Risk analysis and risk acceptance criteria in the planning processes of hazardous facilities-A case of an LNG plant in an urban area

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 95, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 662-670

  Vinnem, Jan Erik ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STAVANGER   (Norway)

Author keywords

QRA; Risk acceptance; Risk communication; Risk informed legislation

Indexed keywords

INFORMED DECISION; INTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVE; LEGISLATIVE SYSTEMS; LNG PLANT; NEIGHBOURHOOD; ONSHORE FACILITIES; OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS; PLANNING PROCESS; RISK ACCEPTANCE; RISK ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA; RISK COMMUNICATION; RISK EVALUATION; URBAN AREAS;

LAWS AND LEGISLATION; LIQUEFIED NATURAL GAS; REGIONAL PLANNING; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY FACTOR;

RISK ANALYSIS;

EID: 77949659459     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2010.02.005     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Act relating to the Prevention of Fire, Explosion and Accidents involving Hazardous Substances and the Fire Services, stipulated 14 June, 2002.
2. Council Directive 96/82/EC of 9 December 1996 on the control of major-accident hazards involving dangerous substances.
3. Regulations of 17th June 2005 relating to measures to prevent major accidents in enterprises handling hazardous substances, Directorate for civil protection and emergency planning.
4. Investigation of failure of societal barriers in the localisation of LNG facility in Risavika in Sola community (in Norwegian), Preventor report 200800-01, 3.10.2008.
5. Lindøe P., and Braut G.S. Risk regulation in the Norwegian petroleum industry: robustness and changing methods of operation. In: Bris, Guedes S., and Martorell (Eds). Reliability, Risk and Safety, Theory and Applications (2009), CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group, London
6. Karlsen J.E., and Lindøe P.H. The NordicOHSModel at aTurning Point?. Policy and Practice in Health and Safety 4 1 (2006) 17-30
7. Hopkins A., and Hale A. Issues in the regulation. In: Kirwan B., Hale A., and Hopkins A. (Eds). Changing Regulatin Controlling Risks in Society (2002), Pergamon, Amsterdam 8-12
8. Standard Norway: risk and emergency preparedness analysis, Z-013, Rev. 2, 2001.
9. Standard Norway: requirements for risk assessment (in Norwegian), NS 5814:2008.
10. Evaluation of safety aspects with alternative concepts and localisation of new LNG plant (in Norwegian), Scandpower Risk Management AS, rapport nr.: 33.690.015/R1, 01.03.2005.
11. Risk analysis of LNG plan in early concept phase (in Norwegian), Scandpower Risk Management AS, rapport nr.: 33.690.015/R2, 29.04.2005.
12. Risk and vulnerability analysis of Ro-Ro terminal and container terminal in Risavika harbour (in Norwegian), Scandpower Risk Management AS, rapport nr.: 33.550.002/R1, 23.01.2006.
13. Risk and vulnerability analysis of bulk terminal with LNG plant in Risavika harbour (in Norwegian), Scandpower Risk Management AS, rapport nr.: 90.550.001/R2, 8.06.2006.
14. Capra G, Cleaver P, Chester A & Phillips A. QRA of the proposed Lyse Gass LNG base load export terminal, Advantica, R100-PB-S-SR0001, 11.04.2007.
15. Quantitative risk analysis (QRA) Lyse LNG base load plant Train 1, Linde, R100-LE-S-RS0003, 25.08.2007.
16. PSA. Regulations relating to management in the petroleum activities (The management regulations).
17. HSE: Guidance on 'as low as reasonably practicable' (ALARP) decisions in control of major accident hazards (COMAH), 10.6.2008, 〈http://www.hse.gov.uk/comah/circular/perm12.htm〉.
18. PSA. About unacceptable use of risk calculations in order to deviate from requirements in the HES legislation, letter 26.11.2007 to oil companies and contractors.
19. Danielsen HK, Risavika LNG-Third party review of QRA, DNV Memo No HKDA/228703, dated 22.10.2007.
20. Schiefloe PM, et al. Cause analysis for the Snorre A incident 28.11.2004 (in Norwegian), StatoilHydro report dated 31.10.2005.
21. Jacobsen SR, Dalsgaard LJ & Etterlid H. Investigation of incident, hydrocarbon leak in utility shaft on Stafjord A 24.05.2008 (in Norwegian), Petroleum Safety Authority, 25.09.2008.
22. Vatn J, Vatn GÅ & Drottz-Sjøber B-M. Societal security-a case study related to an LNG facility, Social Security Conference, 2008, Norwegian Research Foundation.
23. Uijt de Haag P, Gooijer L and Frijns PJMG. Quantitative risk calculation for land use decisions: the validity and the need for unification. In: Kao, Zio, Ho, editors. Proceedings of PSAM9, International conference on Probabilistic Safety Assessment & Management, 18-23 May 2008, Hong Kong, China, 2008.
24. NATO/PFP UNCLASSIFIED-III-1-1, Risk acceptance criteria, AASTP1-III, December 2003.
25. Aven T., and Vinnem J.E. Risk management with application from the offshore petroleum industry (2007), Springer
26. Aven T., and Kristensen V. Perspectives on risk: review and discussion of the basis for establishing a unified holistic approach. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 90 (2005) 1-14
27. Renn O., and Klinke A. A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based precaution-based and discourse-based strategies. Risk Anal 22 6 (2002) 1071-1094
28. Vinnem J.E. Evaluation of methodology for QRA in offshore operations. Reliability Engineering & System Safety 61 1-2 (1998) 39-52
29. Aven T., and Vinnem J.E. On the use of risk acceptance criteria in the offshore oil and gas industry. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 90 (2005) 15-24
30. Ale B.J.M. Living with risk: a management question. Reliability Engineering and System Safety 90 (2005) 196-205
31. HSE. Risk criteria for land-use planning in the vicinity of major industrial hazards (1989), HMSO. 0 11 885491 7
32. Le Guen J. Reducing risks, protecting people (1999), HSE
33. Omgaan met Risico's, Tweede Kamer, vergaderjaar 1988-1989, 21137, nr 5. Under the same number the translation in English is titled: Premises for risk management.