10. Wellins, R., Byham, W. and Wilson, J. (1991), Empowered Teams, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA