AHRQ Series Commentary 1: Rating the evidence in comparative effectiveness reviews

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 63, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 474-475

  Falck Ytter, Yngve ^a   Schünemann, Holger ^b   Guyatt, Gordon ^b  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS REVIEW; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DISEASE MARKER; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE CENTER; GENCY FOR HEALTHCARE RESEARCH AND QUALITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH PROGRAM; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE;

EID: 77949658496     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.01.003     Document Type: Note

References (3)

1. Guyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Vist G., Kunz R., Falck-Ytter Y., Alonso-Coello P., et al., for the GRADE Working Group. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 336 (2008) 924-926
2. Guyatt G.H., Oxman A.D., Kunz R., Vist G.E., Falck-Ytter Y., Schünemann H.J., and GRADE Working Group. Rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations: what is "quality of evidence" and why is it important to clinicians?. BMJ 336 (2008) 995-998
3. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J 121 9 (1979) 1193-1254