From waste to hydrogen: An optimal design of energy production and distribution network

Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 534-545

  Parker, Nathan ^a   Fan, Yueyue ^a   Ogden, Joan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Facility location; Freight transport; Hydrogen infrastructure; Logistics network design; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURE; FREIGHT TRANSPORTATION; HYDROGEN PRODUCTION; INTEGER PROGRAMMING; LOGISTICS; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; RENEWABLE ENERGY RESOURCES;

ENERGY PATHWAY; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; FACILITIES LOCATIONS; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; HYDROGEN INFRASTRUCTURE; LOGISTIC NETWORK DESIGN; LOGISTICS NETWORK; NETWORK DESIGN; OPTIMAL DESIGN; RENEWABLE ENERGIES;

AGRICULTURAL WASTES;

FACILITY LOCATION; FREIGHT TRANSPORT; HYDROGEN; INFRASTRUCTURE; LOGISTICS; NETWORK DESIGN; RENEWABLE RESOURCE;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77949656876     PISSN: 13665545     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tre.2009.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Chardaire P., Sutter A., Costa M.C. Solving the dynamic facility location problem. Networks 1996, 28:117-124.
2. Cordeau J.F., Pasin F., Solomon M.M. An integrated model for logistics network design. Annals of Operations Research 2006, 144:59-82.
3. Daskin M.S., Coullard C., Shen Z.J.M. An inventory-location model: formulation, solution algorithm and computational results. Annals of Operations Research 2002, 110:83-106.
4. Dias J., Captivo M.E., Clμimaco J. Efficient primal-dual heuristic for a dynamic location problem. Computers & Operations Research 2007, 34:1800-1823.
5. DOE, 2006. H2A delivery components model version 1.1: Users guide. (accessed 05.01.07). http://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/h2a_delivery_doc.pdf.
6. Dolan, E., 2001. The NEOS Server 4.0 Administrative Guide, Technical Memorandum ANL/MCS-TM-250, Mathematics and Computer Science Division, Argonne National Laboratory.
7. Geoffrion A.M., Powers R.F. Twenty years of strategic distribution system design: an evolutionary perspective. Interfaces 1995, 25:105-127.
8. Hamelinck C.N., Faaij A.P.C. Future prospects for production of methanol and hydrogen from biomass. Journal of Power Sources 2002, 111:1-22.
9. IEA, 2006. World Energy Outlook 2006. Technical Report, International Energy Agency. http://www.iea.org/textbase/nppdf/free/2006/weo2006.pdf.
10. Jenkins, B.M., Bakker-Dhaliwal, R., Summers, M.D., Berheim, L.G., Lee, H., Huisman, W., Yan, L., 2000. Equipment performances, costs, and constraints in the commercial harvesting of rice straw for industrial applications, 2000 ASAE Annual International Meeting, Milwaukee, WI.
11. Katofsky R.E. The Production of Fluid Fuels, from Biomass in Partial Completion of Master of Science in Mechanical Engineering 1993, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ.
12. Larson, E., Jin, H., Celik, F.E., 2005. Gasification-Based Fuels and Electricity Production from Biomass, Without and with Carbon Capture and Storage, Research Report, Princeton Environmental Institute, Princeton University.
13. Lau, F.S., 2003. Techno-Economic Analysis of Hydrogen Production by Gasification of Biomass. Department of Energy and National Renewable Energy Laboratory, DE-FC36-01GO11089.
14. Lieckens K., Vandaele N. Reverse logistics network design with stochastic lead times. Computers & Operations Research 2007, 34:395-416.
15. Lin Z., Chen C.W., Ogden J., Fan Y. The least-cost hydrogen for southern California. Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2008, 33:3009-3014.
16. Melo, T., Nickel, S., Saldanha da Gama, F., 2007. Facility Location and Supply Chain Management - A Comprehensive Review. Technical Report, Fraunhofer ITWM. (). http://www.itwm.fraunhofer.de/zentral/download/berichte/bericht130.pdf.
17. Mulvey J.M., Vladimirou H. Applying progressive hedging algorithm to stochastic general networks. Annals of Operations Research 1991, 31:399-424.
18. NAS, 2004. The Hydrogen Economy - Opportunities, Costs, Barriers, and R&D Needs. National Research Council and National Academy of Engineering, Washington, DC.
19. ORNL, 2005. Biomass as Feedstock for a Bioenergy and Bioproducts Industry: The Technical Feasibility of a Billion-Ton Annual Supply, US Department of Agriculture, US Department of Energy, and Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
20. Parker, N., 2004. Using natural gas transmission pipeline costs to estimate hydrogen pipeline costs, Research Report, Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis.
21. Parker, N., 2006. Optimal design of hydrogen production from agricultural waste. In: National Hydrogen Association (NHA) Annual Hydrogen Conference. Long Beach, CA.
22. Parker N. Optimizing the Design of Biomass Hydrogen Supply Chains using Real-World Spatial Distributions: A Case Study using California Rice Straw in Partial Completion of Master's of Science in Transportation Technology and Policy 2007, University of California, Davis, CA.
23. Pacala, S., Socolow, R., 2004. Stabilization wedges: solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies, science, 305: 968-972. http://www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/abstract/305/5686/968.
24. ReVelle C.S., Laporte G. The plant location problem: new models and research prospects. Operations Research 1996, 44:864-874.
25. Rockafellar R.T., Wets R.J.-B. Scenarios and policy aggregation in optimization under uncertainty. Mathematics of Operations Research Archive 1991, 16(1):119-147.
26. Sahinidis, N.V., Tawarmalani, M., 2005. BARON 7.2.5: Global Optimization of Mixed-Integer Nonlinear Programs, User's Manual.
27. Simbeck, D., Chang, E., 2002. Hydrogen Supply: Cost Estimate for Hydrogen Pathways - Scoping Analysis. Department of Energy and National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/SR-540-32525.
28. Snyder L.V. Facility location under uncertainty: a review. IIE Transactions 2006, 38(7):547-564.
29. Spath, P., Aden, A., Eggeman, T., Ringer, M., Wallace, B., Jechura, J., 2005. Biomass to Hydrogen Production Detailed Design and Economics Utilizing the Battelle Columbus Laboratory Indirectly-Heated Gasifier. Department of Energy and National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-510-37408.
30. Spath, P., Mann, M.K., and Amos, W.A., 2003. Update of Hydrogen from Biomass - Determination of the Delivered Cost of Hydrogen, Department of Energy and National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/MP-510-33112.
31. Van Roy T.J., Erlenkotter D. A dual-based procedure for dynamic facility location. Management Science 1982, 28:1091-1105.
32. Yang C., Ogden J. Determining the lowest-cost hydrogen delivery mode. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 2007, 32(2):268-286.